Advertisement

Journal of Statistical Physics

, Volume 121, Issue 5–6, pp 901–936 | Cite as

Flocks and Formations

  • J. J. P. Veerman
  • G. Lafferriere
  • J. S. Caughman
  • A. Williams
Article

Abstract

Given a large number (the “flock”) of moving physical objects, we investigate physically reasonable mechanisms of influencing their orbits in such a way that they move along a prescribed course and in a prescribed and fixed configuration (or “in formation”). Each agent is programmed to see the position and velocity of a certain number of others. This flow of information from one agent to another defines a fixed directed (loopless) graph in which the agents are represented by the vertices. This graph is called the communication graph. To be able to fly in formation, an agent tries to match the mean position and velocity of his neighbors (his direct antecedents on the communication graph) to his own. This operation defines a (directed) Laplacian on the communication graph. A linear feedback is used to ensure stability of the coherent flight patterns. We analyze in detail how the connectedness of the communication graph affects the coherence of the stable flight patterns and give a characterization of these stable flight patterns. We do the same if in addition the flight of the flock is guided by one or more leaders. Finally we use this theory to develop some applications. Examples of these are: flight guided by external controls, flocks of flocks, and some results about flocks whose formation is always oriented along the line of flight (such as geese).

Keywords

Communication graphs directed graph laplacians stability of formations linear feedback and control systems of ordinary differential equations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold V.I. Ordinary Differential Equations (MIT Press, 1973)Google Scholar
  2. R. Brualdi and H. Ryser, Combinatorial Matrix Theory, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications (Cambridge University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
  3. J. Caughman and J. J. P. Veerman, Kernels of Directed Graph Laplacians (Portland State University, 2005, submitted for Publication). Note added in Proof: A different formulation of these results has very recently appeared in: R. Agaev, P Cheobotarev, On the spectrum of NonSymmetric Laplacian Matrices, Lin. Alg. & Appl. 399: 157–168 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. J. A. Fax, Optimal and Cooperative Control of Vehicle Formations, Ph. D. Thesis, (California Institute of Technology, 2001)Google Scholar
  5. Fax, J.A., Murray, R.M. 2003Information flow and cooperative control of vehicle formationsIEEE Trans. Automatic Control4914651476MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. B. Francis, personal communicationGoogle Scholar
  7. C. Godsil and G. Royle, Algebraic Graph Theory (Springer, 2001)Google Scholar
  8. D. Guedes de Figueiredo, Análise de Fourier e Equações Diferenciais Parciais, IMPA-CNPQ (Rio de Janeiro, 1977)Google Scholar
  9. M. W. Hirsch and S. Smale, Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems, Linear Algebra (Academic Press, 1974)Google Scholar
  10. Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., Morse, A.S. 2003Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rulesIEEE Trans. Automatic Control489981001CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. G. Lafferriere, J. Caughman and A. Williams, Graph theoretic methods in the stability of vehicle formations, Proc. 2004 Am Control Conf. 3724–3729 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. Lafferriere, G., Williams, A., Caughman, J., Veerman, J.J.P. 2005Decentralized control of vehicle formationsSystem & Control Lett.54899910MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. Lawton, J., Beard, R., Young, B. 2003A decentralized approach to formation maneuversIEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation19933941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. J. Milnor, Dynamics: Introductory Lecture Notes (Stony Brook Preprint, 2001)Google Scholar
  15. Moreau L. Leaderless coordination via bidirectional and unidirectional time- dependent communication. Proc. IEEE Conf Decision and Control 3070–3075 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. Okubo, A. 1986Dynamical aspects of animal grouping: swarms, schools, flocks, and herdsAdv. Biophys.22194Google Scholar
  17. Olfati-Saber R., Murray R. Agreement problems in networks with directed graphs and switching topology. Proc IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 4126–4132 (2003)Google Scholar
  18. R. Olfati-Saber and R. Murray, Consensus protocols for networks of dynamic agents in Proc. IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 4126–4132 (2003)Google Scholar
  19. J. K. Parrish, personal communicationGoogle Scholar
  20. Parrish, J.K., Viscido, S.V., Grünbaum, D. 2002Self-organized fish schools: an examination of emergent propertiesBiol. Bull.202296305Google Scholar
  21. Ren W., Beard R. (2004). Consensus of information under dynamically changing interaction topologies. Proc. Am. Control Conf. 4939–4944Google Scholar
  22. Ren, W., Beard, R. 2004A decentralized scheme for spacecraft formation flying via the virtual structure approach, AIAA J. of GuidanceControl and Dynamics277382Google Scholar
  23. W. Ren and R. Beard, Consensus seeking of multi-agent systems under dynamically changing interaction topologies, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, To AppearGoogle Scholar
  24. C. Reynolds, Flocks, herds, and schools: distributed behavioral model in computer graphics, SIGGRAPH Conf. Proc. 21(4):25–34 (1987). In addition his website http://www.red3d.com/cwr/boids contains a lot of information and linksGoogle Scholar
  25. A.G. Sparks, Special issue on control of satellite formations, Intl J. of Robust and Nonlinear Control 12(2–3) (2002)Google Scholar
  26. Vicsek, T., Czirók, A., Ben-Jacob, E., Cohen, I., Shochet, O. 1995Novel Type of Phase transition in a System of Self-Driven ParticlesPhys. Rev. Lett.7512261229CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. Williams A., Glavăski S., Samad T. (2004). Formations of formations: hierarchy and stability, Proc. Am. Control Conf. 2992–2997Google Scholar
  28. A. Williams, G. Lafferriere and J. J. P. Veerman, Stable Motions of Vehicle Formations, (Portland State University, 2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. J. P. Veerman
    • 1
  • G. Lafferriere
    • 1
  • J. S. Caughman
    • 1
  • A. Williams
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsPortland State UniversityPortland

Personalised recommendations