Journal of Statistical Physics

, Volume 157, Issue 4–5, pp 990–1016 | Cite as

Random Vector and Matrix Theories: A Renormalization Group Approach

Article

Abstract

The study of the statistical properties of random matrices of large size has a long history, dating back to Wigner, who suggested using Gaussian ensembles to give a statistical description of the spectrum of complex Hamiltonians and derived the famous semi-circle law, the work of Dyson and many others. Later, ’t Hooft noticed that, in \(SU(N)\) non-Abelian gauge theories, tessalated surfaces can be associated to Feynman diagrams and that the large \(N\) expansion corresponds to an expansion in successive topologies. Following this observation, some times later, it was realized that some ensembles of random matrices in the large N expansion and the so-called double scaling limit could be used as toy models for quantum gravity: 2D quantum gravity coupled to conformal matter. This has resulted in a tremendous expansion of random matrix theory, tackled with increasingly sophisticated mathematical methods and number of matrix models have been solved exactly. However, the somewhat paradoxical situation is that either models can be solved exactly or little can be said. Since the solved models display critical points and universal properties, it is tempting to use renormalization group ideas to determine universal properties, without solving models explicitly. Initiated by Brézin and Zinn-Justin, the approach has led to encouraging results, first for matrix integrals and then quantum mechanics with matrices, but has not yet become a universal tool as initially hoped. In particular, general quantum field theories with matrix fields require more detailed investigations. To better understand some of the encountered difficulties, we first apply analogous ideas to the simpler \(O(N)\) symmetric vector models, models that can be solved quite generally in the large \(N\) limit. Unlike other attempts, our method is a close extension of Brézin and Zinn-Justin. Discussing vector and matrix models with similar approximation scheme, we notice that in all cases (vector and matrix integrals, vector and matrix path integrals in the local approximation), at leading order, non-trivial fixed points satisfy the same universal algebraic equation, and this is the main result of this work. However, its precise meaning and role have still to be better understood.

Keywords

Renormalization group Random matrices Critical phenomena Path integrals 

References

  1. 1.
    Moshe, M., Zinn-Justin, J.: Quantum field theory in the large N limit: a review. Phys. Rep. 385, 69–228 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Di Vecchia, P., Kato, M., Ohta, N.: Double scaling limit in O(N) vector models. Nucl. Phys. B357, 495–520 (1991)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson, A., Myers, R.C., Periwal, V.: Branched polymers from a double-scaling limit of matrix models. Nucl. Phys. B360, 463–479 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zinn-Justin, J.: O(N) vector field theories in the double scaling limit. Phys. Lett. B257, 335–430 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brézin, E., Zinn-Justin, J.: Renormalization group approach to matrix models. Phys. Lett. B288, 54–58 (1992)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilson, K.G., Kogut, J.: The renormalization group and the \(\epsilon \) expansion. Phys. Rep. 12C, 75–199 (1974)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Higuchi, S., Itoi, C., Sakai, N.: Nonlinear renormalization group equation for matrix models. Phys. Lett. B318, 63–72 (1993)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Higuchi, S., Itoi, C., Sakai, N.: Exact beta functions in the vector model and renormalization group approach. Phys. Lett. B312, 88–96 (1993)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    David, F.: Planar diagrams, two-dimensional lattice gravity and surface models. Nucl. Phys. B257, 45–58 (1985)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    David, F.: A model of random surfaces with non-trivial critical behaviour. Nucl. Phys. B257, 543–576 (1985)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kazakov, V.A.: Bilocal regularization of models of random surfaces. Phys. Lett. B150, 282–284 (1985)MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ambjørn, J., Durhuus, B., Fröhlich, J.: Diseases of triangulated random surface models, and possible cures. Nucl. Phys. B 257, 433–449 (1985)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brézin, E., Kazakov, V.A.: Exactly solvable field theories of closed strings. Phys. Lett. B236, 144–150 (1990)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Douglas, M.R., Shenker, S.H.: Strings in less than one dimension. Nucl. Phys. B235, 635–654 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gross, D.G., Migdal, A.A.: Nonperturbative two-dimensional quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 127–130 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brézin, E., Kazakov, V.A., Zamolodchikov, A.B.: Scaling violation in a field theory of closed strings in one physical dimension. Nucl. Phys. B 338, 673–688 (1990)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ginsparg, P., Zinn-Justin, J.: 2d gravity + 1d matter. Phys. Lett. B 240, 333–340 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gross, D.J., Miljkovic, N.: A nonperturbative solution of \(D = 1\) string theory. Phys. Lett. B238, 217–223 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Parisi, G.: On the one dimensional discretized string. Phys. Lett. B 238, 209–212 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Francesco, P.D., Ginsparg, P., Zinn-Justin, J.: 2D gravity and random matrices. Phys. Rept. 254, 1–133 (1995)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Higuchi, S., Itoi, C., Nishigaki, S., Sakai, N.: Nonlinear renormalization group equation for matrix models. Phys. Lett. B318, 63–72 (1993)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Higuchi, S., Itoi, C., Nishigaki, S., Sakai, N.: Renormalization group flow in one- and two-matrix models. Nucl. Phys. B434, 283–318 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Higuchi, S., Itoi, C., Nishigaki, S., Sakai, N.: Renormalization group approach to multiple-arc random matrix models. Phys. Lett. B398, 123–129 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bonnet, G., David, F.: Renormalization group for matrix models with branching interactions. Nucl. Phys. B552, 511–528 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Alfaro, J., Damgaard, P.H.: The \(D=1\) matrix model and the renormalization group. Phys. Lett. B289, 342–346 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dasgupta, S., Dasgupta, T.: Renormalization group approach to c=1 matrix model on a circle and D-brane decay. arXiv preprint hep-th/0310106
  27. 27.
    Nishigaki, S.: Wilsonian approximated renormalization group for matrix and vector models in \(2 <d <4\). Phys. Lett. B 376, 73–81 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CEA/IRFUCentre de SaclayGif-sur-Yvette CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations