Empowerment scheduling for a field workforce
- First Online:
- 377 Downloads
Employee empowerment is a flexible management concept. As in traditional scheduling, the employer is still in charge of assigning jobs to staff. However, employees are allowed to express their preferences for the jobs they want to do. The hope is that empowerment will improve morale, which will improve productivity. The challenge is to design such an empowerment scheduling system without undesirable outcomes.
In the proposed model, employees submit their preferences as “work plans”. The organizational goal and the employees’ work plans may not be in conflict. In such situations, win-win schedules can be generated without costing the organization. When there is a conflict, the organization is willing to give up a certain amount of its optimality (which is determined by the organization) in order to consider the employee’s work plans. The employer is in charge, and therefore jobs undesirable to any of the employees will still be done. A main consideration in empowerment is to make the employees feel that the system is fair. The proposed model maintains fairness by incorporating an automatic market-like mechanism that controls the violation cost of each employee’s request.
The model is applied to solve a workforce scheduling problem which involves scheduling a multi-skilled workforce to geographically dispersed tasks. Extensive computational experiments are conducted, which show that this model enables an organization to implement employee empowerment effectively.
KeywordsFlexible workforce scheduling Skill-based routing Metaheuristics
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Alsheddy, A., & Tsang, E. P. K. (2010). Guided Pareto local search based frameworks for biobjective optimization. In The congress on evolutionary computation (CEC), Spain, Barcelona. New York: IEEE Press. Google Scholar
- Baker, S. (1993). Applying simulated annealing to the workforce management problem (Technical report). British Telecom Laboratories. Google Scholar
- Borenstein, Y., Shah, N., Tsang, E. P. K., Dorne, R., Alsheddy, A., & Voudouris, C. (2008). On the partitioning of dynamic scheduling problems—assigning technicians to areas. In Genetic and evolutionary computation conference 2008, USA. Google Scholar
- Burke, E. K., De Causmaecker, P., Petrovic, S., & Vanden Berghe, G. (2001). Fitness evaluation for nurse scheduling problems. In The congress on evolutionary computation (CEC2001) (pp. 1139–1146). New York: IEEE Press. Google Scholar
- Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: integrating theory and practice. The Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471–482. Google Scholar
- Dimitriades, Z. S. (2001). Empowerment in total quality: Designing and implementing effective employee decision-making strategies. Quality Management Journal, 8(2), 19–28. Google Scholar
- Glover, F., & Kochenberger, G. (2003). International series in operations research & management science. Handbook of metaheuristics. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
- Hambleton, R. S. (1982). The prospect award 1981: a manpower planning model for mobile repairmen. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 33(7), 621–627. Google Scholar
- Hung, R. (2002). A note on nurse self-scheduling. Nursing Economics, 20(1), 37–39. Google Scholar
- Lever, J., Wallace, M., & Richards, B. (1995). Constraint logic programming for scheduling and planning. British Telecom Technology Journal, 13(1), 73–80. Google Scholar
- Miller, M. L. (1984). Implementing self-scheduling. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 14(3), 33–36. Google Scholar
- Muller, C., Magill, E., & Smith, D. (1993). Distributed genetic algorithms for resource allocation (Technical report). Strathclyde University. Google Scholar
- Tsang, E. P. K. (1993). Foundations of constraint satisfaction. San Diego: Academic Press. Google Scholar
- Tsang, E. P. K., Gosling, T., Virginas, B., Voudouris, C., & Owusu, G. (2005). Retractable contract network for distributed scheduling. In 2nd multidisciplinary international conference on scheduling: theory & applications (MISTA) (pp. 485–500), New York. Google Scholar
- Tsang, E. P. K., Gosling, T., Virginas, B., Voudouris, C., Owusu, G., & Liu, W. (2008a). Retractable contract network for empowerment in workforce scheduling. Multiagent and Grid Systems, 4(1), 25–44. Google Scholar
- Ursu, M., Virginas, B., Owusu, G., & Voudouris, C. (2005). Distributed resource allocation via local choices: A case study of workforce allocation. International Journal of Knowledge Based Intelligent Systems Engineering, 9(4), 293–301. Google Scholar
- Voudouris, C., & Tsang, E. P. K. (2003). Guided local search. In F. Glover (Ed.), Handbook of metaheuristics (pp. 185–218). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. Google Scholar
- Voudouris, C., Owusu, G., Dorne, R., & Lesaint, D. (2008). Service chain management: technology innovation for the service business. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
- Yang, R. (1996). Solving a workforce management problem with constraint programming. In The 2nd international conference on the practical application of constraint technology (pp. 373–387). Google Scholar