Prediction of magnitude of the largest potentially induced seismic event
We propose a method for determining the possible magnitude of a potentially largest induced seismic event derived from the Gutenberg–Richter law and an estimate of total released seismic moment. We emphasize that the presented relationship is valid for induced (not triggered) seismicity, as the total seismic moment of triggered seismicity is not bound by the injection. The ratio of the moment released by the largest event and weaker events is determined by the constants a and b of the Gutenberg–Richter law. We show that for a total released seismic moment, it is possible to estimate number of events greater than a given magnitude. We determine the formula for the moment magnitude of a probable largest seismic event with one occurrence within the recurrence interval (given by one volumetric change caused by mining or injecting). Finally, we compare theoretical and measured values of the moment magnitudes of the largest induced seismic events for selected geothermal and hydraulic fracturing projects.
KeywordsMagnitude Seismic moment b value Induced events Microseismicity Hydraulic fracturing Enhanced geothermal systems
We are grateful to the Oil-Subcommittee of the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) and its operating companies (OpCos) for sponsoring the pilot project “Microseismic Feasibility Study”. This study was supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic P210/12/2451. We would like to also thank anonymous reviewers for very valuable advices.
- Aki K (1981) A probabilistic synthesis of precursors phenomena. Earthquake prediction. Maurice Ewing series, 4 ed. Simson and Richards, AGU: Washington D.C., pp 566–575.Google Scholar
- Aki K, Richards PG (1980) Quantitative seismology theory and methods. W.H. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- Anderson JG, Luco JE (1983) Consequences of slip rate constraints on earthquake occurrence relation. Bull Seism Soc Am 73:471–496Google Scholar
- Baisch S, Carbon D, Dannwolf U, Delacou B, Devaux M, Dunand F, Jung R, Koller M, Martin C, Sartori M, Secanell R, Vörös R (2009a) Deep heat mining Basel—seismic risk analysis. SERIANEX study prepared for the Departement für Wirtschaft, Soziales und Umwelt des Kantons Basel-Stadt, Amt für Umwelt und Energie. http://www.wsu.bs.ch/geothermie.
- Blewitt G, Coolbaugh M, Holt W, Kreemer C, Davis JL, Bennettal RA (2002) Targeting of potential geothermal resources in the Great Basin from regional relationships between geodetic strain and geological structures. Transactions Geothermal Resources Council 26:523–526Google Scholar
- ECOS (2002) Swiss Seismological Service, Earthquake Hazard and Risk, Earthquake Catalog of Switzerland. http://histserver.ethz.ch. Accessed 7 Aug 2013.
- Eisner L, Janská E, Oprsal I, Matoušek P (2011) Seismic analysis of the events in the vicinity of the Preese Hall well. In: Pater CJ, Baisch S, Geomechanical study of Bowland Shale seismicity—appendix 3. http://www.cuadrillaresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Geomechanical-Study-Appendix-3-2.11.2011.pdf.
- Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1954) Seismicity of the earth and associated phenomena, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Hallo M, Eisner L, Mohammed YA (2012) Expected level of seismic activity caused by volumetric changes. First Break 30:97–100Google Scholar
- Kanamori H, Anderson L (1975) Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology. Bull Seism Soc Am 65:1073–1095Google Scholar
- Maxwell SC, Shemeta J, Campbell E, Quirk D (2009) Microseismic deformation rate monitoring. EAGE Passive Seismic Workshop, Cyprus, A18.Google Scholar
- Mukuhira Y, Asanuma H, Niitsuma H, Schanz U, Haring M (2008) Characterization of microseismic events with larger magnitude collected at Basel, Switzerland in 2006. Geothermal Resources Council Transactions 32:87–94Google Scholar
- Sammis CG, Saito M, King GCP (1993) Fractals and chaos in the earth sciences. Pure App Geo (Pageoph Topical Volumes) 138(4):532–706Google Scholar
- Urbancic TI, Trifu CI, Mercer RA, Feustel AJ, Alexander JAG (1996) Automatic time-domain calculation of source parameters for the analysis of induced seismicity. Bulletin of Seismological society of America 86(5):1627–1633Google Scholar
- USGS (2012) United States Geological Survey’s (USGS) Earthquake Hazards Program, Global Earthquake Search. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqarchives/. Accessed 7 Aug 2013.
- Vulgamore T, Clawson T, Pope C, Wolhart S, Mayerhofer M, Machovoe S, Waltman C (2007) Applying hydraulic fracture diagnostics to optimize stimulations in the Woodford Shale, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, paper SPE 110029, Anaheim.Google Scholar