Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 285–297

Using Palm Technology in Participatory Simulations of Complex Systems: A New Take on Ubiquitous and Accessible Mobile Computing

Article

Abstract

This paper reports on teachers’ perceptions of the educational affordances of a handheld application called Participatory Simulations. It presents evidence from five cases representing each of the populations who work with these computational tools. Evidence across multiple data sources yield similar results to previous research evaluations of handheld activities with respect to enhancing motivation, engagement and self-directed learning. Three additional themes are discussed that provide insight into understanding curricular applicability of Participatory Simulations that suggest a new take on ubiquitous and accessible mobile computing. These themes generally point to the multiple layers of social and cognitive flexibility intrinsic to their design: ease of adaptation to subject-matter content knowledge and curricular integration; facility in attending to teacher-individualized goals; and encouraging the adoption of learner-centered strategies.

Keywords

simulations handhelds complex systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrahamson, L. A., Hantline, F., Faber, M., Robson, M., and Knapp, R. (1989). Electronic classroom system enabling interactive self-paced learning [patent #5002491], Patent and Trademark Office, Washington DC, United States of America.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, G., Woodruff, E., MacKinnon, K. A., and Yoon, S. (2003). A preliminary report on introducing “Thinking Tags” to kindergarten students through a dental health simulation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19: 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bannasch, S., and Tinker, R. (2002). Probeware takes a seat in the classroom. The Concord Consortium, Concord.org 6(1), [Web Resource] Available Online. http://www.concord. org/newsletter/2002winter/probwre.html.
  4. Borovoy, R., McDonald, M., Martin, F., and Resnick, M. (1996). Things that blink: Computationally augmented name tags. IBM Systems Journal 35: 488–495.Google Scholar
  5. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  6. Clyde, L. (2004). Computing in the palm of your hand. Teacher Librarian 31: 42–44.Google Scholar
  7. Colella, V. (2000). Participatory simulations: Building collaborative understanding through immersive dynamic modeling. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 9: 471–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colella, V., Klopfer, E., and Resnick, M. (2001). Adventures in Modeling: Exploring Complex, Dynamic Systems with Star Logo, Teacher College Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Curtis, M., Luchini, K., Bobrowsky, W., Quintana, C., and Soloway, E. (2002). Handheld use in K-12: A descriptive account. In Proceedings of The First IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE’02), IEEE Press, New York, pp. 22–30.Google Scholar
  10. Goldman, S., Pea, R., Maldonado, H., Martin, L., and White, T. (2004). Functioning in the Wireless Classroom. In Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE’04). IEEE Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Inkpen, K. M. (1999). Designing handheld technologies for kids. Personal Technologies Journal 3: 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jipping, M., Dieter, S., Krikke, J., and Sandro, S. (2001). Using handlheld computers in the classroom: Laboratories and collaboration on handheld machines. (Proceedings of the 2001 SIGCSE Technical Symposium). SIGCSE Technical Bulletin 33: 169–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Klopfer, E., and Woodruff, E. (2002). The Impact of Distributed and Ubiquitous Computational Devices on The Collaborative Learning Environment. In Proceedings of the Annual CSCL Conference, Boulder, CO, 702.Google Scholar
  14. Klopfer, E., Yoon, S., and Rivas, L. (2004). Comparative analysis of Palm and wearable computers for Participatory Simulations. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20: 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lincoln, Y. S., and Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In Densin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  16. May, M. (2003). Hand-on power. The Scientist 17: 1–4.Google Scholar
  17. Metcalf, S., and Tinker, R. (2004). Probeware and handhelds in elementary and middle school science. Journal of Science Education and Technology 13: 43–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ogata, H., Yano, Y., Furugori, N., and Jin, Q. (2001). Computer supported social networking for augmenting cooperation, computer supported cooperative work. The Journal of Collaborative Computing 10: 189–209.Google Scholar
  19. Ogata, H., and Yano, Y. (2003). How ubiquitous computing can support language learning, In Proceedings of KEST 2003, Honjo, Akita, Japan, 1–6.Google Scholar
  20. Relan, A., Guiton, G., Parker, N., and Wilkerson, L. (2003, April). A Hand-Held Requirement for Clinical Education: Effectiveness of a Systemic Educational Intervention in Altering Perception and Use of Handhelds Among Medical Students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  21. Resnick, M. (1994). Turtles, Termites and Traffic Jams: Explorations in Massively Parallel Microworlds, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  22. Roschelle, J., and Pea, R. (2002). To Unlock the Learning Value of Wireless Mobile Devices, Understand Coupling. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE’02).Google Scholar
  23. Roschelle, J. (2003). Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19: 260–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Soloway, E., Norris, C., Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B., Krajcik, J., and Marx, R. (2001). Handheld devices are ready-at-hand. Communications of the ACM 44: 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Strauss, A. L., and Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.), Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  26. Tinker, R., and Krajcik, J. (2001). Portable Technologies: Science Learning in Context, Kluwer Academic, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Vahey, P., and Crawford, V. (2002). Palm Education Pioneers Program: Final Evaluation Report, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA.Google Scholar
  28. Wilensky, U., and Stroup, W. (2000). Networked Gridlock: Students Enacting Complex Dynamic Phenomena with the HubNet Architecture. In Proceedings of The Fourth Annual International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  29. Woodruff, E., Klopfer, E., Yoon, S., and Young, L. (2003). Platforms for Participatory Simulations: Generating Discourse with Wearable and Handheld Computers. In Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning annual conference, Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
  30. Yoon, S., and Woodruff, E. (2003, April). Rethinking Teaching and Learning About Scientific and Technological Issues: Exploring the Development of Memes in a Complex System. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  31. Zurita, G., and Nussbaum, M. (2004). Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers. Computers and Education 42: 289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Teacher Education ProgramMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridge

Personalised recommendations