Advertisement

Journal of Seismology

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 1439–1466 | Cite as

Seismicityof the Novaya Zemlya archipelago: relocated event catalog from 1974 to 2014

  • Alexey N. Morozov
  • Vladimir E. Asming
  • Natalya V. Vaganova
  • Yana V. Konechnaya
  • Yana A. Mikhaylova
  • Zinaida A. Evtyugina
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

We have relocated seismic events registered in the area of the Novaya Zemlya Archipelago, which are not identified as nuclear explosions but are probably of tectonic nature. For the relocation, we collected all available seismic bulletins and waveform data. The location was performed by applying a modified method of generalized beamforming. Verification of the modified method and selection of the travel time model were performed using data on two Novaya Zemlya nuclear explosions that occurred on 02.11.1974 and 24.10.1990. The modified method and the BARENTS travel time model provide sufficient accuracy for event location in the region. The relocation procedure was applied for 9 seismic events registered in the area of the Novaya Zemlya Archipelago. As a result, the new coordinates of the five events turned out to be significantly different from those that were defined previously.

Keywords

Novaya Zemlya archipelago Earthquakes catalog Relocation procedures 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the employees of the Archive of the Geophysical Survey of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Thanks are extended to the head of the department of seismology at the Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research Galina Antonovskaya for supporting the scientific research.

Funding research to relocated seismic events was provided by the Council of the Russian Federation President Grant MK-7387.2016.5. Funding research to verification of the algorithm, selection of travel time model, and location error estimation was provided by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant No. 16-35-00020).

References

  1. Asming, V.&Prokudina, A. (2016) System for automatic detection and location of seismic events for arbitrary seismic station configuration NSDL. ESC 2016-373, 35th general assembly of the European seismological commissionGoogle Scholar
  2. Asming, V.E., Fedorov, A.V., Vinogradov, A.N., Vinogradov, Yu.A., Goryunov, V.A., Evtyugina, Z.A. (2016) Automatic system for seismic monitoring of Northwest Russia and the western sector of the Arctic. Proceedings of the XI International Seismological Workshop. Kyrgyzstan 34–37 [in Russian]Google Scholar
  3. Assinovskaya BA (1994) Seismicity of the Barents Sea. RAS, Moscow, p 128 [in Russian]Google Scholar
  4. Atlas: geology and mineral resources of the shelf of Russia (2004) Scientific world, Moscow, pp 108Google Scholar
  5. Avetisov G (1996) Seismically active zones of the Arctic. VNIIOkeangeologia, St. Petersburg, p 186 http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/avetisov/avetisov.htm Google Scholar
  6. Gibbons SJ, Antonovskaya G, Asming V, Konechnaya YV, Kremenetskaya E, Kværna T, Schweitzer J, Vaganova NV (2016) The 11 October 2010 Novaya Zemlya earthquake: Implications for velocity models and regional event location. Bull SeismolSoc Am 106(4)Google Scholar
  7. International Seismological Centre (2013) Reference Event Bulletin, http://www.isc.ac.uk, Internatl. Seismol.Cent., Thatcham, United Kingdom
  8. Kennett BLN, Engdahl ER (1991) Traveltimes for global earthquake location and phase identification. Geophys J Int 105(2):429–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Khalturin VI, Rautian TG, Richards PG, Leith WS (2005) A review of nuclear testing by the soviet Union at Novaya Zemlya, 1955–1990. Sci Glob Secur 13(1–2):1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kremenetskaya E, Asming V, Ringdal F (2001) Seismic location calibration of the European Arctic. Pure Appl Geophys 158(1):117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kvaerna T, Ringdal F (1996) Generalized beamforming, phase association and threshold monitoring using a global seismic network. In monitoring a comprehensive testban treaty. Springer, Netherlands, pp 447–466Google Scholar
  12. Marshall PD, Stewart RC, Lilwall RC (1989) The seismic disturbance on 1986 august 1 near Novaya Zemlya: A source of concern? Geophys J Int 98(3):565–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Morozov AN, Vaganova NV (2017) Thetravel times of regional P and S for spreading ridges in the European Arctic. J VolcanolSeismol 11(2):156–163Google Scholar
  14. Morozov A, Konechnaya Y (2013) Monitoring of the Arctic region: Contribution of the Arkhangelsk seismic network. J Seismol 17(2):819–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morozov AN, Vaganova NV (2011) The travel-time of seismic waves for the north of the Russian plate according to the data from the Arkhangelsk seismic network. Prospect Protect Mineral Resour 12:48–51 [in Russian]Google Scholar
  16. Ringdal F (1997) Study of low-magnitude seismic events near the Novaya Zemlya nuclear testsite. Bull SeismolSoc Am 87(6):1563–1575Google Scholar
  17. Schweitzer J, Kennett BL (2007) Comparison of location procedures: The Kara Sea event of 16 august 1997. Bull SeismolSoc Am 97(2):389–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yang, X., Bondár, I., and Romney, C. (2000) PIDC ground truth event (GT) database (revision 1). Center for Monitoring ResearchGoogle Scholar
  19. Yang X, North R, Romney C, Richards PG (2003) Worldwide nuclear explosions. Int Geophys 81:1595–1599CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexey N. Morozov
    • 1
    • 2
  • Vladimir E. Asming
    • 3
  • Natalya V. Vaganova
    • 1
  • Yana V. Konechnaya
    • 2
  • Yana A. Mikhaylova
    • 1
  • Zinaida A. Evtyugina
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SeismologyFederal Center for Integrated Arctic ResearchArkhangelskRussia
  2. 2.Seсtor of seismic monitoring of the north of the Russian plateGeophysical Survey of Russian Academy of SciencesArkhangelskRussia
  3. 3.Kola Branch of Geophysical Survey of Russian Academy of SciencesApatityRussia

Personalised recommendations