Journal of Seismology

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 265–279 | Cite as

Broadband strong motion simulation in layered half-space using stochastic Green’s function technique

Original article

Abstract

The stochastic Green’s function method, which simulates one component of the far-field S-waves from an extended fault plane at high frequencies (Kamae et al., J Struct Constr Eng Trans AIJ, 430:1–9, 1991), is extended to simulate the three components of the full waveform in layered half-spaces for broadband frequency range. The method firstly computes ground motions from small earthquakes, which correspond to the ruptures of sub-faults on a fault plane of a large earthquake, and secondly constructs the strong motions of the large earthquake by superposing the small ground motions using the empirical Green’s function technique (e.g., Irikura, Proc 7th Japan Earthq Eng Symp, 151–156, 1986). The broadband stochastic omega-square model is proposed as the moment rate functions of the small earthquakes, in which random and zero phases are used at higher and lower frequencies, respectively. The zero phases are introduced to simulate a smooth ramp function of the moment function with the duration of 1/fc s (fc: the corner frequency) and to reproduce coherent strong motions at low frequencies (i.e., the directivity pulse). As for the radiation coefficients, the theoretical values of double couple sources for lower frequencies and the theoretical isotropic values for the P-, SV-, and SH-waves (Onishi and Horike, J Struct Constr Eng Trans AIJ, 586:37–44, 2004) for high frequencies are used. The proposed method uses the theoretical Green’s functions of layered half-spaces instead of the far-field S-waves, which reproduce the complete waves including the direct and reflected P- and S-waves and surface waves at broadband frequencies. Finally, the proposed method is applied to the 1994 Northridge earthquake, and results show excellent agreement with the observation records at broadband frequencies. At the same time, the method still needs improvements especially because it underestimates the high-frequency vertical components in the near fault range. Nonetheless, the method will be useful for modeling high frequency contributions in the hybrid methods, which use stochastic and deterministic methods for high and low frequencies, respectively (e.g., the stochastic Green’s function method + finite difference methods; Kamae et al., Bull Seism Soc Am, 88:357–367, 1998; Pitarka et al., Bull Seism Soc Am 90:566–586, 2000), because it reproduces the full waveforms in layered media including not only random characteristics at higher frequencies but also theoretical and deterministic coherencies at lower frequencies.

Keywords

Broadband strong motion simulation Omega-squared model Green’s function of layered half-spaces Stochastic Green’s function method Empirical Green’s function method The scaling law 1994 Northridge earthquake 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aki K, Richards PG (1980) Quantitative seismology. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben-Menahem A, Toksoz MN (1963) Source mechanism from spectrums of long period surface waves. J Geophys Res 68:5207–5222Google Scholar
  3. Boore DM (1983) Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra. Bull Seism Soc Am 73:1865–1894Google Scholar
  4. Boore DM, Boatwright J (1984) Average body-wave radiation coefficient. Bull Seism Soc Am 74:1615–1621Google Scholar
  5. Brune JN (1970) Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquake. J Geophys Res 75:4997–5009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burger RW, Somerville PG et al (1987) The effect of crustal structure on strong ground motion attenuation relations in eastern north America. Bull Seism Soc Am 77:420–439Google Scholar
  7. Eshelby JD (1957) The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems. Proc Roy Soc A241:376–396Google Scholar
  8. Guatteri M, Mai P, Beroza G (2004) A pseudo-dynamic approximation to dynamic rupture models for strong ground motion prediction. Bull Seism Soc Am 94:2051–2063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hartzell S, Mariagiovanna G et al (2005) Calculation of broadband time histories of ground motion, Part II: kinematic and dynamic modeling using theoretical Green’s functions and comparison with the 1994 Northridge earthquake. Bull Seism Soc Am 95:614–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Herrero A, Bernard P (1994) A kinematic self-similar rupture process for earthquake. Bull Seism Soc Am 84:1216–1228Google Scholar
  11. Hisada Y (1995) An efficient method for computing Green’s functions for a layered half-space with sources and receivers at close repths (Part 2). Bull Seism Soc Am 85:1080–1093Google Scholar
  12. Hisada Y (2000) A theoretical omega-squared model considering the spatial variation in slip and rupture velocity. Bull Seism Soc Am 90:387–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hisada Y (2001) A theoretical omega-squared model considering the spatial variation in slip and rupture velocity. Part 2: case for two-dimensional source model. Bull Seism Soc Am 91:651–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Irikura K (1983) Semi-empirical estimation of strong ground motions during large earthquakes. Bull Disas Prev Res Inst 33:63–104Google Scholar
  15. Irikura K (1986) Prediction of strong ground acceleration motions using empirical Green’s function. Proc 7th Japan Earthq Eng Symp, pp 151–156Google Scholar
  16. Kagawa T (2004) Developing a stochastic Green’s function method having more accuracy in long period range to be used in the hybrid method. J Jpn Assoc Earthqu Eng 4:21–32 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  17. Kamae K, Irikura K, Fukuchi Y (1991) Prediction of strong ground motion based on scaling law of earthquake by stochastic synthesis method. J Struct Constr Eng Trans AIJ No430:1–9 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  18. Kamae K, Irikura K, Pitarka A (1998) A technique for simulating strong ground motion using hybrid Green’s function. Bull Seism Soc Am 88:357–367Google Scholar
  19. Onishi Y, Horike M (2004) The extended stochastic simulation method for close-fault earthquake motion prediction and comments for its application to the hybrid method. J Struct Constr Eng Trans AIJ 586:37–44Google Scholar
  20. Pitarka A, Somerville P et al (2000) Simulation of near-fault ground-motion using hybrid Green’s functions. Bull Seism Soc Am 90:566–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tsuruki M, Kagawa T et al (2006) Study on a high-cut filter for strong ground motion prediction – based on the observed records during the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nambu Earthquake. J Jpn Assoc Earthqu Eng 6:94–112 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  22. Wald DJ, Heaton TH, Hudnut KW (1996) The slip history of the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake determined from strong motion, teleseismic, GPS, and leveling data. Bull Seism Soc Am 86:49–70Google Scholar
  23. Yokoi T, Irikura K (1991) Empirical green’s function technique based on the scaling law of source spectra. J Seism Soc of Japan Second Series, 44:109–122 (in Japanese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ArchitectureKogakuin UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations