Advertisement

Journal of Statistical Physics

, Volume 177, Issue 4, pp 717–726 | Cite as

A Proof of the Bloch Theorem for Lattice Models

  • Haruki WatanabeEmail author
Article

Abstract

The Bloch theorem is a powerful theorem stating that the expectation value of the U(1) current operator averaged over the entire space vanishes in large quantum systems. The theorem applies to the ground state and to the thermal equilibrium at a finite temperature, irrespective of the details of the Hamiltonian as far as all terms in the Hamiltonian are finite ranged. In this work we present a simple yet rigorous proof for general lattice models. For large but finite systems, we find that both the discussion and the conclusion are sensitive to the boundary condition one assumes: under the periodic boundary condition, one can only prove that the current expectation value is inversely proportional to the linear dimension of the system, while the current expectation value completely vanishes before taking the thermodynamic limit when the open boundary condition is imposed. We also provide simple tight-binding models that clarify the limitation of the theorem in dimensions higher than one.

Keywords

Bloch theorem Persistent current Many-body systems 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank S. Bachmann, A. Kapustin, and L. Trifunovic for useful discussions on this topic. In particular, I learned the generalization to the Gibbs state from the authors of Ref. [6] and I am indebted to their email correspondence. I also thank T. Momoi for informing us of Ref. [4]. This work is supported by JST PRESTO Grant No. JPMJPR18LA.

References

  1. 1.
    Bohm, D.: Note on a theorem of Bloch concerning possible causes of superconductivity. Phys. Rev. 75, 502 (1949)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ohashi, Y., Momoi, T.: On the Bloch theorem concerning spontaneous electric current. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 3254 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yamamoto, N.: Generalized Bloch theorem and chiral transport phenomena. Phys. Rev. D 92, 085011 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hikihara, T., Kecke, L., Momoi, T., Furusaki, A.: Vector chiral and multipolar orders in the spin-1 2 frustrated ferromagnetic chain in magnetic field. Phys. Rev. B 78, 144404 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tada, Y., Koma, T.: Two No-Go theorems on superconductivity. J. Stat. Phys. 165, 455 (2016)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bachmann, S., Bols, A., Roeck, W.D., Fraas, M.: A many-body index for quantum charge transport. Commun. Math. Phys. (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-019-03537-x
  7. 7.
    Lieb, E., Schultz, T., Mattis, D.: Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain. Ann. Phys. 16, 407 (1961)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jaynes, E.T.: Information theory and statistical mechanics. II. Phys. Rev. 106, 620 (1957)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Takahiro, S.: Second law-like inequalities with quantum relative entropy: an introduction. In: Nakahara, M. (ed.) Lectures on Quantum Computing, Thermodynamics and Statistical Physics, pp. 125–190. World scientific, Singapore (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Affleck, I., Lieb, E.H.: A proof of part of Haldane’s conjecture on spin chains. Lett. Math. Phys. 12, 57 (1986)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yamanaka, M., Oshikawa, M., Affleck, I.: Nonperturbative approach to Luttinger’s theorem in one dimension. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1110 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koma, T.: Spectral gaps of quantum Hall systems with interactions. J. Stat. Phys. 99, 313 (2000)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cheung, H.-F., Gefen, Y., Riedel, E.K., Shih, W.-H.: Persistent currents in small one-dimensional metal rings. Phys. Rev. B 37, 6050 (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oshikawa, M., Yamanaka, M., Affleck, I.: Magnetization plateaus in spin chains: “Haldane gap” for half-integer spins. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1984 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kapustin, A., Spodyneiko, L.: Absence of energy currents in an equilibrium state and chiral anomalies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 060601 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.060601 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Watanabe, H., Oshikawa, M.: Inequivalent Berry phases for the bulk polarization. Phys. Rev. X 8, 021065 (2018)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jackson, J.D.: Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York (1999)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied PhysicsUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations