Journal of Seismology

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 599–611 | Cite as

The seismotectonics of western Skagerrak

  • Mathilde Bøttger Sørensen
  • Peter H. Voss
  • Jens Havskov
  • Søren Gregersen
  • Kuvvet Atakan
Open Access
Original Article


The seismically active Skagerrak region in the border area between Denmark and Norway has traditionally been associated with uncertain earthquake locations due to the limited station coverage in the region. A new seismic station in southern Norway and a recent update of the earthquake database of the Danish National Network have led to a much more complete and homogeneous data coverage of the Skagerrak area, giving the possibility of improved earthquake locations in the region. In this study, we relocate earthquakes in the Skagerrak area to obtain a more exact picture of the seismicity and investigate well-recorded events to determine the depth distribution. Hypocenter depths are found to be generally in the range 11–25 km. Furthermore, new composite focal mechanisms are determined for clusters of events with similar waveforms. Results indicate that the Skagerrak seismicity is associated with shallow, crustal faults oriented in the NS direction south of the Sorgenfrei–Tornquist Zone (STZ) as well as with the STZ itself. Mainly reverse faulting mechanisms along NE–SW oriented faults indicate maximum horizontal compression in the NW–SE direction. This is in agreement with World Stress Map generalizations, most likely associated with ridge push forces from the mid-Atlantic ridge, though modified probably by local crustal weaknesses.


Skagerrak Seismotectonics Seismicity Fault plane solution Hypocenter depth Sorgenfrei-Tornquist zone 


  1. Berthelsen A (1998) The Tornquist zone Northwest of the Carpathians: an intraplate pseudostructure. Geol Fören Stockh Förh 120:223–230Google Scholar
  2. Bungum H, Alsaker A, Kvamme LB, Hansen RA (1991) Seismicity and Seismotectonics of Norway and nearby continental shelf areas. J Geophys Res 96:2249–2265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bungum H, Pettenati F, Schweitzer J, Sirovich L, Faleide JI (2009) The 23 October 1904 Ms5.4 Oslofjord Earthquake: reanalysis based on macroseismic and instrumental data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(5):2836–2854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bungum H, Olesen O, Pascal P, Gibbons S, Londholm C, Vestøl O (2010) The what extent is the present day seismicity in Norway driven by post-glacial rebound? J Geol Soc (Lond) 167:373–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byrkjeland U, Bungum H, Eldholm O (2000) Seismotectonics of the Norwegian continental margin. J Geophys Res 105:6221–6236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cassell BR, Mykkeltveit S, Kanestrøm R, Husebye ES (1983) A North Sea southern Norway seismic crustal profile. Geophys J R Astron Soc 72:733–753Google Scholar
  7. Chapman CH, Orcutt JA (1985) The computation of body wave synthetic seismograms in laterally homogeneous media. Rev Geophys 23:105–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dehls JF, Olesen O, Bungum H, Hicks EC, Lindholm CD, Riis F (2000) Neotectonic map: Norway and adjacent areas. Geological Survey of Norway, SluppenGoogle Scholar
  9. Erlström M, Thomas SA, Deeks N, Sivhed U (1997) Structure and tectonic evolution of the Tornquist Zone and adjacent sedimentary basins in Scania and the southern Baltic Sea area. Tectonophysics 271:191–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. EUGENO-S Working Group (1988) Crustal structure and tectonic evolution of the transition between the Baltic Shield and theNorth German Caledonides (The EUGENO-S Project). Tectonophysics 150:253–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fejerskov M, Lindholm C, Myrvang A, Bungum H (2000) Crustal Stress in and around Norway: a compilation of in situ stress observations. In: Nøttvedt A et al (eds) Dynamics of the Norwegian Margin. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, vol 167, pp 327–378Google Scholar
  12. Fjeldskaar W, Lindholm C, Dehls JF, Fjeldskaar I (2000) Postglacial uplift, neotectonics and seismicity in Fennoscandia. Quat Sci Rev 19:1413–1422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grad M, Tiira T (2007) The Moho depth of the European plate. and
  14. Gregersen S (1979) Earthquakes in the Skagerrak recorded at small distances. Bull Geol Soc Den 28:5–9Google Scholar
  15. Gregersen S (1992) Crustal stress regime in Fennoscandia from focal mechanisms. J Geophys Res 97:11821–11827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gregersen S, Arvidsson R (1992) Atlas map 5, focal mechanisms. In: Blundell D, Freeman R, Mueller S (eds) A continent revealed: the european geotraverse. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Gregersen S, Voss P (2010) Irregularities in Scandinavian postglacial uplift/subsidence in time scales, tens, hundreds, thousands of years. J Geodyn 50:27–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gregersen S, Hjelme J, Hjortenberg E (1996a) Earthquakes in Denmark. Bull Geol Soc Denmark 44:115–127Google Scholar
  19. Gregersen S, Leth J, Lind G, Lykke-Andersen H (1996b) Earthquake activity and its relationship with geologically recent motion in Denmark. Tectonophysics 257:265–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gregersen S, Voss P, Shomali ZH, Grad M, Roberts RG & TOR Working Group (2006) Physical differences in the deep lithosphere of Northern and Central Europe. Geol Soc, London, Memoirs 32:313–322. doi: 10.1144/GSL.MEM.2006.032.01.18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hardebeck JL, Shearer PM (2002) A new method for determining firstmotion focal mechanisms. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:2264–2276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hardebeck JL, Shearer PM (2003) Using S/P amplitude ratios to constrain the focal mechanisms of small earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:2434–2444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Havskov J, Bungum H (1987) Source parameters for earthquakes in the Northern North Sea. Nor Geol Tidsskr 67Google Scholar
  24. Heidbach O, Reinecker J, Tingay M, Müller B, Sperner B, Fuchs K, Wenzel F (2007) Plate boundary forces are not enough: second- and third-order stress patterns highlighted in the World Stress Map database. Tectonics 26:TC6014. doi: 10.1029/2007TC002133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hicks EC (1996) Crustal stresses in Norway and surrounding areas as derived from earthquake focal mechanism solutions and in-situ stress measurements. Cand. Scient., University of OsloGoogle Scholar
  26. Hicks EC, Bungum H, Lindholm CD (2000) Stress inversion of earthquake focal mechanism solutions from onshore and offshore Norway. Nor Geol Tidsskr 80:235–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Larsen TB, Gregersen S, Voss PH, Bidstrup T, Orozova-Bekkevold V (2008) The earthquake that shook central Sjælland, Denmark, November 6, 2001. Bull Geol Soc Denmark 56:1–11Google Scholar
  28. Lehmann I (1956) Danish earthquakes. Medd Geol Soc Den 13:88–103 (in Danish)Google Scholar
  29. Lie JE, Husebye ES (1993) Seismic imaging of upper crustal basement faults in the Skagerrak Sea. Tectonophysics 219:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lie JE, Husebye ES (1994) Simple-shear deformation of the Skagerrak lithosphere during the formation of the Oslo Rift. Tectonophysics 232:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lie JE, Andersson M (1998) The deep-seismic image of the crustal structure of the Tornquist Zone beneath the Skagerrak Sea, Northwestern Europe. Tectonophysics 287:139–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lindholm CD, Bungum H, Bratli RK, Aadnøy BS, Dahl N, Tørudbakken B, Atakan K (1995) Crustal Stress in the northern North Sea as inferred from borehole breakouts and earthquake focal mechanisms. Terra Nova 7:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindholm C, Bungum H, Hicks E, Villagran M (2000) Crustal stress and tectonics in Norwegian regions determined from earthquake focal mechanisms. Geol Soc London, Special Publications 167:429–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Longva O, Thorsnes T (1997) Skagerrak in the past and the present—and integrated study of geology, chemistry, hydrogeography and microfossil ecology. Nor Geol Unders 8:100Google Scholar
  35. Medhus AB, Balling N, Jacobsen BH, Weidle C, Voss P, England RW, Kind R, Thybo H (2011) Upper mantle structure beneath the southern Scandes Mountains and the northern Tornquist Zone revealed by P-wave travel time tomography. Geophys J Int (in revision)Google Scholar
  36. Pedersen T, Gregersen S, Tor Working Group (1999) Project Tor: deep lithospheric variation across the Sorgenfrei-Tornquist Zone, southern Scandinavia. Bull Geol Soc Den 46:13–24Google Scholar
  37. Reinecker J, Heidbach O, Tinagy M, Sperner B, Müller B (2005) The release 2005 of the World Stress Map. Available online at
  38. Scheck-Wenderoth M, Lamarche J (2005) Crustal memory and basin evolution in the Central European Basin System—new insights from a 3D structural model. Tectonophysics 297:143–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Slunga R, Norrman P, Glans A-C (1984) The seismicity of southern Sweden. FOA Report C20545-T1, National Defense Research InstituteGoogle Scholar
  40. Tesauro M, Kaban MK, Cloetingh SAPL (2008) EuCRUST-07: a new reference model for the European crust. Geophys Res Lett 35:L05313. doi: 10.1029/2007GL032244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thybo H (1997) Geophysical characteristics of the Tornquist Fan area, northwest Trans-European Suture Zone: indication of late Carboneferous to early Permian dextral transtension. Geol Mag 134:597–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thybo H (2000) Crustal structure and tectonic evolution of the Tornquist fan region as revealed by geophysical methods. Bull Dan Geol Soc 46:145–160Google Scholar
  43. Vejbæk OV, Britze P (1994) Geological map of Denmark 1: 750 000, top pre-Zechstein. Geological Survey of Denmark, Map series No. 45Google Scholar
  44. Ziegler PA (1990) Geological atlas of Western and Central Europe. Elsevier, The Hague, Shell International Petrolium Maatschappij/AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  45. Zoback ML (1992) First- and second-order patterns of stress in the lithosphere: the world stress map project. J Geophys Res 97:11703–11728CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mathilde Bøttger Sørensen
    • 1
  • Peter H. Voss
    • 2
  • Jens Havskov
    • 1
  • Søren Gregersen
    • 2
  • Kuvvet Atakan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Earth ScienceUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
  2. 2.Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland - GEUSCopenhagen KDenmark

Personalised recommendations