Journal of Seismology

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 219–230 | Cite as

New data about seismicity and crustal velocity structure of the “continent-ocean” transition zone of the Barents-Kara region in the Arctic

  • Alexey N. Morozov
  • Natalya V. Vaganova
  • Yana V. Konechnaya
  • Vladimir E. Asming
Original Article

Abstract

The recent (2011) installation of seismic station Zemlya Franca-Iocifa (ZFI) on Alexander Island in the Franz Josef Land Archipelago allows new seismic monitoring of the “continent-ocean” transition zone of the Barents-Kara Sea region. The region is seismically active, and we hypothesize that the prevailing geodynamic factor responsible for the occurrence of weak earthquakes is isostatic compensation of avalanche sedimentation in the “continent-ocean” transition zone. The crustal velocity structure beneath ZFI was determined using receiver functions. Crustal thickness is 30 km, based on an observed Moho discontinuity with underlying mantle velocities being Vp = 8.15 km/s and Vs = 4.5 km/s The model indicates a mid-crustal boundary at a depth of about 17 km with a velocity contrast between the upper (Vp = 6.1 km/s, Vs = 3.6 km/s) and lower (Vp = 6.8 km/s, Vs = 3.9 km/s) layers. In addition, the upper crustal sedimentary layer is about 4 km thick with Vp = 4.3 km/s and Vs = 2.36 km/s.

Keywords

Seismic monitoring of the Arctic Barents-Kara Sea region Continental slope Crustal velocity structure 

References

  1. Avetisov G (1996) Seismically active zones of the Arctic. Saint-Petersburg: VNIIOkeangeologia. 186 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Avetisov G, Bulin N (1974) Deep structure of the Franz-Josef Land on the seismological data. Geophys Methods Explor Arctic 9:26–32Google Scholar
  3. Antonovskaya G, Danilov K, Konechnaya Y, Danilov A (2011) Installation and first results of the seismic station ZFI on the Franz-Joseph Land archipelago. Phys Bull Inst Nat Sci Biomed NARFU 10:31–38Google Scholar
  4. Assinovskaya B (1994) Seismicity of the Barents Sea. Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, p 128Google Scholar
  5. Atlas: geology and mineral resources of the shelf of Russia (2004) Moscow: Scientific world, 108 ppGoogle Scholar
  6. Baturin D (1988) Structure and evolution of the continental margin of the Eurasian basin between Svalbard and Franz-Josef Land archipelagos. Rep Acad Sci USSR 299:412–423Google Scholar
  7. Birch F (1961) The velocity of compressional waves in rocks in 10 kilobars, part 2. J Geophys Res 66(7):2199–2224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dibner V (1978) The morphological structure of the Barents Sea shelf 211Google Scholar
  9. Gabsatarova I (2006) Introduction into routine practice divisions of the Geophysical Survey of RAS calculation procedure of the local magnitude. In: Modern methods of processing and interpretation of seismic data, Geophysical Survey, Saint-Peterburg, 2–6 October, 49–53Google Scholar
  10. GEOFON. GEOFON program. www.geofon.gfz-potsdam.de/geofon
  11. Geophysical Survey of Russian Academy of Science. http://www.ceme.gsras.ru
  12. Haskell NA (1962) Crustal reflection of plane P and SV waves. J Geophys Res 67(12):4751–4767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hjelstuen B, Eldholm O, Faleide J (2007) Recurrent Pleistocene mega-failures on the SW Barents Sea margin. Earth Planet Sci Lett 258(4–3):605–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. International Registry of Seismograph Stations maintained jointly by International Seismological Centre & World Data Center for Seismology. http://www.isc.ac.uk/cgi-bin/stations?listc=Z
  15. Khain V (2001) Tectonics of continents and oceans. Scientific world, Moscow, p 606Google Scholar
  16. Khutorskoi M, Leonov Y, Ermakov A, Ahmedzyanov V (2009) Anomalous heat flow and the nature of troughs in the Northern part of the Svalbard plate. Rep Russian Acad Sci 424(2):227–233Google Scholar
  17. Kosarev GL, Makeyeva LI, Vinnik LP (1987) Inversion of teleseismic P-wave particle motions for crustal structure in Fennoscandia. Phys Earth Planet Inter 47:11–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kremenetskaya E, Asming V (2002) Problems of regional seismic event location and depth estimation in the European Arctic. In: Workshop on IMS Location Calibration and Screening 4, Oslo, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  19. Kremenetskaya E, Asming V, Vinogradov Yu (2004) Seismic profiling and calibration of seismic travel-time models for Barents region. Geophysical Research Abstracts, V.6, 00881, 2004. SRef-ID: 1607-7962/gra/EGU04-A-00881 c European Geosciences Union 2004Google Scholar
  20. Milanovskii E (1996) Geology of Russia and CIS countries (North Eurasia). Moscow State University, Moscow, p 448Google Scholar
  21. Moroz E, Mazarovich A, Abramova A, Efimov V, Zaraiskaya Y, Sokolov S (2010) Neotectonics of the North-West of the Barents Sea. Geol Geoecol Cont Margins Eurasia 2:161–173Google Scholar
  22. Morozov A, Konechnaya Y (2013) Monitoring of the Arctic region: contribution of the Arkhangelsk seismic network. J Seismol 17(2):819–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/
  24. Panasenko G (1986) Problems of seismic zoning of the western sector of Soviet Arctic. Nat Econ North 14:4–6Google Scholar
  25. Peterson J (1993) Observations and modeling of seismic background noise. US Geol Surv Open-File Rep 93322:95Google Scholar
  26. Pogrebickii Yu (1984) Transitional zones “continent-ocean” in geodynamic system of the Arctic ocean. Reports of 27th MGK 7: 29–37Google Scholar
  27. Sakoulina T, Telegin A, Tichonova I et al (2000) The results of deep seismic investigations on geotraverse in the Barents Sea from Kola peninsula to Franz-Joseph Land. Tectonophysics 329(1–4):319–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Seismic Handler - seismic waveform analysis tool. http://www.seismic-handler.org
  29. Tikhonov A, Glasko V (1965) Use of the regularization method in non-linear problems. USSR Comput Math Math Phys 5(3):93–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vaganova N, Afonin N (2012) The first results on crustal and upper mantle velocity structure from receiver functions - KLM seismic broadband station in the North of Russian Plate. In: Book of abstracts 33rd General Assembly of the European Seismological Commission (GA ESC 2012), 19 – 24 August 2012, Moscow and Young Seismologist Training Course (YSTC 2012), 25 – 30 August 2012, Obninsk, pp. 74Google Scholar
  31. Vanneste M, Mienert J, Bunz S (2006) The Hinlopen slide: a giant, submarine slope failure on the northern Svalbard margin, Arctic Ocean. Rep Earth Planet Sci Lett 245(1–2):373–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Verba M (2007) Modern bilateral tension of the earth’s crust in the Barents-Kara region and its role in the evaluation of the hydrocarbon potential. Oil and gas Geology. Theory and practice, 2, http://www.ngtp.ru/rub/4/026.pdf
  33. Vinnik L (1977) Detection of waves converted from P to S in the mantle. Phys Earth Planet Inter 15(1):39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vinogradov A, Baranov S (2013) The possible impact of landslide processes on the seismicity of the north-western part of the Barents sea. In: Modern methods of processing and interpretation of seismic data, Geophysical Survey, Gelendzghik, 99–103Google Scholar
  35. Winkelmann D, Stein R (2007) Triggering of the Hinlopen/Yermak Megaslide in relation to paleoceanography and climate history of the continental margin north of Spitsbergen. Reports of Geochem.Geophys. Geosyst. (G3), V. 8, 6, 1–15. (An electronic journal of the earth sciences doi:10.1029/2006GC001485)
  36. Yudahin F, Francuzova V (2006) The need to create a network of seismic monitoring in the northern regions of Russia. Vestnik Ural Branch Russ Acad Sci 2(16):25–35Google Scholar
  37. Zaionchek AV, Brekke H, Sokolov SYU, Mazarovich AO, Dobrolyubova KO, Efimov VN, Abramova AS, Zaraiskaya YUA, Kohan AV, Moroz EA, Peive AA, Chamov NP, Yampolskiy KP (2010) The structure of the transition zone continent-ocean north-western periphery of the Barents Sea (according to 24, 25 and 26 flights vessel “Akademik Nikolai Strakhov,” 2006-2009). The structure and evolution of the lithosphere. Russia’s contribution to the International Polar Year, Moscow, Paulsen, 4:111–157Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexey N. Morozov
    • 1
    • 2
  • Natalya V. Vaganova
    • 1
  • Yana V. Konechnaya
    • 2
  • Vladimir E. Asming
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SeismologyInstitute of Ecological Problems of the North of Ural Branch Russian Academy of SciencesArkhangelskRussia
  2. 2.Seсtor Seismic Monitoring of the North of the Russian Plate, Geophysical Survey of Russian Academy of SciencesArkhangelskRussia
  3. 3.Kola Branch of Geophysical Survey of Russian Academy of SciencesApatityRussia

Personalised recommendations