Abstract
We propose a method for determining the possible magnitude of a potentially largest induced seismic event derived from the Gutenberg–Richter law and an estimate of total released seismic moment. We emphasize that the presented relationship is valid for induced (not triggered) seismicity, as the total seismic moment of triggered seismicity is not bound by the injection. The ratio of the moment released by the largest event and weaker events is determined by the constants a and b of the Gutenberg–Richter law. We show that for a total released seismic moment, it is possible to estimate number of events greater than a given magnitude. We determine the formula for the moment magnitude of a probable largest seismic event with one occurrence within the recurrence interval (given by one volumetric change caused by mining or injecting). Finally, we compare theoretical and measured values of the moment magnitudes of the largest induced seismic events for selected geothermal and hydraulic fracturing projects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aki K (1981) A probabilistic synthesis of precursors phenomena. Earthquake prediction. Maurice Ewing series, 4 ed. Simson and Richards, AGU: Washington D.C., pp 566–575.
Aki K, Richards PG (1980) Quantitative seismology theory and methods. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco
Anderson JG, Luco JE (1983) Consequences of slip rate constraints on earthquake occurrence relation. Bull Seism Soc Am 73:471–496
Bachmann CE, Wiemer S, Woessner J, Hainzl S (2011) Statistical analysis of the induced Basel 2006 earthquake sequence: introducing a probability-based monitoring approach for enhanced geothermal systems. Geophys J Int 186:793–807
Baisch S, Carbon D, Dannwolf U, Delacou B, Devaux M, Dunand F, Jung R, Koller M, Martin C, Sartori M, Secanell R, Vörös R (2009a) Deep heat mining Basel—seismic risk analysis. SERIANEX study prepared for the Departement für Wirtschaft, Soziales und Umwelt des Kantons Basel-Stadt, Amt für Umwelt und Energie. http://www.wsu.bs.ch/geothermie.
Baisch S, Vörös R, Weidler R, Wyborn D (2009b) Investigation of fault mechanisms during geothermal reservoir stimulation experiments in the Cooper Basin, Australia. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(1):148–158
Barton CA, Zoback MD, Moos D (1995) Fluid flow along potentially active faults in crystalline rock. Geology 23:683–686
Barton D, Foulger G, Henderson J, Julian B (1999) Frequency magnitude statistics and spatial correlation dimensions of earthquakes at Long Valley caldera, California. Geophys J Int 138:563–570
Blewitt G, Coolbaugh M, Holt W, Kreemer C, Davis JL, Bennettal RA (2002) Targeting of potential geothermal resources in the Great Basin from regional relationships between geodetic strain and geological structures. Transactions Geothermal Resources Council 26:523–526
Charlety J, Cuenot N, Dorbath L, Dorbath C, Haessler H, Frogneux M (2007) Large earthquakes during hydraulic stimulations at the geothermal site of Soultz-sous-Forets. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 44:1091–1105
Christensen K, Olami Z (1992) Variation of the Gutenberg-Richter b values and nontrivial temporal correlations in a spring-block model for earthquakes. J Geophys Res 97(B6):8729–8735
Dahm T, Becker D, Bischoff M, Cesca S, Dost B, Fritschen R, Hainzl S, Klose CD, Kühn D, Lasocki S, Meier T, Ohrnberger M, Rivalta E, Wegler U (2013) Recommendation for the discrimination of human-related and natural seismicity. J Seismol 17:197–202
ECOS (2002) Swiss Seismological Service, Earthquake Hazard and Risk, Earthquake Catalog of Switzerland. http://histserver.ethz.ch. Accessed 7 Aug 2013.
Eisner L, Janská E, Oprsal I, Matoušek P (2011) Seismic analysis of the events in the vicinity of the Preese Hall well. In: Pater CJ, Baisch S, Geomechanical study of Bowland Shale seismicity—appendix 3. http://www.cuadrillaresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Geomechanical-Study-Appendix-3-2.11.2011.pdf.
Frohlich C, Hayward C, Stump B, Potter E (2011) The Dallas–Fort Worth earthquake sequence: October 2008 through May 2009. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(1):327–340
Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1954) Seismicity of the earth and associated phenomena, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Hallo M, Eisner L, Mohammed YA (2012) Expected level of seismic activity caused by volumetric changes. First Break 30:97–100
Healy JH, Rubey WW, Griggs DT, Raleigh CB (1968) The Denver earthquakes. Science 161:1,301–1,310
Henderson J, Main I, Pearce R, Takeya M (1994) Seismicity in north-eastern Brazil: fractal clustering and the evolution of the b value. Geophys J Int 116:217–226
Hickman S, Barton CA, Zoback MD, Morin R, Sass J, Benoit R (1997) In situ stress and fracture permeability along the Stillwater fault zone, Dixie Valley, Nevada. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(3):414
Hirata T (1989) A correlation between the b value and the fractal dimension of earthquakes. J Geophys Res 94:7507–7514
Kanamori H (1977) The energy release in great earthquakes. J Geophys Res 82(20):2981–2987
Kanamori H, Anderson L (1975) Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology. Bull Seism Soc Am 65:1073–1095
King G (1983) The accommodation of large strains in the upper lithosphere of the earth and other solids by self-similar fault systems: the geometrical origin of b-value. Pageoph 121:761–815
Lasocki S, Orlecka-Sikora B (2008) Seismic hazard assessment under complex source size distribution of mining-induced seismicity. Tectonophysics 456(1–2):28–37
Mahrer K, Ake J, Block L, O’Connell D, Bundy J (2005) Injecting brine and inducing seismicity at the world’s deepest injection well, Paradox Valley, Southwest Colorado. Dev Water Sci 52:361–375
Manin YI (2006) The notion of dimension in geometry and algebra. Bull Am Math Soc New Ser 43(2):139–161
Mavko G, Mukerji T, Dvorkin J (2009) The rock physics handbook, second edition: tools for seismic analysis of porous media. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Maxwell SC, Shemeta J, Campbell E, Quirk D (2009) Microseismic deformation rate monitoring. EAGE Passive Seismic Workshop, Cyprus, A18.
Maxwell SC, Rutledge J, Jones R, Fehler M (2010) Petroleum reservoir characterization using downhole microseismic monitoring. Geophysics 75(5):129–137
McGarr A (1976) Seismic moments and volume changes. J Geophys Res 81(8):1487–1494
Mukuhira Y, Asanuma H, Niitsuma H, Schanz U, Haring M (2008) Characterization of microseismic events with larger magnitude collected at Basel, Switzerland in 2006. Geothermal Resources Council Transactions 32:87–94
Rutledge JT, Phillips WS (2003) Hydraulic stimulation of natural fractures as revealed by induced microearthquakes, Carthage Cotton Valley gas field, East Texas. Geophysics 68:441–452. doi:10.1190/1.1567214
Rutledge JT, Phillips WS, Mayerhofer MJ (2004) Faulting induced by forced fluid injection and fluid flow forced by faulting: an interpretation of hydraulic-fracture microseismicity, Carthage Cotton Valley Gas Field. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(5):1817–1830
Sammis CG, Saito M, King GCP (1993) Fractals and chaos in the earth sciences. Pure App Geo (Pageoph Topical Volumes) 138(4):532–706
Scholz C (2002) The mechanics of earthquakes and faulting, 2nd edn. Columbia University, New York. ISBN 9780521655408
Schorlemmer D, Wiemer S, Wyss M (2005) Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes. Nature 437:539–542
Shapiro SA, Dinske C, Langenbruch C, Wenzel F (2010) Seismological index and magnitude probability of earthquakes induced during reservoir fluid stimulations. Lead Edge 29:304–309
Shapiro SA, Krüger OS, Dinske C (2013) Probability of inducing given-magnitude earthquakes by perturbing finite volumes of rocks. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 118:1–19. doi:10.1002/jgrb.50264
Turcotte DL (1989) A fractal approach to probabilistic seismic hazard assessment. Tectonophysics 167:171–177
Urbancic TI, Trifu CI, Mercer RA, Feustel AJ, Alexander JAG (1996) Automatic time-domain calculation of source parameters for the analysis of induced seismicity. Bulletin of Seismological society of America 86(5):1627–1633
USGS (2012) United States Geological Survey’s (USGS) Earthquake Hazards Program, Global Earthquake Search. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqarchives/. Accessed 7 Aug 2013.
Vulgamore T, Clawson T, Pope C, Wolhart S, Mayerhofer M, Machovoe S, Waltman C (2007) Applying hydraulic fracture diagnostics to optimize stimulations in the Woodford Shale, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, paper SPE 110029, Anaheim.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the Oil-Subcommittee of the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) and its operating companies (OpCos) for sponsoring the pilot project “Microseismic Feasibility Study”. This study was supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic P210/12/2451. We would like to also thank anonymous reviewers for very valuable advices.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hallo, M., Oprsal, I., Eisner, L. et al. Prediction of magnitude of the largest potentially induced seismic event. J Seismol 18, 421–431 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-014-9417-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-014-9417-4