Advertisement

Journal of Statistical Physics

, Volume 166, Issue 3–4, pp 618–649 | Cite as

On Unique Ergodicity in Nonlinear Stochastic Partial Differential Equations

  • Nathan Glatt-Holtz
  • Jonathan C. MattinglyEmail author
  • Geordie Richards
Article

Abstract

We illustrate how the notion of asymptotic coupling provides a flexible and intuitive framework for proving the uniqueness of invariant measures for a variety of stochastic partial differential equations whose deterministic counterpart possesses a finite number of determining modes. Examples exhibiting parabolic and hyperbolic structure are studied in detail. In the later situation we also present a simple framework for establishing the existence of invariant measures when the usual approach relying on the Krylov–Bogolyubov procedure and compactness fails.

Keywords

Ergodicity Coupling SPDEs Stochastic fluid equations 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the National Science Foundation under the Grant (NEGH) NSF-DMS-1313272. JCM was partially supported by the Simons Foundation. We would like to thank Peter Constantin, Michele Coti-Zelati, Juraj Földes and Vlad Vicol for helpful feedback. We would also like to express our appreciation to the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute (MSRI) as well as the Duke and Virginia Tech Math Departments where the majority of this work was carried out.

References

  1. 1.
    Albeverio, S., Flandoli, F., Sinai, Y.G.: SPDE in hydrodynamic: recent progress and prospects, vol. 1942 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin (2008). In: Da Prato G., Röckner M. (eds.) Lectures given at the C.I.M.E. Summer School held in Cetraro, Aug 29–Sept 3 2005Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bishop, A.R., Fesser, K., Lomdahl, P.S., Trullinger, S.E.: Influence of solitons in the initial state on chaos in the driven damped Sine–Gordon system. Phys. D Nonlinear Phenom. 7(1), 259–279 (1983)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bricmont, J., Kupiainen, A., Lefevere, R.: Ergodicity of the 2D Navier–Stokes equations with random forcing. Commun. Math. Phys. 224(1), 65–81 (2001). Dedicated to Joel L. LebowitzADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bricmont, J., Kupiainen, A., Lefevere, R.: Exponential mixing of the 2D stochastic Navier–Stokes dynamics. Commun. Math. Phys. 230(1), 87–132 (2002)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bishop, A.R., Lomdahl, P.S.: Nonlinear dynamics in driven, damped Sine–Gordon systems. Phys. D Nonlinear Phenom. 18(1), 54–66 (1986)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bakhtin, Y., Mattingly, J.C.: Stationary solutions of stochastic differential equations with memory and stochastic partial differential equations. Commun. Contemp. Math. 7(5), 553–582 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Constantin, P., Foias, C.: Navier–Stokes Equations. Chicago Lectures in Mathematics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL (1988)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Constantin, P., Glatt-Holtz, N., Vicol, V.: Unique ergodicity for fractionally dissipated, stochastically forced 2D Euler equations. Commun. Math. Phys. 330, 819 (2014)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheskidov, A., Holm, D.D., Olson, E., Titi, E.S.: On a leray–\(\alpha \) model of turbulence. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, vol. 461, pp. 629–649. The Royal Society (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Caraballo, T., Kloeden, P.E., Real, J.: Pullback and forward attractors for a damped wave equation with delays. Stoch. Dyn. 4(03), 405–423 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cao, Y., Lunasin, E.M., Titi, E.S.: Global well-posedness of the three-dimensional viscous and inviscid simplified bardina turbulence models. arXiv preprint arXiv:physics/0608096 (2006)
  12. 12.
    Cao, C., Titi, E.S.: Global well-posedness of the three-dimensional viscous primitive equations of large scale ocean and atmosphere dynamics. Ann. Math. (2) 166(1), 245–267 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Debussche, A., Glatt-Holtz, N., Temam, R.: Local martingale and pathwise solutions for an abstract fluids model. Physica D 240(Issues 1415, 2011), 1123–1144 (2011)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Debussche, A., Glatt-Holtz, N., Temam, R., Ziane, M.: Global existence and regularity for the 3d stochastic primitive equations of the ocean and atmosphere with multiplicative white noise. Nonlinearity 25(7), 2093 (2012)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dickey, R.W.: Stability theory for the damped Sine–Gordon equation. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 30(2), 248–262 (1976)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Di Molfetta, G., Krstlulovic, G., Brachet, M.: Self-truncation and scaling in euler-voigt-\(\alpha \) and related fluid models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.05544 (2015)
  17. 17.
