Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Relation of a New Interpretation of Stochastic Differential Equations to Ito Process

Abstract

Stochastic differential equations (SDE) are widely used in modeling stochastic dynamics in literature. However, SDE alone is not enough to determine a unique process. A specified interpretation for stochastic integration is needed. Different interpretations specify different dynamics. Recently, a new interpretation of SDE is put forward by one of us. This interpretation has a built-in Boltzmann-Gibbs distribution and shows the existence of potential function for general processes, which reveals both local and global dynamics. Despite its powerful property, its relation with classical ones in arbitrary dimension remains obscure. In this paper, we will clarify such connection and derive the concise relation between the new interpretation and Ito process. We point out that the derived relation is experimentally testable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. 1.

    Ao, P.: Potential in stochastic differential equations: novel construction. J. Phys. A, Math. Gen. 37(3), L25 (2004)

  2. 2.

    Ao, P.: Emerging of stochastic dynamical equalities and steady state thermodynamics from Darwinian dynamics. Commun. Theor. Phys. 49(5), 1073–1090 (2008)

  3. 3.

    Ao, P., Galas, D., Hood, L., Yin, L., Zhu, X.: Towards predictive stochastic dynamical modeling of cancer genesis and progression. Interdiscipl. Sci. Comput. Life Sci. 2, 140–144 (2010)

  4. 4.

    Ao, P., Galas, D., Hood, L., Zhu, X.: Cancer as robust intrinsic state of endogenous molecular-cellular network shaped by evolution. Med. Hypotheses 70(3), 678–684 (2008)

  5. 5.

    Ao, P., Kwon, C., Qian, H.: On the existence of potential landscape in the evolution of complex systems. Complexity 12(4), 19–27 (2007)

  6. 6.

    Arnold, L.: Random Dynamical Systems. Springer, Berlin (2003)

  7. 7.

    Freidlin, M.: Some remarks on the Smoluchowski–Kramers approximation. J. Stat. Phys. 117, 617–634 (2004)

  8. 8.

    Gardiner, C.W.: Handbook of Stochastic Methods: For Physics, Chemistry and the Natural Sciences, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin (2004)

  9. 9.

    Hänggi, P.: On derivations and solutions of master equations and asymptotic representations. Z. Phys. B, Condens. Matter 30, 85–95 (1978)

  10. 10.

    Hottovy, S., Volpe, G., Wehr, J.: Noise-induced drift in stochastic differential equations with arbitrary friction and diffusion in the Smoluchowski-Kramers limit. J. Stat. Phys. 146, 762–773 (2012)

  11. 11.

    Jiao, S., Wang, Y., Yuan, B., Ao, P.: Kinetics of Muller’s ratchet from adaptive landscape viewpoint. In: Systems Biology (ISB), 2011 IEEE International Conference, pp. 27–32 (2011)

  12. 12.

    Karatzas, I., Shreve, S.E.: Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (1991)

  13. 13.

    Kupferman, R., Pavliotis, G.A., Stuart, A.M.: Itô versus Stratonovich white-noise limits for systems with inertia and colored multiplicative noise. Phys. Rev. E 70, 036120 (2004)

  14. 14.

    Kwon, C., Ao, P., Thouless, D.J.: Structure of stochastic dynamics near fixed points. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102(37), 13029–13033 (2005)

  15. 15.

    Kwon, C., Noh, J.D., Park, H.: Nonequilibrium fluctuations for linear diffusion dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 83, 061145 (2011)

  16. 16.

    Lyons, T.J.: Differential equations driven by rough signals. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 14(2), 215–310 (1998)

  17. 17.

    Mu, W.H., Ou-Yang, Z.C., Li, X.Q.: From chemical Langevin equations to Fokker–Planck equation: application of hodge decomposition and Klein–Kramers equation. Commun. Theor. Phys. 55(4), 602 (2011)

  18. 18.

    Øksendal, B.: Stochastic Differential Equations: An Introduction with Applications, 6th edn. Springer, Berlin (2010)

  19. 19.

    Qian, H.: Cellular biology in terms of stochastic nonlinear biochemical dynamics: emergent properties, isogenetic variations and chemical system inheritability. J. Stat. Phys. 141(6), 990–1013 (2010)

  20. 20.

    Shereshevskii, I.: On stochastic deformations of dynamical systems. J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. 17, 71–85 (2010)

  21. 21.

    Smythe, J., Moss, F., McClintock, P.V.E.: Observation of a noise-induced phase transition with an analog simulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1062–1065 (1983)

  22. 22.

    Sussmann, H.J.: On the gap between deterministic and stochastic ordinary differential equations. Ann. Probab. 6, 19–41 (1978)

  23. 23.

    Tsekov, R.: Stochastic equations for thermodynamics. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 93(9), 1751–1753 (1997)

  24. 24.

    Van Kampen, N.G.: Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1992)

  25. 25.

    Volpe, G., Helden, L., Brettschneider, T., Wehr, J., Bechinger, C.: Influence of noise on force measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104(17), 170602 (2010)

  26. 26.

    Wang, J., Xu, L., Wang, E.K.: Potential landscape and flux framework of nonequilibrium networks: robustness, dissipation, and coherence of biochemical oscillations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105(34), 12271–12276 (2008)

  27. 27.

    Wong, E., Zakai, M.: On the convergence of ordinary integrals to stochastic integrals. Ann. Math. Stat. 36(5), 1560–1564 (1965)

  28. 28.

    Yin, L., Ao, P.: Existence and construction of dynamical potential in nonequilibrium processes without detailed balance. J. Phys. A, Math. Gen. 39(27), 8593–8601 (2006)

  29. 29.

    Yuan, R., Ma, Y., Yuan, B., Ao, P.: Potential function in dynamical systems and the relation with Lyapunov function. In: 30th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), 2011, pp. 6573–6580 (2011)

  30. 30.

    Zhou, D., Qian, H.: Fixation, transient landscape, and diffusion dilemma in stochastic evolutionary game dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 84, 031907 (2011)

  31. 31.

    Zhu, X.M., Yin, L., Ao, P.: Limit cycle and conserved dynamics. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 20, 817–827 (2006)

  32. 32.

    Zhu, X.M., Yin, L., Hood, L., Ao, P.: Calculating biological behaviors of epigenetic states in the phage λ life cycle. Funct. Integr. Genomics 4(3), 188–195 (2004)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude for the helpful discussions with Song Xu, Xinan Wang, Yian Ma, Ying Tang. This work was supported in part by the National 973 Project No. 2010CB529200 (P.A.); by the Natural Science Foundation of China No. NFSC91029738 (P.A.) and No. NFSC61073087 (R.Y., J.S. and B.Y.).

Author information

Correspondence to Bo Yuan or Ping Ao.

Appendices

Appendix A: Proof of Theorem 1

Proof

We only need to consider the difference between α-type and I-type processes (α=0), the difference in drift part is given by

$$ \bigl[\boldsymbol{f}\bigl(\boldsymbol{x}(t+\alpha\,\mathrm{d}{t}) \bigr) - \boldsymbol{f}\bigl(\boldsymbol{x} (t)\bigr)\bigr]\, \mathrm{d}{t} = \mathrm{O} \bigl( \boldsymbol{x}(t+\alpha\,\mathrm{d}{t}) - \boldsymbol{x}(t) \bigr )\,\mathrm{d}{t} = \mathrm{O}\bigl( \mathrm{d}{t}^{1.5}\bigr) = \mathrm{o}(\mathrm{d}{t}). $$
(21)

This means the difference in drift part is negligible. The difference in diffusion part of ith coordinate is given by

(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)

We can use interpretation of SDE over time interval t to t+α dt to get Eq. (23). Here dW(αt) is a short notation for change of Wiener Process over time α dt. Equation (24) is given by first order expansion. We get the last equality using the following facts

(26)

Here R 1(t) and R 2(t) are zero mean noise with standard deviation of order \(\mathrm{o}(\sqrt{\mathrm{d}{t}})\). These small noise will not harm the result and can be ignored according to the following theorem.

Theorem 3

The zero mean noise in dx with standard deviation of \(\mathrm{o}(\sqrt{\mathrm{d}{t}})\) can be ignored without influencing the result of stochastic integration.

Proof

Let us denote the noise term R(t). Consider the stochastic integration of the noise term over a time interval

(27)

We can find that X is a random variable with zero mean and zero variance (due to the fact that variance of R(t) is o(dt)). This means X goes to 0 by mean-square limit. □

Appendix B: Detailed Parameters of Examples

B.1 Example 1

The SDE for the I-type process is

$$ \mathrm{d}\boldsymbol{x}= -(\boldsymbol {D}+\boldsymbol{Q})\nabla\phi\,\mathrm {d}{t} + \boldsymbol{B}\,\mathrm{d}\boldsymbol{W}(t), \qquad \boldsymbol{B} \boldsymbol{B}^\tau=2\boldsymbol{D}. $$
(28)

Here

(29)

Here k is an integer vary from 1 to 10. The A-type process for Eq. (28) is the following I-type process:

(30)

where

$$ \varDelta\boldsymbol{f}= \left ( \begin{array}{c} k \\ 0 \\ \end{array} \right ). $$
(31)

B.2 Example 2

The SDE for the I-type process is

(32)

Here

(33)

It is easy to see that the above I-type process is the equivalent I-type process for the following A-type process with same B and different ϕ:

(34)

Here

$$ \phi' = \bigl(x^2+y^2\bigr)/2. $$
(35)

So its stationary distribution is

$$ \rho\propto\exp\bigl[-\bigl(x^2+y^2\bigr)/2 \bigr]. $$
(36)

This stationary distribution has only one minimum point at origin.

The A-type process for Eq. (32) is the following I-type process:

(37)

where

$$ \varDelta\boldsymbol{f}= \left ( \begin{array}{c} x \\ y \\ \end{array} \right ). $$
(38)

And its stationary distribution is

$$ \rho\propto\exp\bigl[ \log\bigl(x^2+y^2\bigr)- \bigl(x^2+y^2\bigr)/2 \bigr]. $$
(39)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shi, J., Chen, T., Yuan, R. et al. Relation of a New Interpretation of Stochastic Differential Equations to Ito Process. J Stat Phys 148, 579–590 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-012-0532-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Stochastic differential equation
  • Boltzmann-Gibbs distribution
  • Fokker-Planck equation
  • Potential function