Advertisement

Journal of Seismology

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 1295–1322 | Cite as

A first-order seismotectonic regionalization of Mexico for seismic hazard and risk estimation

  • F. Ramón Zúñiga
  • Gerardo Suárez
  • Ángel Figueroa-Soto
  • Avith Mendoza
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to define a seismic regionalization of Mexico for seismic hazard and risk analyses. This seismic regionalization is based on seismic, geologic, and tectonic characteristics. To this end, a seismic catalog was compiled using the more reliable sources available. The catalog was made homogeneous in magnitude in order to avoid the differences in the way this parameter is reported by various agencies. Instead of using a linear regression to converts from m b and M d to M s or M w , using only events for which estimates of both magnitudes are available (i.e., paired data), we used the frequency-magnitude relations relying on the a and b values of the Gutenberg-Richter relation. The seismic regions are divided into three main categories: seismicity associated with the subduction process along the Pacific coast of Mexico, in-slab events within the down-going COC and RIV plates, and crustal seismicity associated to various geologic and tectonic regions. In total, 18 seismic regions were identified and delimited. For each, the a and b values of the Gutenberg-Richter relation were determined using a maximum likelihood estimation. The a and b parameters were repeatedly estimated as a function of time for each region, in order to confirm their reliability and stability. The recurrence times predicted by the resulting Gutenberg-Richter relations obtained are compared with the observed recurrence times of the larger events in each region of both historical and instrumental earthquakes.

Keywords

Seismic hazard Seismic risk Seismic regionalization Seismicity Mexico Tectonics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Servicio Sismológico Nacional (SSN) for providing the data from the seismic catalog. One of us (GS) thanks grant number 082821 of the Mexican Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT). Partial support (F.R.Z.) by grant UNAM-PAPIIT 108115 is also gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Abe K (1981) Magnitudes of large shallow earthquakes from 1904 to 1980. Phys of the Earth and Planet Int 27:79–92Google Scholar
  2. Abhijit G, Sen MK (2008) A possible mechanism for the spatial distribution of seismicity in northern Gulf of Mexico. Geophys J Int 175:1141–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aki K (1965) Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula log N = a - b M and its confidence limits. Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo 43:237–239Google Scholar
  4. Anderson JG, Bodin P, Brune JN, Prince J, Singh SK, Quaas R, Onate M (1986) Strong ground motion from the Michoacan, Mexico, earthquake. Science 233:1043–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson JG, Singh SK, Esphndola JM, Yamamoto J (1989) Seismic strain release in the Mexican subduction thrust. Physics Earth Planet Int 58:307–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Astiz LM (1980) Sismicidad en Acambay, Estado de México. El temblor del 22 de febrero de 1979. Professional Thesis, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Ingeniería, Mexico CityGoogle Scholar
  7. Avila-Barrientos L, Zúñiga FR, Rodríguez Q, Guzmán-Speziale M (2015) Variation of b and p values from aftershocks sequences along the Mexican subduction zone and their relation to plate characteristics. J S Am Earth Sci 63:162–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bakun WH (2006) Modified Mercalli intensity attenuation and historical earthquakes in the Basin and Range Province of western North America. Bull Seism Soc Am 96:2206–2220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bath M and S Duda (1979) Some aspects of global seismicity. Report No. 1–79, Seismological Institute, Uppsala, Sweden, 41pGoogle Scholar
  10. Bender B (1983) Maximum likelihood estimation of b values for magnitude grouped data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73:831–851Google Scholar
  11. Bevington PR, Robinson DK (2002) Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
  12. Bravo H, Rebollar C, Uribe A, Jiménez O (2004) Geometry and state of stress of the Wadatti-Benioff zone in the Gulf of Tehuantepec. J Geophys Res 109. doi: 10.1029/2003JB002854
  13. Castro R (1983) Source parameters and propagation-path effects for earthquakes in the Baja California Norte and Imperial Valley regions, M.S. Thesis, University of California-San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  14. Chávez M, Castro R (1988) Attenuation of modified Mercalli intensity with distance in Mexico. Bull Seismol Soc Am 78:1875–1884Google Scholar
  15. Clemente-Chavez A, Figueroa-Soto A, Zúñiga FR, Arroyo M, Montiel M, Chavez O (2013) Seismicity at the northeast edge of the Mexican Volcanic Belt (MVB), activation of an undocumented fault: the Peñamiller earthquake sequence of 2011, Queretaro, Mexico. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:2521–2531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Counil JL, Achache J (1987) Magnetization gaps associated with tearing in the Central America subduction. Geophys Res Letters 14:1115–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DeMets C, Stein S (1990) Present day kinematics of the RIV plate and implications for tectonics of southwestern Mexico. J Geophys Res 95:21931–21948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dewey JW, Suárez G (1991) Seismotectonics of Middle America. In: Slemmons DB, Engdahl ER, Zoback MD, Blackwell DD (eds) Neotectonics of North America: Decade Map Volume 1. Geological Society of America, Boulder, pp 309–321Google Scholar
  19. Doser DI (1987) The 16 August 1931 Valentine, Texas, earthquake: evidence for normal faulting in west Texas. Bull Seismol Soc Am 77:2005–2017Google Scholar
  20. Doser D (1992) Faulting processes of the 1956 San Miguel, Baja California, earthquake sequence. Pure Appl Geophys 139:3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Doser DI, Rodriguez J (1993) The seismicity of Chihuahua, Mexico and the 1928 Parral earthquake. Phys Earth Planet Inter 78:97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duda SJ (1965) Secular seismic energy release in the circum-Pacific belt. Tectonophysics 2:409–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dumas DB (1980) Seismicity in the Basin and Range Province of Texas and northeastern Chihuahua, Mexico, New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, 31st Field Conference, Trans-Pecos RegionGoogle Scholar
  24. Dumas DB, Dorman HJ, Latham GV (1980) A reevaluation of the August 16, 1931 Texas earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 70:1171–1180Google Scholar
  25. Eissler HK, McNally K (1984) Seismicity and tectonics of the Rivera plate and implications for the 1932 Jalisco, Mexico, earthquake. J Geopys Res 89:4520–4530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Figueroa J (1970) Catálogo de Sismos ocurridos en la República Mexicana. Instituto de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Reporte Interno, 272, 88 ppGoogle Scholar
  27. Frohlich C (1982) Seismicity of the central Gulf of Mexico. Geology 10:103–106. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. García-Acosta V, Suárez G (1996) Los sismos en la historia de México. México, CIESAS/UNAM/Fondo de Cultura Económica 776 ppGoogle Scholar
  29. Gasperini P, Lolli B (2015) Comparative analysis of regression methods used for seismic magnitude conversions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 105:1787–1791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1956) Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy, and acceleration (second paper). Bull Seismol Soc Am 46:105–145Google Scholar
  31. Habermann RE (1987) Man-made changes in seismicity rates. Bull Seismol Soc Am 77:141–159Google Scholar
  32. Hauksson E, Stock J, Hutton K, Yang W, Vidal-Villegas JA, Kanamori H (2011) The 2010 Mw 7.2 el mayor-Cucapah earthquake sequence, Baja California, Mexico and southernmost California, USA: active seismotectonics along the Mexican Pacific margin. Pure Appl Geophys 168:1255–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Henry CD, Aranda-Gomez JJ (1992) The real southern Basin and Range: mid- to late Cenozoic extension in Mexico. Geology 20:701–704. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jaramillo SH, Suárez G (2011) The 4 December 1948 earthquake (Mw 6.4): evidence of reverse faulting beneath the Tres Marías escarpment and its implications for the Rivera-North America relative plate motion. Geofis Int 50:313–3172Google Scholar
  35. Kanamori H (1977) The energy release in great earthquakes. J Geophys Res 82:1981–1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kanamori H, Abe K (1979) Reevaluation of the turn-of-the-century seismicity peak. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 84(Issue B11):6131–6139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kelleher J, Sykes L, Oliver J (1973) Possible criteria for predicting earthquake locations and their application to major plate boundaries of the Pacific and Caribbean. J Geophys Res 78:2547–2585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kijko A (2011) Introduction to probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. In: Gupta H (ed) Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  39. Kostoglodov V, Bandy W (1995) Seismotectonic constraints on the rate between the Rivera and North American plates. J Geophys Res 100:17977–11989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Krystek M, Anton M (2007) A weighted total least-squares algorithm for fitting a straight line. Measurement Science Technology 18:3438–3442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Langridge RM, Weldon RJ II, Moya JC, Suárez G (2000) Paleoseismology of the 1912 Acambay earthquake and the Acambay-Tixmadejé Fault, Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. J Geophys Res 105:3019–3037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Langridge RM, Persaud M, Zúñiga FR, Aguirre-Díaz G, Villamor P, Lacan P (2013) The Pastores Fault: preliminary paleoseismic results and its role in the Acambay graben, Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt, Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas 30(3):463–481Google Scholar
  43. Michael A (2014) How complete is the ISC-GEM global earthquake catalog? Bull Seismol Soc Am 104:1829–1837. doi: 10.1785/0120130227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Miyamura S (1976) Provisional magnitudes of Middle American earthquakes not listed in the magnitude catalogue of Gutenberg-Richter. Bull Earthquake Res Inst Univ Tokyo 14:41–46Google Scholar
  45. Natali SG, Sbar ML (1982) Seismicity in the epicentral region of the 1887 northeastern Sonoran earthquake, Mexico. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72:181–196Google Scholar
  46. Nettles M (2006) Two unusual seismic events in the Gulf of Mexico in 2006, in Proceedings of Incorporated Research Institutions in Seismology (IRIS) Annual Workshop (Abstracts)Google Scholar
  47. Nettles M (2007) Analysis of the 10 February 2006: Gulf of Mexico Earthquake from Global and Regional Seismic Data, in Proceedings of Annual Conference, Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TexasGoogle Scholar
  48. Nishenko SP, Singh SK (1987) Conditional probabilities for the recurrence of large and great interplate earthquakes along the Mexican subduction zone; 1986-2006. Bull Seismol Soc Am 77:2094–2114Google Scholar
  49. Ortuño M, Zúñiga FR, Aguirre-Díaz GJ, Carreón-Freyre D, Cerca M, Roverato M (2015) Holocene paleo-earthquakes recorded at the transfer zone of two major faults: the Pastores and Venta de Bravo faults (Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt). Geosphere 11:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pacheco JF, Singh SK (2010) Seismicity and state of stress in Guerrero segment of the Mexican subduction zone. J Geophys Res 115:B01303. doi: 10.1029/2009JB006453 Google Scholar
  51. Pacheco JF, Skyes LN, Scholz CH (1993) Nature of seismic coupling along simple plate boundaries of subduction type. J Geophys Res 98:14,133–14,159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pardo M, Suárez G (1993) Steep subduction geometry of the Rivera plate beneath the Jalisco block in western Mexico. Geophys Res Lett 20:2391–2394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pardo M, Suárez G (1995) Shape of the subducted Rivera and Cocos plates in southern Mexico: seismic and tectonic implications. J Geophys Res 100(12):357Google Scholar
  54. Pérez-Campos X, Kim Y, Husker A, Davis PM, Clayton RW, Iglesias A, Gurnis M (2008) Horizontal subduction and truncation of the Cocos plate beneath central Mexico. Geophys Res Lett 35:L18303. doi: 10.1029/2008GL035127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ponce L, Gaulon R, Suárez G, Lomas E (1992) Geometry and the state of stress of the downgoing Cocos plate in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, Mexico. Geophys Res Lett 19:773–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pujol J (2016) Regression between earthquake magnitudes having errors with known variances. J Seismol 20:1041–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ranjit D, Wason HR, Sharma ML (2012) Magnitude conversion to unified moment magnitude using orthogonal regression relation. J Asian Earth Sci 50:44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Reyes A, Brune JN, Lomnitz C (1979) Source mechanism and aftershock study of the Colima, Mexico, earthquake of January 10, 1973. Bull Seismol Soc Am 69:1819–1840Google Scholar
  59. Ryan WBF, Carbotte SM, Coplan JO, O'Hara S, Melkonian A, Arko R, Weissel RA, Ferrini V, Goodwillie A, Nitsche F, Bonczkowski J, and Zemsky R (2009) Global Multi-Resolution Topography synthesis, Geochem Geophys Geosyst. doi: 10.1029/2008GC002332
  60. Scholz CH, Campos J (2012) The seismic coupling of subduction zones revisited. J Geophys Res 117:B05310. doi: 10.1029/2011JB009003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Singh SK, Mortera F (1991) Source time functions of large Mexican subduction earthquakes, morphology of the Benioff zone, age of the plate, and their tectonic implications. J Geophys Res 96(B13):21487–21502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Singh SK and G Suárez (1987) Overview of the seismicity of México with emphasis on the September 1985 Michoacan earthquake. In Cassaro MA and Martínez-Romero E (eds.) The Mexico Earthquakes-1985: Factors Involved and Lessons Learned, Proceedings of the International Conference of American Civil Engineering Society. American Association of Civil Engineers, Washington, 7–18Google Scholar
  63. Singh SK, Suárez G (1988) Regional variation in the number of aftershocks (m b ≧ 5) of large, subduction-zone earthquakes (M w ≧ 7.0). Bull Seismol Soc Am 78:230–242Google Scholar
  64. Singh SK, Astiz L, Havskov J (1981) Seismic gaps and recurrence periods of large earthquakes along the Mexican subduction zone: a reexamination. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71:827–843Google Scholar
  65. Singh SK, Rodríguez M, Esteva L (1983) Statistics of small earthquakes and frequency of occurrence of large earthquakes along the Mexican subduction zone. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73:1779–1796Google Scholar
  66. Singh SK, Rodriguez M, Espindola JM (1984) A catalog of shallow earthquakes of Mexico from 1900 to 1981. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74:267–279Google Scholar
  67. Singh SK, Suárez G, Domínguez T (1985a) The Oaxaca, Mexico, earthquake of 1931: lithospheric normal faulting in the subducting Cocos plate. Nature 317:56–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Singh SK, Ponce L, Nishenko SP (1985b) The great Jalisco, Mexico, earthquakes of 1932: subduction of the Rivera plate. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75:1301–1313Google Scholar
  69. Singh SK, Ordaz M, Pérez-Rocha LE (1996) The great Mexican earthquake of 19 June 1858: expected ground motions and damage in Mexico City from a similar future event. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:1655–1666Google Scholar
  70. Suárez G (2000) Reverse faulting in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec: Backarc deformation induced by the subduction of the Tehuantepec ridge. Special Papers, Geological Society of America 334:263–268Google Scholar
  71. Suárez G, Albini P (2009) Evidence for great tsunamigenic earthquakes (M8.6) along the Mexican subduction zone. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:892–896. doi: 10.1785/0120080201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Suárez G and Caballero-Jiménez GV (2012) Quantitative evaluation of historical earthquakes on the Mexican volcanic belt. In Pérez-López R, Silva PG, Rodríguez-Pascua MA, Garduño-Monroy VH, Suárez G, Reicherter K (eds.) Earthquake geology and archaeology: science, society, and seismic hazard: Proceedings of the 3 rd INQUA−IGCP-567 International Workshop on Active Tectonics, Paleoseismology, and Archaeoseismology, 183–185.Google Scholar
  73. Suárez G, López A (2015) Seismicity in the southwestern Gulf of Mexico: evidence of active back arc deformation. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas 32:77–83Google Scholar
  74. Suárez G, Monfret T, Wittlinger G, David C (1990) Geometry of subduction and depth of the seismogenic zone in the Guerrero gap, Mexico. Nature 345:336–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Suárez G, García-Acosta V, Gaulon R (1994) Active crustal deformation in the Jalisco block, Mexico: evidence for a great historical earthquake in the 16th century. Tectonophysics 234:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Suárez G, Jaramillo SH, Bandy WL (2013) Relative motion between the Rivera and north American plates determined from the slip direction of earthquakes. Pure Appl Geophys 170:2163–2172. doi: 10.1007/s00024-013-0667-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Suárez G, Sánchez-Alvaro E, Lomas-Delgado E, Arvizu-Lara G (2016) The 2013 seismic swarm in Chihuahua, Mexico: evidence of active extensional deformation in the Southern Basin and range. Bull Seismol Soc Am. doi: 10.1785/0120160179
  78. Suter M (1987) Orientational data on the state of stress in northeastern Mexico as inferred from stress-induced borehole elongations. J Geophys Res 92:2617–2626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Suter M (1992) Active faults and state of stress in the central part of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt, Mexico, 1. The Venta de Bravo Fault. J. of Geophys. Res. 97:11,983–11,993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Suter M (1995) The Acambay graben: active interarc extension in the trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. Tectonics 14:1245–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Suter M (2001) The historical seismicity of northeastern Sonora and northwestern Chihuahua, Mexico (28-32 N, 106-111 W). J S Am, Earth Sciences 14:521–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Suter M (2006) Contemporary studies of the 3 May 1887 Mw 7.5 Sonora, Mexico (Basin and Range Province) earthquake. Seism Res Lett 77:134–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Thatcher W (1972) Regional variations of seismic source parameters in the northern Baja California area. J Geophys Res 77(Issue8):1549–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. UNAM Seismology Group (1986) The September 1985 Michoacan earthquakes: aftershock distribution and history of rupture. Geophys Res Lett 13:573–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. UNAM Seismology Group (2015) Papanoa, Mexico earthquake, of 18 April 2014 (Mw 7.2). Geofis Int 54(4):289–298Google Scholar
  86. Utsu T (1999) Representation and analysis of the earthquake size distribution: a historical review and some new approaches. In Seismicity Patterns, their Statistical Significance and Physical Meaning, Birkhäuser, Basel 509–535Google Scholar
  87. Valdés CM, Meyer RP, Zúñiga R, Singh SK, Havskov J (1982) Analysis of the Petatlan aftershocks: numbers, energy release and asperities. J Geophys Res 87:8519–8529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Woessner J, Wiemer S (2005) Assessing the quality of earthquake catalogues: estimating the magnitude of completeness and its uncertainty. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:684–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wyss M, Habermann RE (1982) Conversion of mb to Ms for estimating the recurrence time of large earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72(5):1651–1662Google Scholar
  90. Zúñiga FR (1989) A study of the homogeneity of the NOAA earthquake data file in the mid-America region by the magnitude signature technique. Geofis Int 28:103–119Google Scholar
  91. Zúñiga FR, Figueroa-Soto A (2012) Converting magnitudes based on the temporal stability of a and b values in the Gutenberg Richter law. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102:2116–2127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Zúñiga FR, Wyss M (1995) Inadvertent changes in magnitude reported in earthquake catalogs: influence on b-value estimates. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85:1858–1866Google Scholar
  93. Zúñiga FR, Valdés-González CM, Reyes MA (2000) A general overview of the catalog of recent seismicity compiled by the Mexican Seismological Survey. Geofis Int 39:161–170Google Scholar
  94. Zúñiga FR, Reyners M, Villamor P (2005) Temporal variations of the earthquake data in the catalogue of seismicity of New Zealand. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 38:87–107Google Scholar
  95. Zúñiga FR, Ortuño MA, and Figueroa-Soto A (2012) Incorporation of paleoseismological data in the calculation of the seismic hazard: An Example in Central Mexico, Proceedings of the 3rd INQUA-IGCP 567 International Workshop on Earthquake Geology, Palaeoseismology and Archaeoseismology, Morelia MéxicoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro de GeocienciasUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoJuriquillaMexico
  2. 2.Instituto de GeofísicaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMexico CityMexico
  3. 3.Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de HidalgoMoreliaMexico
  4. 4.Posgrado en Ciencias de la TierraUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations