Journal of Statistical Physics

, Volume 142, Issue 4, pp 862–878 | Cite as

Power-Law Behavior in Geometric Characteristics of Full Binary Trees

Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Natural river networks exhibit regular scaling laws in their topological organization. Here, we investigate whether these scaling laws are unique characteristics of river networks or can be applicable to general binary tree networks. We generate numerous binary trees, ranging from purely ordered trees to completely random trees. For each generated binary tree, we analyze whether the tree exhibits any scaling property found in river networks, i.e., the power-laws in the size distribution, the length distribution, the distance-load relationship, and the power spectrum of width function. We found that partially random trees generated on the basis of two distinct types of deterministic trees, i.e., deterministic critical and supercritical trees, show contrasting characteristics. Partially random trees generated on the basis of deterministic critical trees exhibit all power-law characteristics investigated in this study with their fitted exponents close to the values observed in natural river networks over a wide range of random-degree. On the other hand, partially random trees generated on the basis of deterministic supercritical trees rarely follow scaling laws of river networks.

Keywords

Self-similarity Binary tree Network topology Hack’s law Fractals Complex network 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Burlando, B.: The fractal dimension of taxonomic systems. Journal of Theoretical Biology 146(1), 99–114 (1990) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cardy, J.L., Sugar, R.L.: Directed percolation and Reggeon field theory. Journal of Physics A 13(12), L423 (1980). doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/13/12/002 CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crave, A., Davy, P.: Scaling relationships of channel networks at large scales: examples from two large-magnitude watersheds in Brittany, France. Tectonophysics 269, 91–111 (1997) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Los Rios, P.: Power law size distribution of supercritical random trees. Europhysics Letters 56, 898–903 (2001) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dodds, P.S., Rothman, D.H.: Geometry of river networks: 1. Scaling, fluctuations, and deviations. Physical Review E 63, 016115 (2001) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goh, K.-I., Kahng, B., Kim, D.: Universal behavior of load distribution in scale-free networks. Physical Review Letters 87, 278701 (2001) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guimerà, R., Danon, L., Díaz-Guilera, A., Giralt, F., Arenas, A.: Self-similar community structure in a network of human interactions. Physical Review E 68, 065103(R) (2003) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gupta, V.K., Waymire, E.: On the formulation of an analytical approach to hydrologic response and similarity at the basin scale. Journal of Hydrology 65(1–3), 95–123 (1983) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hack, J.T.: Studies of longitudinal stream profiles in Virginia and Maryland. US Geological Survey Professional Paper, 294B (1957) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Horton, R.E.: Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin 56, 275–370 (1945) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jun, J.K., Hübler, A.H.: Formation and structure of ramified charge transportation networks in an electromechanical system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 102(3), 536–540 (2005) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kirchner, J.W.: Statistical inevitability of Horton’s laws and the apparent randomness of stream channel networks. Geology 21, 591–594 (1993) MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liao, K.H., Scheidegger, A.E.: A computer model for some branching-type phenomena in hydrology. Bulletin of the International Association of Scientific Hydrology 13, 5–13 (1968) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mandelbrot, B.B.: The Fractal Geometry of Nature, Freeman, New York (1982). pp. 480 MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marani, M., Rinaldo, A., Rigon, R., Rodríguez-Iturbe, I.: Geomorphological width functions and the random cascade. Geophysical Research Letters 21, 2123–2126 (1994) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maritan, A., Rinaldo, A., Rigon, R., Giacometti, A., Rodríguez-Iturbe, I.: Scaling laws for river networks. Physical Review E 53(2), 1510–1515 (1996) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Merté, B., Gaitzsch, P., Fritzenwanger, M., Kropf, W., Hübler, A., Lüscher, E.: Stable stationary dendritic patterns with minimal dissipation. Helvetica Phys. Acta 61, 76–79 (1988) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Niemeyer, L., Pietronero, L., Wiesmann, H.J.: Fractal dimension of dielectric breakdown. Physical Review Letters 52, 1033–1036 (1984) CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Paik, K., Kumar, P.: Inevitable self-similar topology of binary trees and their diverse hierarchical density. The European Physical Journal B 60, 247–258 (2007). doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2007-00332-y MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paik, K., Kumar, P.: Emergence of self-similar tree network organization. Complexity 13(4), 30–37 (2008). doi: 10.1002/cplx.20214 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peckham, S.D., Gupta, V.K.: A reformulation of Horton’s laws for large river networks in terms of statistical self-similarity. Water Resources Research 35(9), 2763–2777 (1999) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rigon, R., Rodríguez-Iturbe, I., Maritan, A., Giacometti, A., Tarboton, D.G., Rinaldo, A.: On Hack’s law. Water Resources Research 32, 3367–3374 (1996) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rodríguez-Iturbe, I., Ijjasz-Vásquez, E.J., Bras, R.L., Tarboton, D.G.: Power law distributions of discharge mass and energy in river basins. Water Resources Research 28, 1089–1093 (1992) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Troutman, B.M., Karlinger, M.R.: On the expected width function for topologically random channel networks. Journal of Applied Probability 21(4), 836–849 (1984) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Turcotte, D.L., Pelletier, J.D., Newman, W.I.: Networks with side branching in biology. Journal of Theoretical Biology 193, 577–592 (1998) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature (London) 393, 440–442 (1998) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Werner, C., Smart, J.S.: Some new methods of topologic classification of channel networks. Geographical Analysis 5, 271–295 (1973) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zamir, M.: On fractal properties of arterial trees. Journal of Theoretical Biology 197, 517–526 (1999) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural EngineeringKorea UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Environmental Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations