Journal of Seismology

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 721–739 | Cite as

Modeling earthquake dynamics

Original Article

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate questions arising in Parsons and Geist (Bull Seismol Soc Am 102:1–11, 2012). Pseudo causal models connecting magnitudes and waiting times are considered, through generalized regression. We do use conditional model (magnitude given previous waiting time, and conversely) as an extension to joint distribution model described in Nikoloulopoulos and Karlis (Environmetrics 19: 251–269, 2008). On the one hand, we fit a Pareto distribution for earthquake magnitudes, where the tail index is a function of waiting time following previous earthquake; on the other hand, waiting times are modeled using a Gamma or a Weibull distribution, where parameters are functions of the magnitude of the previous earthquake. We use those two models, alternatively, to generate the dynamics of earthquake occurrence, and to estimate the probability of occurrence of several earthquakes within a year or a decade.

Keywords

Duration Earthquakes Generalized linear models Seismic gap hypothesis 

References

  1. Aki K (1956) Some problems in statistical seismology. J Seismol Soc Jpn 8:205–227Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson P, Jiskoot J, Massari R, Murray T (1998) Generalized linear modelling in geomorphology. Earth Surf Process Landf 23(13):1185–1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bak P, Tang C (1989) Earthquakes as a self-organized critical phenomenon. J Geophys Res 94 (15):635–637Google Scholar
  4. Bak P, Christensen K, Danon L, Scanlon T (2002) Unified scaling law for earthquakes. Phys Rev Lett 88:178501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakun WH, Lindh AG (1985) The Parkfield, California, earthquake prediction experiment. Science 229:619–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benioff H (1951) Earthquakes and rock creep. Bull Seismol Soc Am 41(1):31–62Google Scholar
  7. Bell AF, Naylor M, Heap MJ, Main IG (2011) Forecasting volcanic eruptions and other material failure phenomena: an evaluation of the failure forecast method. Geophys Res Lett 38:L15304Google Scholar
  8. Bufe CG, Perkins DM (2005) Evidence for a global seismic-moment release sequence. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:833–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carbone V, Sorriso-Valvo L, Harabaglia P, Guerra I (2005) Unified scaling law for waiting times between seismic events. Europhys Lett 71(6):1036–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christensen K, Danon L, Scanlon T, Bak P (2002) Unified scaling law for earthquakes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:2509–2513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Corral A (2003) Local distributions and rate fluctuations in a unified scaling law for earthquakes. Phys Rev E 68:035102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corral A (2004) Long-term clustering, scaling, and universality in the temporal occurrence of earthquakes. Phys Rev Lett 92Google Scholar
  13. Corral A (2006) Dependence of earthquake recurrence times and independence of magnitudes on seismicity history. Tectonophysics 424:177–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corral A (2007) Statistical features of earthquake temporal occurrence. Lect Notes Phys 705:191–221Google Scholar
  15. Corral A, Christensen K (2006) Comment on earthquakes descaled: on waiting time distributions and scaling laws. Phys Rev Lett 96:109801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davidsen J, Goltz C (2005) Are seismic waiting time distributions universal? Geophys Res Lett 31:L21612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davis PM, Jackson DD, Kagan YY (1989) The longer it has been since the last earthquake, the longer the expected time till the next? Bull Seismol Soc Am 79:1439–1456Google Scholar
  18. Davis SD, Frohlich C (1991) Single-link cluster analysis of earthquake aftershocks—decay laws and regional variations. J Geophys Res 96:6335–6350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Enescu B, Struzik Z, Kiyono K (2008) On the recurrence time of earthquakes: insight from Vrancea (Romania) intermediate-depth events. Geophys J Int 172(1):395–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gardner JK, Knopoff L (1974) Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed Poissonian? Bull Seismol Soc Am 64:1363–1367Google Scholar
  21. Gilbert GK (1909) Earthquake forecasts. Science 29:121–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Godano C, Pingue F (2000) Is the seismic moment-frequency relation universal? Geophys J Int 142:193–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1941) Seismicity of the earth. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 34:1–131Google Scholar
  24. Hagiwara Y (1974) Probability of earthquake occurrence as obtained from a Weibull distribution analysis of crustal strain. Tectonophysics 23:323–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hainzl S, Scherbaum F, Beauval C (2006) Estimating background activity based on interevent-time distribution. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:313–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hainzl S, Marsan D (2008) Dependence of the Omori-Utsu law parameters on main shock magnitude: observations and modeling. J Geophys Res 113Google Scholar
  27. Hasumi T, Akimoto T, Aizawa Y (2009a) The Weibull–Log Weibull distribution for interoccurrence times of earthquakes. Phys A 388:491–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hasumi T, Akimoto T, Aizawa Y (2009b) The Weibull–Log Weibull transition of the interoccurrence time statistics in the two-dimensional Burridge-Knopoff earthquake model. Phys A 388:483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hasumi C, Chen T, Akimoto, Aizawa Y (2010) The Weibull-log Weibull transition of interoccurrence time for synthetic and natural earthquakes. Tectonophysics 485:9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hill BM (1975) A simple general approach to inference about the tail of a distribution. Ann. Stat. 3:1163–1174Google Scholar
  31. Holschneider M, Zöller G, Hainzl S (2011) Estimation of the maximum possible magnitude in the framework of a doubly truncated Gutenberg-Richter model. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(4):1649–1659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huc M, Main IG (2003) Anomalous stress diffusion in earthquake triggering: correlation length, time dependence, and directionality. J Geophys Res 108:2324Google Scholar
  33. Jensen HJ (1998) Self-organized criticallity. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kagan YY (1991) Seismic moment distribution. Geophys J Int 106:123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kagan YY (1993) Statistics of characteristic earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 83:7–24Google Scholar
  36. Kagan YY (2002a) Seismic moment distribution revisited: I. statistical results. Geophys J Int 148(3):520–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kagan YY (2010) Earthquake size distribution: power-law with exponent β = 1/2? Tectonophysics 490:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kagan YY (2011) Random stress and Omori’s law. Geophys J Int 186(3):1347–1364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kagan YY, Jackson DD (1991) Seismic gap hypothesis: ten years after. J Geophys Res 96 (21):419–421Google Scholar
  40. Kagan YY, Jackson DD (1995) New seismic gap hypothesis: five years after. J Geophys Res 100:3943–3959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kagan YY, Knopoff L (1987a) Statistical short-term earthquake prediction. Science 236:1563–1567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kagan YY, Knopoff L (1987b) Random stress and earthquake statistics: time dependence. Geophys J R Astron Soc- A 88:723–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kanamori H (1977) The energy release in great earthquakes. J Geophys Res 82:2981–2987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kerr RA (2004) Parkfield keeps secrets after a long-awaited quake. Science 306:206–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kijko A (2004) Estimation of the maximum earthquake magnitude, m max. Pure Appl Geophys 161:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Knopoff L, Kagan YY (1977) Analysis of the theory of extremes as applied to earthquake problems. J Geophys Res 82:5647–5657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Langenbruch C, Dinske C, Shapiro SA (2011) Inter event times of fluid induced earthquakes suggest their poisson nature. Geophys Res Lett 38Google Scholar
  48. Lennartz S, Livina VN, Bunde A, Havlin S (2008) Long-term memory in earthquakes and the distribution of interoccurrence times. Europhys Lett 81Google Scholar
  49. Leonard T, Papsouliotis O, Main IG (2001) A Poisson model for identifying characteristic size effects in frequency data: application to frequency-size distributions for global earthquakes, “starquakes” and fault lengths. J Geophys Res 106(13):473–484Google Scholar
  50. Lombardi AM, Marzocchi W (2007) Evidence of clustering and nonstationarity in the time distribution of large worldwide earthquakes. J Geophys Res 112Google Scholar
  51. Lomnitz C (1994) Fundamentals of earthquake prediction. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Main I (2000) Apparent breaks in scaling in the earthquake cumulative frequency-magnitude distribution: fact or artifact? Bull Seismol Soc Am 90:86–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Matthews MV, Ellsworth WL, Reasenberg PA (2002) A Brownian model for recurrent earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:2233–2250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McCann WR, Nishenko SP, Sykes IR, Krause J (1979) Seismic gaps and plate tectonics: seismic potential for major boundaries. Pure Appl Geophys 117:1082–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mega MS, Allegrini P, Grigolini P, Latora V, Palatella L, Rapisarda A, Vinciguerra S (2003) Power-law time distribution of large earthquakes. Phys Rev Lett 90(18):188501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Molchan G (2005) Interevent time distribution in seismicity: a theoretical approach. Pure Appl Geophys 162:1135–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Molchan G, Kronrod T (2007) Seismic interevent time: a spatial scaling and multifractality. Pure Appl Geophys 164:75–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Murray J, Segall P (2002) Testing time-predictable earthquake recurrence by direct measurement of strain accumulation and release. Nature 419:287–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Newman W, Turcotte DL, Shcherbakov R, Rundle JB (2005) Why Weibull?. In: Proceedings of the American geophysical union. Fall Meeting 2005, #S43D-07Google Scholar
  60. Nikoloulopoulos AK, Karlis D (2008) Fitting copulas to bivariate earthquake data: the seismic gap hypothesis revisited. Environmetrics 19:251–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nishenko SP, Sykes LR (1993) Comment on ‘Seismic gap hypothesis: ten years after’ by Y.Y. Kagan and D.D. Jackson. J Geophys Res 98:9909–9916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ogata Y (1988a) Statistical models for earthquake occurrence and residual analysis for point processes. J Am Stat Assoc 83:9–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ogata Y (1998b) Space-time point-process models for earthquake occurrences. Ann Inst Stat Math 50(2):379–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ogata Y (1999) Seismicity analysis through point-process modeling: a review. Pure Appl Geophys 155:471–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ogata Y, Katsura K (1993) Analysis of temporal and spatial heterogeneity of magnitude frequency distribution inferred from earthquake catalogues. Geophys J Int 113:727–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Omori F (1894) On aftershocks. J Coll Sci, Imperial University of Tokyo 7:111–200Google Scholar
  67. Pacheco JF, Scholz CH, Sykes LR (1992) Changes in frequency-size relationship from small to large earthquakes. Nature 355:71–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pareto V (1896) Cours d’économie politique, tome 2. F. Rouge, LausanneGoogle Scholar
  69. Parsons T (2002) Global Omori law decay of triggered earthquakes: large aftershocks outside the classical aftershock zone. J Geophys Res 107:2199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Parsons T (2008) Earthquake recurrence on the south Hayward fault is most consistent with a time dependent, renewal process. Geophys Res Lett 35Google Scholar
  71. Parsons T, Geist EL (2012) Were global M≥8.3 earthquake time intervals random between 1900—2011? Bull Seismol Soc Am 102:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ramírez-Rojas A, Flores-Marquez EL, Valverde-Esparza S (2012) Weibull characterization of inter-event lags of earthquakes occurred in the Pacific coast of Mexico. Geophys Res Abstr 14:13708Google Scholar
  73. Reid HF (1910) The mechanics of the earthquake. Vol. 2 of The California Earthquake of April 18, 1906. Report of the State Earthquake Investigation Commission (Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication 87)Google Scholar
  74. Rhoades DA (1996) Estimation of the Gutenberg-Richter relation allowing for individual earthquake magnitude uncertainties. Tectonophysics 258:71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rikitake T (1974) Probability of an earthquake occurrence as estimated from crustal strain. Tectonophysics 23:299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rundle JB, Rundle PB, Shcherbakov R, Turcotte DL (2005) Earthquake waiting times: theory and comparison with results from virtual California simulations. Geophys Res Abstr 7:2477Google Scholar
  77. Savage JC (1994) Empirical earthquake probabilities from observed recurrence intervals. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(1):219–221Google Scholar
  78. Shcherbakov R, Yakovlev G, Turcotte DL, Rundle JB (2005) Model for the distribution of aftershock interoccurrence times. Phys Rev Lett 95:218501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shlien S, Toksöz MN (1970) A clustering model for earthquake occurrences. Bull Seismol Soc Am 60:1765–1787Google Scholar
  80. Sieh K (1996) The repetition of large-earthquake ruptures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:3764–3771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sieh K, Stuiver M, Brillinger D (1989) A more precise chronology of earthquakes produced by the San Andreas fault in Southern California. J Geophys Res 94:603–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stein RS (1995) Characteristic or hazard? Nature 370:443–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stein RS (2002) Parkfield’s unfulfilled promise. Nature 419:257–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Thatcher W (1989) Earthquake recurrence and risk assessment in circum-Pacific seismic gaps. Nature 341:432–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Udías A, Rice J (1975) Statistical analysis of microearthquake activity near San Andreas geophysical observatory, Hollister, California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65:809–828Google Scholar
  86. Utsu T (1984) Estimation of parameters for recurrence models of earthquakes. Bull Earthq Res Inst, Univ Tokyo 59:53–66Google Scholar
  87. Utsu T (1999) Representation and analysis of the earthquake size distribution: a historical review and some new approaches. Pure Appl Geophys 155:509–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Vere-Jones D (1970) Stochastic models for earthquake occurrence (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B 32:1–62Google Scholar
  89. Vere-Jones D (1975) Stochastic models for earthquake sequences. Geophys J R Astron Soc 42:811–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Vere-Jones D (1976) A branching model for crack propagation. Pure Appl Geophys 114:711–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Vere-Jones D (1977) Statistical theories of crack propagation. Math Geol 9:455–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Vere-Jones D, Robinson R, Yang W (2001) Remarks on the accelerated moment release model: problems of model formulation, simulation and estimation. Geophys J Int 144(3):517–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wang JH, Kuo C-H (1998) On the frequency distribution of interoccurrence times of earthquakes. J Seismol 2: 351–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wang Q, Jackson DD, Zhuang J (2010) Missing links in earthquake clustering models. Geophys Res Lett 37Google Scholar
  95. Weldon R, Scharer K, Fumal T, Biasi G (2004) Wrightwood and the earthquake cycle: what a long recurrence record tells us about how faults work. GSA Today 14(9):4–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wyss M (1973) Towards a physical understanding of the earthquake frequency distribution. Geophys J R Astron Soc 31:341–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Zhuang J, Ogata Y, Vere-Jones D (2002) Stochastic declustering of space-time earthquake occurrences. J Am Stat Assoc 97:369–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Zhuang J, Ogata Y, Vere-Jones D (2004) Analyzing earthquake clustering features by using stochastic reconstruction. J Geophys Res 109Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UQAMMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations