Journal of Statistical Physics

, Volume 147, Issue 1, pp 206–223 | Cite as

Survival Probability of Mutually Killing Brownian Motions and the O’Connell Process

Article

Abstract

Recently O’Connell introduced an interacting diffusive particle system in order to study a directed polymer model in 1+1 dimensions. The infinitesimal generator of the process is a harmonic transform of the quantum Toda-lattice Hamiltonian by the Whittaker function. As a physical interpretation of this construction, we show that the O’Connell process without drift is realized as a system of mutually killing Brownian motions conditioned that all particles survive forever. When the characteristic length of interaction killing other particles goes to zero, the process is reduced to the noncolliding Brownian motion (the Dyson model).

Keywords

Mutually killing Brownian motions Survival probability Quantum Toda lattice Whittaker functions The Dyson model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The present author would like to thank T. Sasamoto and T. Imamura for useful discussion on the present work. A part of the present work was done during the participation of the present author in École de Physique des Houches on “Vicious Walkers and Random Matrices” (May 16–27, 2011). The author thanks G. Schehr, C. Donati-Martin, and S. Péché for well-organization of the school. This work is supported in part by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (No. 21540397) of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

References

  1. 1.
    Baudoin, F., O’Connell, N.: Exponential functionals of Brownian motion and class-one Whittaker functions. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré B, Probab. Stat. 47, 1096–1120 (2011) MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borodin, A., Corwin, I.: MacDonald processes. arXiv:1111.4408 [math.PR]
  3. 3.
    Cardy, J., Katori, M.: Families of vicious walkers. J. Phys. A 36, 609–629 (2003) MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Corwin, I., O’Connell, N., Seppäläinen, T., Zygouras, N.: Tropical combinatorics and Whittaker functions. arXiv:1110.3489 [math.PR]
  5. 5.
    Dyson, F.J.: A Brownian-motion model for the eigenvalues of a random matrix. J. Math. Phys. 3, 1191–1198 (1962) MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fisher, M.E.: Walks, walls, wetting, and melting. J. Stat. Phys. 34, 667–729 (1984) ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gerasimov, A., Kharchev, S., Lebedev, D., Oblezin, S.: On a Gauss–Givental representations of quantum Toda chain wave equation. Int. Math. Res. Not. 1–23 (2006) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gerasimov, A., Lebedev, D., Oblezin, S.: Baxter operator and Archimedean Hecke algebra. Commun. Math. Phys. 284, 867–896 (2008) MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Givental, A.: Stationary phase integrals, quantum Toda lattices, flag manifolds and the mirror conjecture. In: Topics in Singular Theory. AMS Trans. Ser. 2, vol. 180, pp. 103–115. Am. Math. Soc., Rhode Island (1997) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gorsky, A., Nechaev, S., Santachiara, R., Schehr, G.: Random ballistic growth and diffusion in symmetric spaces. arXiv:1110.3524 [math-ph]
  11. 11.
    Grabiner, D.J.: Brownian motion in a Weyl chamber, non-colliding particles, and random matrices. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat. 35, 177–204 (1999) MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ishii, T., Stade, E.: New formulas for Whittaker functions on GL(n,ℝ). J. Funct. Anal. 244, 289–314 (2007) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jacquet, H.: Fonctions de Whittaker associées aux groupes de Chevalley. Bull. Soc. Math. Fr. 95, 243–309 (1967) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Joe, D., Kim, B.: Equivariant mirrors and the Virasoro conjecture for flag manifolds. Int. Math. Res. Not. 15, 859–882 (2003) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karatzas, I., Shreve, S.E.: Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (1991) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Karlin, S., McGregor, J.: Coincidence probabilities. Pac. J. Math. 9, 1141–1164 (1959) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Katori, M.: O’Connell’s process as a vicious brownian motion. Phys. Rev. E. 84, 061144 (2011). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.061144. arXiv:1110.1845 [math-ph] ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Katori, M., Tanemura, H.: Scaling limit of vicious walks and two-matrix model. Phys. Rev. E 66, 011105 (2002) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Katori, M., Tanemura, H.: Non-equilibrium dynamics of Dyson’s model with an infinite number of particles. Commun. Math. Phys. 293, 469–497 (2010) MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Katori, M., Tanemura, H.: Noncolliding processes, matrix-valued processes and determinantal processes. Sūgaku Expo. 24, 263–289 (2011). arXiv:1005.0533 [math.PR] MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kharchev, S., Lebedev, D.: Integral representation for the eigenfunctions of a quantum periodic Toda chain. Lett. Math. Phys. 50, 55–77 (1999) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kharchev, S., Lebedev, D.: Eigenfunctions of GL(N,ℝ) Toda chain: the Mellin–Barnes representation. JETP Lett. 71, 235–238 (2000) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kharchev, S., Lebedev, D.: Integral representations for the eigenfunctions of quantum open and periodic Toda chains from the QISM formalism. J. Phys. A, Math. Gen. 34, 2247–2258 (2001) MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kostant, B.: Quantisation and representation theory. In: Representation Theory of Lie Groups, Proc. SRC/LMS Research Symposium, Oxford, 1977. LMS Lecture Notes, vol. 34, pp. 287–316. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1977) Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lebedev, N.N.: Special Functions and Their Applications. Prentice-Hall, New York (1965) MATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Matsumoto, H., Yor, M.: An analogue of Pitman’s 2MX theorem for exponential wiener functionals, part I: A time-inversion approach. Nagoya Math. J. 159, 125–166 (2000) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Matsumoto, H., Yor, M.: Exponential functionals of Brownian motion. I: Probability laws at fixed time. Probab. Surv. 2, 312–347 (2005) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    O’Connell, N.: Directed polymers and the quantum toda lattice. Ann. Probab. 40, 437–458 (2012). doi: 10.1214/10-AOP632. arXiv:0910.0069 [math.PR] CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    O’Connell, N.: Whittaker functions and related stochastic processes. arXiv:1201.4849 [math.PR]
  30. 30.
    Pitman, J.W.: One-dimensional Brownian motion and the three-dimensional Bessel process. Adv. Appl. Probab. 7, 511–526 (1975) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Semenov-Tian-Shansky, M.: Quantisation of open Toda lattices. In: Arnol’d, V.I., Novikov, S.P. (eds.) Dynamical Systems VII: Integrable Systems, Nonholonomic Dynamical Systems. Encyclopedia of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 16. Springer, Berlin (1994) Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sklyanin, E.K.: The quantum Toda chain. In: Non-linear Equations in Classical and Quantum Field Theory. Lect. Notes in Physics, vol. 226, pp. 195–233. Springer, Berlin (1985) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stade, E.: On explicit integral formulas for GL(n,ℝ)-Whittaker functions. Duke Math. J. 60, 313–362 (1990) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stade, E.: Mellin transforms of GL(n,ℝ) Whittaker functions. Am. J. Math. 123, 121–161 (2001) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stanley, R.P.: Enumerative Combinatorics, vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Toda, M.: Theory of Nonlinear Lattices, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (1989) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Watson, G.N.: A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1944) MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and EngineeringChuo UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations