Finding an optimal Nash equilibrium to the multi-agent project scheduling problem
Large projects often involve a set of contractors, each in charge of a part of the project. In this paper, we assume that every contractor is self-interested and can control the duration of his/her activities, which can be shortened up to an incompressible limit, by gathering extra resources at a given cost. In this context, the resulting project makespan depends on all the contractors’ decisions. The customer of the project is interested in a short project makespan and offers a reward, proportional to the project makespan reduction, to be shared by the contractors. In practice, either the reward sharing policy results from an upfront agreement or payments are freely allocated by the customer. Each contractor is only interested in the maximization of his/her profit and behaves accordingly. This paper addresses the problem of finding a Nash equilibrium and a sharing policy that minimize the project makespan. The aim is to help the customer to determine the duration of the activities and the reward sharing policy such that no agent has an incentive to unilaterally deviate from this solution. We show that this problem is NP-hard and how it can be modeled and solved by mixed integer linear programming. Computational analysis on large instances proves the effectiveness of our approach. Based on an empirical investigation of the influence of reward sharing policies on the project makespan, the paper provides new insight into how a project’s customer should offer rewards to the contractors.
KeywordsProject scheduling Time-cost trade-off Nash equilibrium Mixed integer programming
- Bahrami, F., & Moslehi, G. (2012). Study of payment scheduling problem to achieve client–contractor agreement. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. doi:10.1007/s00170-012-4023-5.
- Bey, R. B., Doersch, R. H., & Patterson, J. H. (1981). The net present value criterion: Its impact on project scheduling. Project Management Quarterly, 12, 35–45.Google Scholar
- Briand, C., Agnetis, A., & Billaut, J. C. (2012). The multiagent project scheduling problem: complexity of finding an optimal Nash equilibrium. In 13th international conference on project management and scheduling, pp. 106–109Google Scholar
- Demeulemeester, E. L., & Herroelen, W. S. (2002). Project scheduling: A research handbook. Kluwer Academic Publishers, chap 2-1.3.4. Transforming an AoN network into an AoA network with minimal reduction complexity, pp. 44–48Google Scholar
- Diaby, M., Cruz, J. M., & Nsakanda, A. L. (2011). Project crashing in the presence of general non-linear activity time reduction costs. International Journal of Operational Research, 12, 318–332.Google Scholar
- Hougaard, J. L. (1990). An introduction to allocation rules. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Schrijver, A. (2004). Combinatorial optimization—Polyhedra and efficiency. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar