Journal of Scheduling

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 471–486 | Cite as

A two-stage coupled algorithm for an integrated maintenance planning and flowshop scheduling problem with deteriorating machines

Article

Abstract

We address a novel integrated maintenance and production scheduling problem in a multi-machine and multi-period production system, considering maintenance as a long-term decision. Deterioration of machines over time decreases production capacity. Since maintenance activities not only improve machine conditions, increasing production capacity, but also take time that cannot be used for production, the challenge is to assign maintenance to periods and to schedule maintenance and production activities within each period to minimize the combined cost of maintenance and lost production over the planning horizon. Motivated by logic-based Benders decomposition, we design an integrated two-stage algorithm to solve the problem. The first stage assigns maintenance to machines and time periods, abstracting the scheduling problem, while the second stage creates a schedule for the current time period. The first stage is then re-solved using feedback from the schedule. This iteration between maintenance planning and scheduling continues until the solution costs in two stages converge. The integrated approach models the interdependencies between maintenance and scheduling decisions in highly coupled processes such as wafer fabrication in the semiconductor manufacturing. Our results demonstrate that the benefit of integrated decision making increases when maintenance is less expensive relative to lost production cost and that a longer horizon for maintenance planning is beneficial when maintenance cost increases.

Keywords

Integrated decision making Maintenance planning Production scheduling Machine deterioration Logic-based Benders decomposition 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank reviewers for their comments, which helped improve the paper. This research was supported by the Discovery Grants Program of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the consortium members of Centre for Maintenance Optimization & Reliability Engineering (C-MORE), the Canadian Foundation for Innovation, the Ontario Research Fund, the Ontario Ministry for Research and Innovation, Microway Inc., IBM ILOG, the University of Toronto Doctoral Completion Award, and the Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering at the University of Toronto.

References

  1. Aggoune, R. (2004). Minimizing the makespan for the flow shop scheduling problem with availability constraints. European Journal of Operational Research, 153, 534–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghezzaf, E., & Najid, N. M. (2008). Integrated production planning and preventive maintenance in deteriorating production systems. Information Sciences, 178, 3382–3392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akturk, M. S., Ghosh, J. B., & Gunes, E. D. (2004). Scheduling with tool changes to minimize total completion time: Basic results and SPT performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 157, 784–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allaoui, H., & Artiba, A. (2004). Integrating simulation and optimization to schedule a hybrid flow shop with maintenance constraints. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 47, 431–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allaoui, H., & Artiba, A. (2006). Scheduling two-stage hybrid flow shop with availability constraints. Computers and Operations Research, 33, 1399–1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aramon Bajestani, M., Banjevic, D., & Beck, J. C. (2014). Integrated maintenance planning and production scheduling with Markovian deteriorating machine conditions. International Journal of Production Research, 52, 7377–7400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aramon Bajestani, M., & Beck, J. C. (2012). Minimizing the number of late jobs in a flow shop with processing times dependent on maintenance. In Technical Report MIE-OR-TR2012-03, Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  8. Aramon Bajestani, M., & Beck, J. C. (2013). Scheduling a dynamic aircraft repair shop with limited repair resources. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 47, 35–70.Google Scholar
  9. Beck, J. C. (2010). Checking-up on branch-and-check. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP2010) (pp. 84–98).Google Scholar
  10. Beck, J. C., & Wilson, N. (2007). Proactive algorithms for job shop scheduling with probabilistic durations. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 28, 183–232.Google Scholar
  11. Benders, J. (1962). Partitioning procedures for solving mixed-variables programming problems. Numerische Mathematik, 4, 238–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blau, J. (2003). News analysis: Europe’s semiconductor makers are back in the game. IEEE Specrnim Magazine, 18–19.Google Scholar
  13. Budai, G., Huisman, D., & Dekker, R. (2006). Scheduling preventive railway maintenance activities. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57, 1035–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cai, X., Sun, A., & Zhou, X. (2003). Stochastic scheduling with preemptive-repeat machine breakdowns to minimize the expected weighted flow time. Probability in the Engineering and Information Sciences, 17, 467–485.Google Scholar
  15. Cai, X., Sun, X., & Zhou, X. (2004). Stochastic scheduling subject to machine breakdowns: The preemptive-repeat model with discounted reward and other criteria. Naval Research Logistics, 51, 800–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cai, X., & Vairaktarakis, G. L. (2012). Coordination of outsourced operations at a third-party facility subject to booking, overtime, and tardiness costs. Operations Research, 60, 1436–1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cassady, C. R., & Kutanoglu, E. (2003). Minimizing job tardiness using integrated preventive maintenance planning and production scheduling. IIE Transactions, 35, 503–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cassady, C. R., & Kutanoglu, E. (2005). Integrating preventive maintenance planning and production scheduling for a single machine. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 54, 304–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen, J. S. (2006). Single-machine scheduling with flexible and periodic maintenance. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57, 703–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cho, I. D., & Parlar, M. (1991). A survey of maintenance models for multi-unit systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 51, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dekker, R., Wildeman, R. E., & van der Duyn Schouten, F. A. (1997). A review of multi-component maintenance models with economic dependence. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 45, 411–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dekker, R., Wildeman, R. E., & van Egmond, R. (1996). Joint replacement in an operational planning phase. European Journal of Operational Research, 91, 74–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fazel-Zarandi, M. M., & Beck, J. C. (2011). Using logic-based Benders decomposition to solve the capacity- and distance-constrained plant location problem. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 24, 399–415.Google Scholar
  24. Geoffrion, A. M., & Graves, G. W. (1974). Multicommodity distribution system design by Benders decomposition. Management Science, 20, 822–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grigoriev, A., van de Klundert, J., & Spieksma, F. C. R. (2006). Modeling and solving the periodic maintenance problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 172, 783–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gupta, J. N. D., & Stafford, E. F, Jr. (2006). Flowshop scheduling research after five decades. European Journal of Operational Research, 169, 699–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hadidi, L. A., Al-Turki, U. M., & Rahim, M. A. (2011). An integrated cost model for production scheduling and perfect maintenance. International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, 3, 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hadidi, L. A., Al-Turki, U. M., & Rahim, M. A. (2012a). Integrated models in production planning and scheduling, maintenance and quality: A review. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 10, 21–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hadidi, L. A., Al-Turki, U. M., & Rahim, M. A. (2012b). Joint job scheduling and preventive maintenance on a single machine. International Journal of Operational Research, 13, 174–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hooker, J. (2005). A hybrid method for planning and scheduling. Constraints, 10, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hooker, J. (2007). Planning and scheduling by logic-based Benders decomposition. Operations Research, 55, 588–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hooker, J., & Ottosson, G. (2003). Logic-based Benders decomposition. Mathematical Programming, 96, 33–60.Google Scholar
  33. Hooker, J., & Yan, H. (1995). Logic circuit verification by Benders decomposition. In V. Saraswat & P. Van Hentenryck (Eds.), Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming: The Newport Papers, Chap. 15 (pp. 267–288). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Ji, M., He, Y., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2007). Single machine scheduling with periodic maintenance to minimize makespan. Computers and Operations Research, 34, 1764–1770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kellerer, H., Rustogi, K., & Strusevich, A. (2013). Approximation schemes for scheduling on a single machine subject to cumulative deterioration and maintenance. Journal of Scheduling, 16, 675–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kim, B. S., & Ozturkoglu, Y. (2013). Scheduling a single machine with multiple preventive maintenance activities and position based deteriorations using genetic algorithms. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 67, 1127–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kovacs, A., & Beck, J. C. (2007). Single-machine scheduling with tool changes: A constraint-based approach. In Proceedings of the 26th Workshop of the UK Planning and Scheduling Special Interest Group (pp. 71–78).Google Scholar
