Advertisement

Journal of Statistical Physics

, Volume 127, Issue 1, pp 51–106 | Cite as

Thermodynamic Formalism for Systems with Markov Dynamics

  • V. Lecomte
  • C. Appert-Rolland
  • F. van Wijland
Article

Abstract

The thermodynamic formalism allows one to access the chaotic properties of equilibrium and out-of-equilibrium systems, by deriving those from a dynamical partition function. The definition that has been given for this partition function within the framework of discrete time Markov chains was not suitable for continuous time Markov dynamics. Here we propose another interpretation of the definition that allows us to apply the thermodynamic formalism to continuous time.

We also generalize the formalism—a dynamical Gibbs ensemble construction—to a whole family of observables and their associated large deviation functions. This allows us to make the connection between the thermodynamic formalism and the observable involved in the much-studied fluctuation theorem.

We illustrate our approach on various physical systems: random walks, exclusion processes, an Ising model and the contact process. In the latter cases, we identify a signature of the occurrence of dynamical phase transitions. We show that this signature can already be unraveled using the simplest dynamical ensemble one could define, based on the number of configuration changes a system has undergone over an asymptotically large time window.

Keywords

thermodynamic formalism dynamical phase transition Ruelle’s pressure fluctuation theorem chaos continuous time Markov dynamics Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy dynamical partition function Simple Exclusion Process Contact Process 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    1. D. Ruelle, Thermodynamic Formalism (Addison-Wesley, Reading (Mass.), 1978).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    2. Ya. G. Sinai, Gibbs measures in ergodic theory, Russian Math. Surv. 27:21 (1972); D. Ruelle, A measure associated with axiom-A attractors, Am. J. Math. 98:619 (1976); R. Bowen and D. Ruelle, The ergodic theory of axiom-A flows, Inven. Math. 29:181 (1975).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    3. G. Gallavotti and E. G. D. Cohen, Dynamical ensembles in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74:2694 (1995) [chao-dyn/9410007].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    4. D. J. Evans and D. J. Searles, Equilibrium microstates which generate second law violating steady states, Phys. Rev. E 50:1645 (1994).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    5. C. Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78:2690 (1997) [cond-mat/9610209].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    6. C. Bustamante, J. Liphardt and F. Ritort, The non-equilibrium thermodynamics of small systems, Phys Today 58:43 (2005); F. Ritort, Work fluctuations, transient violations of the second law and free-energy recovery methods: Perspectives in Theory and Experiments, in Poincaré Seminar, Vol. 2, pp. 195–229 (Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2003) [cond-mat/0401311]; G. M. Wang, E. M. Sevick, E. Mittag, D. J. Searles, and D. J. Evans, Experimental demonstration of violations of the second law of thermodynamics for small systems and short time scales, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89:050601 (2002); G. M. Wang, J. C. Reid, D. M. Carberry, D. R. M. Williams, E. M. Sevick, and D. J. Evans, Experimental study of the fluctuation theorem in a nonequilibrium steady state, Phys. Rev. E 71:046142 (2005); G. M. Wang, D. M. Carberry, J. C. Reid, E. M. Sevick and D. J. Evans, Demonstration of the steady-state fluctuation theorem from a single trajectory, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17:S3239 (2005); K. Feitosa and N. Menon, Fluidized granular medium as an instance of the fluctuation theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92:164301 (2004); S. Ciliberto, N. Garnier, J. F. Pinton and R. Ruiz-Chavarria, Experimental test of the Gallavotti-Cohen fluctuation theorem in turbulent flows, Physica A 340:240 (2004); S. Ciliberto and C. Laroche, An experimental test of the Gallavotti-Cohen fluctuation theorem, J. Physique IV 8:Pr6–215 (1998); N. Garnier and S. Ciliberto, Nonequilibrium fluctuations in a resistor, Phys. Rev. E 71:060101 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    7. J. Kurchan, Fluctuation theorem for stochastic dynamics, J. Phys. A 31:3719 (1998) [cond-mat/9709304].zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    8. J. L. Lebowitz and H. Spohn, A Gallavotti-Cohen type symmetry in the large deviation functional for stochastic dynamics, J. Stat. Phys. 95:333 (1999) [cond-mat/9811220].zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    9. G. E. Crooks, Nonequilibrium measurements of free energy differences for microscopically reversible markovian systems, J. Stat. Phys. 90:1481 (1998); Entropy production fluctuation theorem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy differences, Phys. Rev. E 60:2721 (1999) [cond-mat/9901352].zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    10. C. Giardinà, J. Kurchan and L. Peliti, Direct evaluation of large-deviation functions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96:120603 (2006).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    11. B. Derrida and J. L. Lebowitz, Exact large deviation function in the asymmetric exclusion process, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80:209 (1998) [cond-mat/9809044].zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    12. B. Derrida and C. Appert, Universal large deviation function of the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation in one dimension, J. Stat. Phys. 94:1–30 (1999).zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    13. T. Bodineau and B. Derrida, Current fluctuations in nonequilibrium diffusive systems: an additivity principle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92:180601 (2004) [cond-mat/0402305].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    14. V. Lecomte, Z. Rácz and F. van Wijland, Energy flux distribution in a two-temperature Ising model, J. Stat. Mech. P02008 (2005) [cond-mat/0412547].Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    15. J. Farago, Injected Power Fluctuations in Langevin Equation, J. Stat. Phys. 107:781 (2002) [cond-mat/0106191].zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    16. F. van Wijland and Z. Rácz, Large deviations in weakly interacting driven lattice gases, J. Stat. Phys. 118:27 (2005) [cond-mat/0404358].zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    17. V. Lecomte, C. Appert-Rolland and F. van Wijland, Chaotic properties of systems with Markov dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95:010601 (2005) [cond-mat/0505483].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    18. P. Gaspard, Chaos, Scattering and Statistical Mechanics, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series vol. 9 (Cambridge UP, 1998).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    19. J. R. Dorfman, An Introduction to Chaos in Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    20. J. R. Dorfman, M. H. Ernst and D. Jacobs, Dynamical chaos in the Lorentz lattice gas, J. Stat. Phys. 81:497 (1995).zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    21. C. Appert, H. van Beijeren, M. H. Ernst and J. R. Dorfman, Thermodynamic formalism in the thermodynamic limit: Diffusive systems with static disorder, Phys. Rev. E 54:R1013 (1996) [chao-dyn/9607019]; C. Appert, H. van Beijeren, M. H. Ernst and J. R. Dorfman, Thermodynamic formalism and localization in Lorentz gases and hopping models, J. Stat. Phys. 87:1253 (1997).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    22. P. Gaspard, Time-reversed dynamical entropy and irreversibility in Markovian random processes, J. Stat. Phys. 117:599, (2004).zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    23. C. Beck and F. Schlögl, Thermodynamics of Chaotic Systems: An Introduction, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series vol. 4 (Cambridge UP, 1993).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    24. N. van Kampen, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry (North-Holland, 1992).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    25. H. van Beijeren and J. R. Dorfman, Lyapunov exponents and Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy for the Lorentz gas at low densities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74:4412 (1995).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    26. H. van Beijeren, J. R. Dorfman, H. A. Posch and Ch. Dellago, Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy for dilute gases in equilibrium, Phys. Rev. E 56:5272 (1997) [chao-dyn/9706019].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    27. M. Dzugutov, E. Aurell, and A. Vulpiani, Universal relation between the Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy and the thermodynamical entropy in simple liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81:1762 (1998); E. G. D. Cohen L. Rondoni, Comment on universal relation between the Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy and the thermodynamical entropy in simple liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84:394 (2000); A. Samanta, Sk. M. Ali and S. K. Ghosh, New universal scaling laws of diffusion and Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy in simple liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92:145901 (2004); D. Ihm, Y.-H Shin, J.-W. Lee and E. K. Lee, Correlation between Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy and self-diffusion coefficient in simple fluids, Phys. Rev. E 67:027205 (2003).zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    28. Z. Rácz, Scaling functions for nonequilibrium fluctuations: A picture gallery, SPIE Proceedings 5112:248 (2003) [cond-mat/0307490].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    29. B. Derrida, B, Douçot and P.-E. Roche, Current fluctuations in the one dimensional symmetric exclusion process with open boundaries, J. Stat. Phys. 115:713 (2004) [cond-mat/0310453].Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    30. H. van Beijeren and J. R. Dorfman, A note on the Ruelle pressure for a dilute disordered Sinai billiard, J. Stat. Phys. 108:767 (2002) [nlin.CD/0112031].zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    31. P. Gaspard and X.-J. Wang, Noise, chaos, and (ɛ,τ)-entropy per unit time, Phys. Rep. 235:291 (1993).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    32. P. Gaspard, Entropy production in open volume-preserving systems, J. Stat. Phys. 88:1215 (1997).zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    33. A. Latz, H. van Beijeren and J. R. Dorfman, Lyapunov spectrum and the conjugate pairing rule for a thermostatted random Lorentz gas: kinetic theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78:207 (1997).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    34. P. Grassberger, private discussion.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    35. D. J. Evans, E. G. D. Cohen, and G. P. Morriss, Probability of second law violations in shearing steady states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71:2401 (1993).zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    36. D. J. Evans and D. J. Searles, The fluctuation theorem, Adv. Phys. 51:1529 (2002).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    37. C. Maes, The fluctuation theorem as a Gibbs property, J. Stat. Phys. 95:367 (1999) [math-ph/9812015].zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    38. L. Bertini, A. De Sole, D. Gabrielli, G. Jona-Lasinio, and C. Landim, Macroscopic current fluctuations in stochastic lattice gases [cond-mat/0407161].Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    39. L. Bertini, A. De Sole, D. Gabrielli, G. Jona-Lasinio and C. Landim, Non equilibrium current fluctuations in stochastic lattice gases, [cond-mat/0506664].Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    40. L. Bertini, A. De Sole, D. Gabrielli, G. Jona-Lasinio and C. Landim, Large deviations of the empirical current in interacting particle systems, [math.PR/0512394].Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    41. M. H. Ernst and J. R. Dorfman, Chaos in Lorentz Lattice gases, in J. J. Brey, J. Marro, J. M. Rubi and M. San Miguel (Eds.), 25 Years of Non-Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics, pp. 199–210, (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1995).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    42. P. Gaspard and G. Nicolis, Transport properties, Lyapunov exponents, and entropy per unit time, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65:1693 (1990).zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    43. B. Derrida, An exactly soluble non-equilibrium system: the asymmetric simple exclusion process, Phys. Rep. 301:65 (1998).CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    44. D. Kim, Bethe ansatz solution for crossover scaling functions of the asymmetric XXZ chain and the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang-type growth model, Phys. Rev. E 52:3512 (1995).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    45. Th. W. Ruijgrok and J. A. Tjon, Critical slowing down and nonlinear response in an exactly solvable stochastic model, Physica 65:539 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    46. R. Dickman and R. Vidigal, Quasi-stationary distributions for stochastic processes with an absorbing state, J. Phys. A 35:1147 (2002).zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    47. C. Deroulers and R. Monasson, Field theoretic approach to metastability in the contact process, Phys. Rev. E 69:016126 (2004) [cond-mat/0309637].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    48. H. Hinrichsen, Nonequilibrium critical phenomena and phase transitions into absorbing states, Adv. Phys. 49:815 (2000) [cond-mat/0001070].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    49. R. H. Schonmann, Critical points of two-dimensional bootstrap percolation-like cellular automata, J. Stat. Phys. 58:1239 (1990).CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    50. J. Reiter, F. Mauch and J. Jäckle, Blocking transitions in lattice spin models with directed kinetic constraints, Physica A 184:493 (1992).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    51. C. Toninelli, G. Biroli and D. S. Fisher, Jamming percolation and glass transitions in lattice models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96:035702 (2006) [cond-mat/0509661].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    52. Julien Tailleur, private discussion.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    53. R. Graham, Lyapunov exponents and supersymmetry of stochastic dynamical systems, Europhys. Lett. 5:101 (1988).ADSGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    54. E. Gozzi and M. Reuter, Chaos, Lyapunov exponents, path-integrals and forms, Solitons & fractals 4:1117 (1994)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    55. S. Tănase-Nicola and J. Kurchan, Statistical-mechanical formulation of Lyapunov exponents, J. Phys. A 36:10299–10324 (2003) [cond-mat/0210380].CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    56. M. Merolle, J. P. Garrahan and D. Chandler, Space-time thermodynampics of the glass transition, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sc. 102:10837 (2005).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    57. R. L. Jack, J. P. Garrahan and D. Chandler, [cond-mat/0604068], Space-time thermodynamics and subsystem observables in a kinetically constrained model of glassy systems.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    58. V. Lecomte, C. Appert-Rolland and F. van Wijland, Thermodynamic formalism and large deviation functions in continuous time Markov dynamics, Proceedings of the Work, Dissipation and Fluctuations in Nonequilibrium Phyics (Brussels, 2006), submitted to C. R. Physique (Paris). Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Lecomte
    • 1
    • 2
  • C. Appert-Rolland
    • 1
    • 3
  • F. van Wijland
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Physique Théorique (CNRS UMR 8627)Université Paris-SudOrsay cedexFrance
  2. 2.Laboratoire Matière et Systèmes Complexes (CNRS UMR 7057)Université Paris VIIParis cedex 13France
  3. 3.Laboratoire de Physique Statistique (CNRS UMR 8550)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations