Journal of Statistical Physics

, Volume 133, Issue 2, pp 281–345 | Cite as

Potts Models in the Continuum. Uniqueness and Exponential Decay in the Restricted Ensembles

  • Anna De Masi
  • Immacolata Merola
  • Errico Presutti
  • Yvon Vignaud
Article

Abstract

In this paper we study a continuum version of the Potts model, where particles are points in ℝ d , d≥2, with a spin which may take S≥3 possible values. Particles with different spins repel each other via a Kac pair potential of range γ −1, γ>0. In mean field, for any inverse temperature β there is a value of the chemical potential λ β at which S+1 distinct phases coexist. We introduce a restricted ensemble for each mean field pure phase which is defined so that the empirical particles densities are close to the mean field values. Then, in the spirit of the Dobrushin-Shlosman theory (Dobrushin and Shlosman in J. Stat. Phys. 46(5–6):983–1014, 1987), we prove that while the Dobrushin high-temperatures uniqueness condition does not hold, yet a finite size condition is verified for γ small enough which implies uniqueness and exponential decay of correlations. In a second paper (De Masi et al. in Coexistence of ordered and disordered phases in Potts models in the continuum, 2008), we will use such a result to implement the Pirogov-Sinai scheme proving coexistence of S+1 extremal DLR measures.

Keywords

Continuum particle systems Disagreement percolation Dobrushin-Shlosman condition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bodineau, T., Presutti, E.: Phase diagram of Ising systems with additional long range forces. Commun. Math. Phys. 189, 287–298 (1997) MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bovier, A., Zahradnik, M.: The low temperature phase of Kac-Ising models. J. Stat. Phys. 87, 311–332 (1997) MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bovier, A., Merola, I., Presutti, E., Zahradnìk, M.: On the Gibbs phase rule in the Pirogov-Sinai regime. J. Stat. Phys. 114, 1235–1267 (2004) MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buttà, P., Merola, I., Presutti, E.: On the validity of the van der Waals theory in Ising systems with long range interactions. Markov Process. Relat. Fields 3, 63–88 (1977) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cassandro, M., Presutti, E.: Phase transitions in Ising systems with long but finite range interactions. Markov Process. Relat. Fields 2, 241–262 (1996) MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Masi, A., Merola, I., Presutti, E., Vignaud, Y.: Coexistence of ordered and disordered phases in Potts models in the continuum (2008, in preparation) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dobrushin, R.L., Shlosman, S.B.: Completely analytical interactions: constructive description. J. Stat. Phys. 46(5–6), 983–1014 (1987) MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Georgii, H.-O., Häggström, O.: Phase transition in continuum Potts models. Commun. Math. Phys. 181, 507–528 (1996) MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Georgii, H.-O., Miracle-Sole, S., Ruiz, J., Zagrebnov, V.: Mean field theory of the Potts Gas. J. Phys. A 39, 9045–9053 (2006) MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gobron, T., Merola, I.: First order phase transitions in Potts models with finite range interactions. J. Stat. Phys. 126, 507–583 (2006) CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lebowitz, J.L., Mazel, A., Presutti, E.: Liquid vapour phase transitions for systems with finite range interactions. J. Stat. Phys. 94, 955–1025 (1999) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Presutti, E.: Scaling limits in statistical mechanics and microstructures in continuum mechanics. In: Theoretical and Mathematical Physics. Springer, Berlin (2008, to appear) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ruelle, D.: Widom-Rowlinson: Existence of a phase transition in a continuous classical system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 1040–1041 (1971) CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    van der Berg, J.: A uniqueness condition for Gibbs measures with application to the two dimensional antiferromagnet. Commun. Math. Phys. 152, 161–166 (1993) MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    van der Berg, J., Maes, C.: Disagreement percolation in the study of Markov fields. Ann. Probab. 22, 749–763 (1994) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    van der Berg, J., Steif, J.E.: Percolation and the hard core lattice model. Stoch. Process. Appl. 49, 179–197 (1994) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zahradnìk, M.: A short course on the Pirogov-Sinai theory. Rend. Mat. Appl. 18, 411–486 (1998) MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna De Masi
    • 1
  • Immacolata Merola
    • 1
  • Errico Presutti
    • 2
  • Yvon Vignaud
    • 3
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Matematica Pura ed ApplicataUniversità di L’AquilaL’AquilaItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di MatematicaUniversità di Roma Tor VergataRomeItaly
  3. 3.Institut für Mathematik, Fakultät IITU BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations