Journal of Statistical Physics

, Volume 168, Issue 1, pp 15–42 | Cite as

Random Evolutionary Dynamics Driven by Fitness and House-of-Cards Mutations: Sampling Formulae

Article

Abstract

We first revisit the multi-allelic mutation-fitness balance problem, especially when mutations obey a house of cards condition, where the discrete-time deterministic evolutionary dynamics of the allelic frequencies derives from a Shahshahani potential. We then consider multi-allelic Wright–Fisher stochastic models whose deviation to neutrality is from the Shahshahani mutation/selection potential. We next focus on the weak selection, weak mutation cases and, making use of a Gamma calculus, we compute the normalizing partition functions of the invariant probability densities appearing in their Wright–Fisher diffusive approximations. Using these results, generalized Ewens sampling formulae (ESF) from the equilibrium distributions are derived. We start treating the ESF in the mixed mutation/selection potential case and then we restrict ourselves to the ESF in the simpler house-of-cards mutations only situation. We also address some issues concerning sampling problems from infinitely-many alleles weak limits.

Keywords

Evolutionary genetics Fitness landscape House-of-cards mutations Shahshahani gradient Wright–Fisher random genetic drift Gamma calculus Generalized Ewens sampling formulae 

Notes

Acknowledgements

T. Huillet acknowledges partial support both from the “Chaire Modélisation mathématique et biodiversité” and the labex MME-DII Center of Excellence (Modèles mathématiques et économiques de la dynamique, de l’incertitude et des interactions, ANR-11-LABX-0023-01 project).

References

  1. 1.
    Barbour, A.D., Ethier, S.N., Griffiths, R.C.: A transition function expansion for a diffusion model with selection. Ann. Appl. Prob. 10(1), 123–162 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bürger, R.: The Mathematical Theory of Selection, Recombination, and Mutation. Wiley Series in Mathematical and Computational Biology. Wiley, Chichester (2000)MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Castilloux, A.M., Lessard, S.: The fundamental theorem of natural selection in Ewens’ sense (case of many loci). Theor. Popul. Biol. 48(3), 306–315 (1995)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Charlesworth, B., Jain, K.: Purifying selection, drift, and reversible mutation with arbitrarily high mutation rates. Genetics 198(4), 1587–1602 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Edalat, A. Shahshahani gradients. http://sharif.edu/~shahyad/edalat.pdf
  6. 6.
    Ethier, S.N., Kurtz, T.G.: Markov Processes. Characterization and Convergence. Wiley, New York (1986)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Evans, S.N.: Diffusions on the Simplex from Brownian Motions on Hypersurfaces. Lecture Notes-Monograph Series. Institute of Mathematical, Statistics, Beachwood (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ewens, W.J.: Mathematical Population Genetics. I. Theoretical Introduction. Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, vol. 27, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2004)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ewens, W.J.: The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. Theoret. Popul. Biol. 3, 87–112 (1972)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ewens, W.J., Li, W.H.: Frequency spectra of neutral and deleterious alleles in a finite population. J. Math. Biol. 10(2), 155–166 (1980)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feng, S.: Diffusion processes and the Ewens sampling formula. Stat. Sci. 31(1), 20–22 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Griffiths, R.C.: Allele frequencies with genic selection. J. Math. Biol. 17(1), 1–10 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Handa, K.: Sampling formulae for symmetric selection. Electron. Commun. Probab. 10, 223–234 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hermisson, J., Redner, O., Wagner, H., Baake, E.: Mutation-selection balance: ancestry, load and maximum principle. Theor. Pop. Biol. 62(1), 9–46 (2002)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hofbauer, J.: The selection mutation equation. J. Math. Biol. 1985(23), 41–53 (1985)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huillet, T.: Sampling formulae arising from random Dirichlet populations. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 34(5), 1019–1040 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huillet, T.: Ewens sampling formulae with and without selection. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 206, 755–773 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huillet, T., Martinez, S.: Sampling from finite random partitions. Meth. Comput. Appl. Prob. 5(4), 467–492 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huillet, T., Martinez, S.: Dirichlet-Kingman partition revisited. Far East J. Theor. Stat. 24(1), 1–33 (2008)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huillet, T., Martinez, S.: Discrete evolutionary genetics: multiplicative fitnesses and the mutation-fitness balance. Appl. Math. 2(1), 11–22 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Karlin, S.: Mathematical models, problems, and controversies of evolutionary theory. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 10(2), 221–273 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kingman, J.F.C.: Mathematics of genetic diversity. In: CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, vol. 34. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia (1980). ISBN: 0-89871-166-5Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kingman, J.F.C.: Poisson Processes. Oxford Studies in Probability, vol. 3. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1993)MATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li, W.H.: Maintenance of genetic variability under mutation and selection pressures in a finite population. PNAS 74(6), 2509–2513 (1977)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li, W.H.: Maintenance of genetic variability under the joint effect of mutation, selection and random drift. Genetics 90(2), 349–382 (1978)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    O’Brien, P.: A genetic model with mutation and selection. Math. Biosci. 73(2), 239–251 (1985)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Okasha, S.: Fisher’s fundamental theorem of natural selection—a philosophical analysis. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 59(3), 319–351 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Price, G.R.: Fisher’s fundamental theorem made clear. Ann. Hum. Genet. Lond. 36(2), 129–140 (1972)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rannala, B.: Stationary Allele Frequency Distributions. Wiley, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shahshahani, S.: A New Mathematical Framework for the Study of Linkage and Selection, vol. 17. American Mathematical Society, New York (1979)MATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Svirezhev, Y.M.: Optimum principles in genetics. In: Ratner, V.A. (ed.) Studies on Theoretical Genetics, pp. 86–102. USSR Academy of Science, Novosibirsk (1972)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tran, T.D., Hofrichter, J., Jost, J.: The free energy method for the Fokker-Planck equation of the Wright-Fisher model. Preprint No. 29, Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften, Leipzig (2015)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Watterson, G.A.: The stationary distribution of the infinitely-many neutral alleles diffusion model. J. Appl. Prob. 13(4), 639–651 (1976)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Watterson, G.A.: Heterosis or neutrality? Genetics 85(4), 789–814 (1977)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Watterson, G.A.: An analysis of multi-allelic data. Genetics 88(1), 171–179 (1978)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Watterson, G.A.: Motoo Kimura’s use of diffusion theory in population genetics. Theor. Pop. Biol. 49(2), 154–188 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wright, S.: In: Jepsen, G.L., Simpson, G.G., Mayr, E. (eds.) Genetics, Paleontology and Evolution, pp. 365–389. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1949)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zeng, Z.B., Tachida, H., Cockerham, C.C.: Effects of mutation on selection limits in finite populations with multiple alleles. Genetics 122(4), 977–984 (1989)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhou, Y.: Asymptotic theory for three infinite dimensional diffusion processes. Open Access Dissertations and Theses, Paper No. 8514, McMaster University (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Modélisation, CNRS-UMR 8089 et Université de Cergy-PontoiseCergy-PontoiseFrance

Personalised recommendations