    Debussche, A., Odasso, C.: Ergodicity for a weakly damped stochastic non-linear Schrödinger equation. J. Evol. Equ. 5(3), 317–356 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Da Prato, G., Zabczyk, J.: Ergodicity for Infinite-Dimensional Systems. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 229. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ewald, B., Petcu, M., Temam, R.: Stochastic solutions of the two-dimensional primitive equations of the ocean and atmosphere with an additive noise. Anal. Appl. 5(2), 183–198 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fan, X.: Random attractor for a damped Sine–Gordon equation with white noise. Pac. J. Math. 216(1), 63–76 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Földes, J., Glatt-Holtz, N., Richards, G., Thomann, E.: Ergodic and mixing properties of the Boussinesq equations with a degenerate random forcing. J. Funct. Anal. 269(8), 2427–2504 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Foias, C., Holm, D.D., Titi, E.S.: The three dimensional viscous camassa-holm equations, and their relation to the Navier–Stokes equations and turbulence theory. J. Dyn. Differ. Equ. 14(1), 1–35 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fomin, S.W., Kornfel’d, I.P., Sinai, Y.G.: Teoria ergodyczna. Translated from the Russian by Jacek Jakubowski. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe (PWN), Warsaw (1987)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Foias, C., Prodi, G.: Sur le comportement global des solutions non-stationnaires des équations de Navier–Stokes en dimension \(2\). Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova 39, 1–34 (1967)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Glatt-Holtz, N., Kukavica, I., Vicol, V., Ziane, M.: Existence and regularity of invariant measures for the three dimensional stochastic primitive equations. J. Math. Phys. 55(5), 051504 (2014)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Glatt-Holtz, N., Temam, R.: Cauchy convergence schemes for some nonlinear partial differential equations. Appl. Anal. 90(1), 85–102 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Glatt-Holtz, N., Temam, R.: Pathwise solutions of the 2-d stochastic primitive equations. Appl. Math. Optim. 63(3), 401–433 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Glatt-Holtz, N., Temam, R., Wang, C.: Martingale and pathwise solutions to the stochastic Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation with multiplicative noise. arXiv preprint arXiv:1307.6803 (2013)
  29. 29.
    Glatt-Holtz, N., Ziane, M.: The stochastic primitive equations in two space dimensions with multiplicative noise. Discret. Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 10(4), 801–822 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ghidaglia, J.-M., Temam, R.: Attractors for damped nonlinear hyperbolic equations. Journal de mathématiques pures et appliquées 66(3), 273–319 (1987)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hairer, M.: Exponential mixing properties of stochastic PDEs through asymptotic coupling. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 124(3), 345–380 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hairer, M., Mattingly, J.C.: Ergodicity of the 2D Navier–Stokes equations with degenerate stochastic forcing. Ann. Math. (2) 164(3), 993–1032 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hairer, M., Mattingly, J.C.: Spectral gaps in Wasserstein distances and the 2D stochastic Navier–Stokes equations. Ann. Probab. 36(6), 2050–2091 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hairer, M., Mattingly, J.C.: A theory of hypoellipticity and unique ergodicity for semilinear stochastic pdes. Electron. J. Probab. 16(23), 658–738 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hairer, M., Mattingly, J.C., Scheutzow, M.: Asymptotic coupling and a general form of Harris’ theorem with applications to stochastic delay equations. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 149(1—-2), 223–259 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kallenberg, O.: Foundations of modern probability. In: Probability and its Applications, 2nd edn. (New York). Springer, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kobelkov, G.M.: Existence of a solution “in the large” for ocean dynamics equations. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 9(4), 588–610 (2007)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Komorowski, T., Peszat, S., Szarek, T.: On ergodicity of some markov processes. Ann. Probab. 38(4), 1401–1443 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kuksin, S., Shirikyan, A.: A coupling approach to randomly forced nonlinear PDE’s. I. Commun. Math. Phys. 221(2), 351–366 (2001)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kuksin, S., Shirikyan, A.: Coupling approach to white-forced nonlinear PDEs. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 81(6), 567–602 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kuksin, S., Shirikyan, A.: Mathematics of Two-Dimensional Turbulence. Number 194 in Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kalantarov, V.K., Titi, E.S.: Global attractors and determining modes for the 3d Navier–Stokes–Voight equations. Chinese Ann. Math. Ser. B 30(6), 697–714 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kovačič, Gregor, Wiggins, Stephen: Orbits homoclinic to resonances, with an application to chaos in a model of the forced and damped Sine–Gordon equation. Phys. D Nonlinear Phenom. 57(1), 185–225 (1992)ADSMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kukavica, I., Ziane, M.: On the regularity of the primitive equations of the ocean. Nonlinearity 20(12), 2739–2753 (2007)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Leray, J.: Sur le mouvement d’un liquide visqueux emplissant l’espace. Acta Math. 63(1), 193–248 (1934)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Levi, M., Hoppensteadt, F.C., Miranker, W.L.: Dynamics of the josephson junction. Q. Appl. Math. 37(3), 167–198 (1978)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Layton, W., Lewandowski, R.: On a well-posed turbulence model. Discret. Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 6(1), 111 (2006)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Larios, A., Titi, E.S.: On the higher-order global regularity of the inviscid voigt-regularization of three-dimensional hydrodynamic models. arXiv preprint arXiv:0910.3354 (2009)
  49. 49.
    Lions, J.-L., Temam, R., Wang, S.: New formulations of the primitive equations of atmosphere and applications. Nonlinearity 5(2), 237–288 (1992)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lions, J.-L., Temam, R., Wang, S.: On the equations of the large-scale ocean. Nonlinearity 5(5), 1007–1053 (1992)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lions, J.L., Temam, R., Wang, S.: Models for the coupled atmosphere and ocean. (CAO I, II). Comput. Mech. Adv. 1(1), 120 (1993)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Mattingly, J.C.: Exponential convergence for the stochastically forced Navier–Stokes equations and other partially dissipative dynamics. Commun. Math. Phys. 230(3), 421–462 (2002)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Mattingly, J.C.: On recent progress for the stochastic Navier–Stokes equations. In Journées “Équations aux Dérivées Partielles”, pages Exp. No. XI, 52. Univ. Nantes, Nantes (2003)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Marsden, J.E., Shkoller, S.: Global well-posedness for the lagrangian averaged Navier–Stokes (lans-\(\alpha \)) equations on bounded domains. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 359(1784), 1449–1468 (2001)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Marsden, J.E., Shkoller, S.: The anisotropic lagrangian averaged euler and Navier–Stokes equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 166(1), 27–46 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Muscalu, C., Schlag, W.: Classical and Multilinear Harmonic Analysis, vol. 137. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Oskolkov, A.P.: The uniqueness and global solvability of boundary-value problems for the equations of motion for aqueous solutions of polymers. J. Math. Sci. 8(4), 427–455 (1977)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Pedlosky, J.: Geophysical Fluid Dynamics. Springer, Berlin (2013)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Petcu, M., Temam, R., Ziane, M.: Some mathematical problems in geophysical fluid dynamics. In: Special Volume on Computational Methods for the Atmosphere and the Oceans, volume 14 of Handbook of Numerical Analysis, pp. 577–750. Elsevier (2008)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Revuz, D., Yor, M.: Continuous martingales and Brownian motion, Volume 293 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin (1999)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Temam, R.: Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems in Mechanics and Physics, Volume 68 of Applied Mathematical Sciences, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Temam, R.: Navier–Stokes Equations: Theory and Numerical Analysis. AMS Chelsea Publishing, Providence, RI (2001). Reprint of the 1984 editionGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Trenberth, K.E.: Climate System Modeling. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Weinan, E., Mattingly, J.C., Sinai, Y.: Gibbsian dynamics and ergodicity for the stochastically forced Navier–Stokes equation. Commun. Math. Phys. 224(1), 83–106 (2001). Dedicated to Joel L. LebowitzADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Weinan, E., Liu, D.: Gibbsian dynamics and invariant measures for stochastic dissipative PDEs. J. Stat. Phys. 108(5–6):1125–1156 (2002). Dedicated to David Ruelle and Yasha Sinai on the occasion of their 65th birthdaysGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Wang, G., Zhu, S.: On the dimension of the global attractor for the damped sine-Gordon equation. J. Math. Phys. 38(6), 3137–3141 (1997)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tulane UniversityNew OrleansUSA
  2. 2.Duke UniversityDurhamUSA
  3. 3.Utah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations