Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 435–446 | Cite as

Science Anxiety and Gender in Students Taking General Education Science Courses

Article

Abstract

Earlier studies [Mallow, J. V. (1994). Gender-related science anxiety: A first binational study. Journal of Science Education and Technology 3: 227–238; Udo, M. K., Ramsey, G. P., Reynolds-Alpert, S., and Mallow, J. V. (2001). Does physics teaching affect gender-based science anxiety? Journal of Science Education and Technology 10: 237–247] of science anxiety in various student cohorts suggested that nonscience majors were highly science anxious (SA), regardless of what science courses they were taking. In this study, we investigated science anxiety in a cohort consisting mostly of nonscience majors taking general education science courses. Regression analysis shows that the leading predictors of science anxiety are (i) nonscience anxiety and (ii) gender, as they were for different cohorts in the earlier studies. We confirm earlier findings that females are more SA than males. Chi-square analysis of acute science anxiety shows an amplification of these differences. We found statistically significant levels of science anxiety in humanities and social science students of both genders, and gender differences in science anxiety, despite the fact that the students were all enrolled in general education science courses specifically designed for nonscience majors. We found acute levels of anxiety in several groups, especially education, nursing, and business majors. We describe specific interventions to alleviate science anxiety.

science anxiety nonscience majors gender 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AAUW (1992). How Schools Shortchange Girls, American Association of University Women, Wellesley College Center for Research on Women, Wellesley, MA and AAUW Educational Foundation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Alpert, R., and Haber, R. N. (1960). Anxiety in academic achievement situations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 61: 207–215.Google Scholar
  3. Alvaro, R. (1978). The Effectiveness of a Science-Therapy Program on Science-Anxious Undergraduates, PhD dissertation, Loyola University Chicago.Google Scholar
  4. Barnes, G. (1977). Scores on a Piaget-type questionnaire vs. semester grades for lower division college physics students. American Journal of Physics 45: 841–847.Google Scholar
  5. Barnes, G., and Barnes, G. B. (1978). Students’ scores on Piaget-type questionnaires before and after taking one semester of college physics. American Journal of Physics 46: 807–809.Google Scholar
  6. Beyer, K. (1991). Gender, science anxiety and learning style. Contributions to the Sixth GASAT (Gender and Science and Technology) Conference.Google Scholar
  7. Beyer, K. (1992). Det er ikke taenkning det hele (Thinking isn’t everything.). In Paulsen, A. Chr., and Nielsen, H. (Eds.), Om Undervisning i Fysik–den Konstruktivistiske Idé (On Physics Education: the Constructivist Idea. In Danish), Gyldendal, Copenhagen, pp. 118–158.Google Scholar
  8. Beyer, K., Blegaa, S. and Vedelsby, M. (1985). Sex-roles and physics education. Contributions to the Third GASAT Conference.Google Scholar
  9. Beyer, K., Blegaa, S., Olsen, B., Reich, J., and Vedelsby, M. (1988). Piger og Fysik, IMFUFA Texts, Roskilde University Center, Roskilde, DK.Females and Physics. In DanishGoogle Scholar
  10. Beyer, K., and Reich, J. (1987). Why are many girls inhibited from learning scientific concepts in physics? Contributions to the Fourth GASAT Conference.Google Scholar
  11. Beyer, K., and Vedelsby, M. (1983). Girls and physics–a Danish project. Contributions to the Second GASAT Conference.Google Scholar
  12. Brownlow, S., Jacobi, T., and Rogers, M. (2000). Science anxiety as a function of gender and experience. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 42: 119–131.Google Scholar
  13. Brownlow, S., Smith, T. J., and Ellis, B. R. (2002). How interest in science negatively influences perception of women. Journal of Science Education and Technology 11: 135–144.Google Scholar
  14. Brush, S. G. (1991). Women in science and engineering. American Scientist 79: 404–419.Google Scholar
  15. Chiarelott, L., and Czerniak, C. (1985). Science anxiety among elementary school students: an equity issue. Journal Education Equity and Leadership 5: 291–308.Google Scholar
  16. Chiarelott, L., and Czerniak, C. (1987). Science anxiety: Implications for science curriculum and teaching. The Clearing House 60: 202–205.Google Scholar
  17. Claussen, C. (2004). Danish Ministry of Education, private communication.Google Scholar
  18. Cohen, H. D., Hillman, D. F., and Agne, R. M. (1978). Cognitive level and college physics achievement. American Journal of Physics 46: 1026–1029.Google Scholar
  19. Curtin, J., Blake, G., Cassagnau, C. (1997). 1995–1996 Academic Workforce Report, American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD.Google Scholar
  20. Ellis, A. (1962). Reason and Emotion in Psychotherapy, Lyle Stuart, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Fuller, R., Agruso, S., Mallow, J., Nichols, D., Sapp, R., Strassenburg, A. and Allen, G. (1985). Developing Student Confidence in Physics, American Association of Physics Teachers, College Park, MD.Google Scholar
  22. Gauld, C. F. (1979). Physics teaching and cognitive functioning-a neo-Piagetian perspective. The Physics Teacher 17: 513–518.Google Scholar
  23. Genshaft, J. L. (1982). The use of cognitive behavior therapy for reducing math anxiety. School Psychology Review 11: 32–34.Google Scholar
  24. Hake, R. (1998). Interactive engagement vs. traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics 66: 64–74.Google Scholar
  25. Hall, D. W., Davis, N. B., Bolen, L. M., and Chia, R. (1999). Gender and racial differences in mathematical performance. Journal of Social Psychology 139: 677–689.Google Scholar
  26. Harrington, J., Davis, J., and Harrington, S. A. (1992). The use of PPST math scores to improve math skills for teacher education students. Education 112: 523–528.Google Scholar
  27. Hermes, J. (1985). The Comparative Effectiveness of a Science Anxiety Group and a Stress Management Program in the Treatment of Science-Anxious College Students, PhD dissertation, Loyola University Chicago.Google Scholar
  28. Ho, H. Z., Senturk, D., Lam, S. G., Zimmer, J. M., Hong, S., Okamoto, Y., Chiu, S., Nakazawa, Y., and Wang, C. (2000). The affective and cognitive dimensions of math anxiety: A cross-national study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 31: 362–379.Google Scholar
  29. Ivie, R. (2004). Women in physics and astronomy. AAPT Announcer 33, 132.Google Scholar
  30. Jacobson, E. (1938). Progressive Relaxation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  31. Johnson, S., and Murphy, P. (1984). The underachievement of girls in physics: towards explanations. European Journal of Science Education 6: 401–411.Google Scholar
  32. Jones, M. G., and Wheatley, J. (1988). Factors influencing the entry of women into science and related fields. Science Education 72: 127–142.Google Scholar
  33. Jones, M. G., and Wheatley, J. (1990). Gender differences in teacher–student interactions in science classrooms. Journal Research for Science Teaching 27: 861–874.Google Scholar
  34. Kelly, A., (Ed.), (1981). The Missing Half: Girls and Science Education, Manchester University Press, Manchester.Google Scholar
  35. Mallow, J. V. (1986). Science Anxiety: Fear of Science and How to Overcome It (revised edition, H&H Publications, Clearwater, FL.Google Scholar
  36. Mallow, J. V. (1991). Reading science. Journal of Reading 34: 324–338.Google Scholar
  37. Mallow, J. V. (1993). The science learning climate: Danish female and male students’ descriptions. Contributions to the Seventh GASAT Conference.Google Scholar
  38. Mallow, J. V. (1994). Gender-related science anxiety: A first binational study. Journal of Science Education and Technology 3: 227–238.Google Scholar
  39. Mallow, J. V. (1995). Students’ confidence and teachers’ styles: A binational comparison. American Journal of Physics 63: 1007–1011.Google Scholar
  40. Mallow, J. V. (1997). Science anxiety, nationality, and gender. Proceedings of the 16th Nordic Congress of Physics, Chemistry, and Mathematics Teachers (LMFK), Linköping, Sweden, pp. 83–96.Google Scholar
  41. Mallow, J. V. (1998). Student attitudes and enrolments in physics, with emphasis on gender, nationality, and science anxiety. In Jensen, J. H., Niss, M., and Wedege, T. (Eds.) Justification and Enrolment Problems in Education Involving Mathematics or Physics, Roskilde University Press, Roskilde, DK, pp. 237–258.Google Scholar
  42. Mallow, J. V., and Greenburg, S. L. (1982). Science anxiety: causes and remedies. Journal of College Science Teaching 11: 356–358.Google Scholar
  43. Mallow, J. V., and Hake, R. R. (2002). Gender Issues in Physics/Science Education (GIPSE)–Some Annotated References. From http://www.physics.indiana.edu/∼hake/GIPSE-4b.pdfGoogle Scholar
  44. Neuschatz, M., and Alpert, L. (1996). Overcoming Inertia: High School Physics in the 1990s (R-397), American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD.Google Scholar
  45. NSF (1996). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 1996 (NSF 96-311), National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  46. Piaget, J. (1967). The Psychology of Intelligence, Routledge and Paul, London, p. 148.Google Scholar
  47. Renner, J. W., Stafford, D. G., Lawson, A. E., McKinnon, J. W., Friot, F. E., and Kellog, D. H. (1976). Research, Teaching, and Learning with the Piaget Model, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK.Google Scholar
  48. Richardon, R. C., and Suinn, R. M. (1972). The mathematics anxiety rating scale: Psychometric data. Journal Counselling for Psychology 19: 551–554.Google Scholar
  49. Schneider, W.J., and Nevid, J.S. (1993). Overcoming math anxiety–a comparison of stress inoculation training and systematic-desensitization. Journal of College Student Development 34: 283–288, and references therein.Google Scholar
  50. Seymour, E., and Hewitt, N. (1997, 2000). Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates leave the Sciences, Westview Press, Boulder, CO. Hardcover (1997), Paperback (2000).Google Scholar
  51. Segal, S. (1987). Is female math anxiety real? Science 237, 350.Google Scholar
  52. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., and Lushene, R. E. (1970). STAI Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Consulting Psychologist Press, CA.Google Scholar
  53. Tobias, S. (1978). Overcoming Math Anxiety, Norton, New York, Succeed with Math, The College Board, New York.Google Scholar
  54. Tobias, S. (1985). Managing math anxiety: A new look at an old problem. Children Today. September–October: 7–9; Physics Today, June, p. 60.Google Scholar
  55. Tobias, S., Urry, M., and Venkatesan, A. (2002). Physics: for women, the last frontier. Science 296, 1201.Google Scholar
  56. Udo, M. K., Ramsey, G. P., Reynolds-Alpert, S., and Mallow, J. V. (2001). Does physics teaching affect gender-based science anxiety? Journal of Science Education and Technology 10: 237–247.Google Scholar
  57. Vedelsby, M. (1991). Myter og Realiteter: Kvinder i naturvidenskabelige og teknologiske uddannelser (Myths and Realities: Women in Scientific and Technological Education. In Danish), Forskningspolitisk Råd, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  58. Whitten, B. L., Foster, S. R., and Duncombe, M. I. (2003). What works for women in undergraduate physics? Physics Today 56: 46–51.Google Scholar
  59. Yater, J. (1986). Math anxiety and physics. Physics Today 39, 15 and replies therein.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsLoyola University ChicagoChicago

Personalised recommendations