  38. Kumar, S., & Kumar, P. R. (2001). Queueing network models in the design and analysis of semiconductor wafer fabs. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 17, 548–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kuo, W. H., & Yang, D. L. (2008). Minimizing the makespan in a single-machine scheduling problem with the cyclic process of an aging effect. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59, 416–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kuo, Y., & Chang, Z. (2007). Integrated production scheduling and preventive maintenance planning for a single machine under a cumulative damage failure process. Naval Research Logistics, 54, 602–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee, C. Y. (1996). Machine scheduling with an availability constraint. Journal of Global Optimization, 9, 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lee, C. Y. (1999). Two-machine flow shop scheduling with availability constraints. European Journal of Operational Research, 114, 420–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lee, C.-Y. (2004). Handbook of scheduling: Algorithms, models and performance analysis. Machine scheduling with availability constraints. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
  44. Lee, C. Y., & Leon, V. J. (2001). Machine scheduling with a rate-modifying activity. European Journal of Operational Research, 128, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lenstra, J. K., Rinnooy Kan, A. H. G., & Brucker, P. (1977). Complexity of machine scheduling problems. Annals of Discrete Mathematics, 1, 342–362.Google Scholar
  46. Liao, C. J., & Chen, W. J. (2003). Single-machine scheduling with periodic maintenance and non-resumable jobs. Computers and Operations Research, 30, 1335–1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lodree, E. J, Jr, & Geiger, C. D. (2010). A note on the optimal sequence position for a rate-modifying activity under simple linear deterioration. European Journal of Operational Research, 201, 644–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ma, Y., & Chu, C. (2010). A survey of scheduling with deterministic machine availability constraints. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 58, 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McCall, J. J. (1965). Maintenance policies for stochastically failing equipment. Management Science, 11, 493–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mönch, L., Fowler, J. W., Dauzére-Pèrés, S., Mason, S. J., & Rose, O. (2011). A survey of problems, solution techniques, and future challenges in scheduling semiconductor manufacturing operations. Journal of Scheduling, 14, 583–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mosheiov, G., & Sarig, A. (2009). Scheduling a maintenance activity and due-window assignment on a single machine. Computers and Operations Research, 36, 2541–2545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mosheiov, G., & Sidney, J. B. (2010). Scheduling a deteriorating maintenance activity on a single machine. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61, 882–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Naderi, B., Zandieh, M., & Fatemi Ghomi, S. M. T. (2009). A study on integrating sequence dependent setup time flexible flow lines and preventive maintenance scheduling. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 20, 683–694.Google Scholar
  54. Nicolai, R. P., & Dekker, R. (2008). Optimal maintenance of multi-component systems: A review. Complex system maintenance handbook. Berlin: Springer Series in Reliability Engineering.Google Scholar
  55. Pinedo, M. (2002). Scheduling, theory, algorithms, and systems (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  56. Pintelon, L., & Parodi-Herz, A. (2008). Maintenance: An evolutionary perspective. Complex system maintenance handbook. Berlin: Springer Series in Reliability Engineering.Google Scholar
  57. Ramíez-Hernández, J. A., & Fernández-Gaucherand, E. (2003). An algorithm to convert wafer to calendar-based preventive maintenance schedules for semiconductor manufacturing systems. In Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (pp. 5926–5931).Google Scholar
  58. Ruiz, R., García-Díaz, J. C., & Maroto, C. (2007). Considering scheduling and preventive maintenance in the flowshop sequencing problem. Computers and Operations Research, 34, 3314–3330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rustogi, K., & Strusevich, A. (2012). Single machine scheduling with general positional deterioration and rate-modifying maintenance. Omega, 40, 791–804.Google Scholar
  60. Schmidt, G. (2000). Scheduling with limited machine availability. European Journal of Operational Research, 121, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shabtay, D. (2012). The just-in-time scheduling problem in a flowshop scheduling system. European Journal of Operational Research, 216, 521–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sloan, T. W. (2004). A periodic review production and maintenance model with random demand, deteriorating equipment, and binomial yield. Journal of Operational Research Society, 55, 647–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sloan, T. W. (2008). Simultaneous determination of production and maintenance schedules using in-line equipment condition and yield information. Naval Research Logistics, 55, 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Uzsoy, R., Lee, C. Y., & Martin-Vega, L. A. (1992). A review of production planning and scheduling models in semiconductor industry, Part I: System characteristics, performance evaluation and production planning. IIE Transactions, 24, 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wang, H. (2002). A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 139, 469–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Xu, D., Yin, Y., & Li, H. (2010). Scheduling jobs under increasing linear machine maintenance time. Journal of Scheduling, 13, 443–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yang, S. J., & Yang, D. L. (2010). Minimizing the makespan on single-machine scheduling with aging effects and variable maintenance activities. Omega, 38, 528–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yao, X., Fernández-Gaucherand, E., Fu, M. C., & Marcus, S. I. (2004). Optimal preventive maintenance scheduling in semiconductor manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 17, 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yu, X., Zhang, Y., & Steiner, G. (2014). Single-machine scheduling with periodic maintenance to minimize makespan revisited. Journal of Scheduling, 17, 263–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maliheh Aramon Bajestani
    • 1
  • J. Christopher Beck
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical & Industrial EngineeringUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations