Journal of Seismology

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 133–143 | Cite as

A seismological overview of long-period ground motion

Original article

Abstract

Long-period ground motion has become an increasingly important consideration because of the recent rapid increase in the number of large-scale structures, such as high-rise buildings and oil storage tanks. Large subduction-zone earthquakes and moderate to large crustal earthquakes can generate far-source long-period ground motions in distant sedimentary basins with the help of path effects. Near-fault long-period ground motions are generated, for the most part, by the source effects of forward rupture directivity. Far-source long-period ground motions consist primarily of surface waves with longer durations than near-fault long-period ground motions. They were first recognized in the seismograms of the 1968 Tokachi-oki and 1966 Parkfield earthquakes, and their identification has been applied to the 1964 Niigata earthquake and earlier earthquakes. Even if there is no seismogram, we can identify far-source long-period ground motions through the investigation of tank damage by liquid sloshing.

Keywords

Far-source long-period ground motion Near-fault long-period ground motion Source effect Path effect Site effect Liquid sloshing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aki K (1968) Seismic displacements near a fault. J Geophys Res 73:5359–5376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck JL, Hall JF (1986) Factors contributing to the catastrophe in Mexico City during the earthquake of September 19, 1985. Geophys Res Lett 13:593–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Celebi M, Prince J, Dietel C, Onate M, Chavez G (1987) The culprit in Mexico City—amplification of motions. Earthq Spectra 3:315–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dziewonski AM, Franz JE, Woodhouse JH (1983) Centroid-moment tensor solutions for April–June, 1983. Phys Earth Planet Inter 33:243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. FDMA (Fire and Disaster Management Agency) (1965) Study on the 1964 Niigata Earthquake Fire. FDMA, Tokyo, p 224 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  6. FDMA (Fire and Disaster Management Agency) (1979) Report on damage of oil storage tanks in the Sendai refinery. FDMA, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  7. Fukuwa N (2008) Key parameters governing the dynamic response of long-period structures. J Seismol (this issue)Google Scholar
  8. Furumura T (2005) Computer simulation of long-period ground motions associated by large subduction zone earthquakes. 2nd International Workshop on Strong ground Motion Prediction and Earthquake Tectonics in Urban Areas, pp 143–148Google Scholar
  9. Furumura T, Hayakawa T (2007) Anomalous propagation of long-period ground motions recorded in Tokyo during the 23 October 2004 M W 6.6 Niitgata-ken Chuetsu, Japan, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:863–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Furumura T, Kennett BLN (1998) On the nature of regional seismic phases—III. The influence of crustal heterogeneity on the wavefield for subduction earthquakes: the 1985 Michoacan and 1995 Copala, Guerrero, Mexico earthquakes. Geophys J Int 135:1060–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Furumura T, Koketsu K (1998) Specific distribution of ground motion during the 1995 Kobe earthquake and its generation mechanism. Geophys Res Lett 25:785–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Furumura T, Koketsu K, Wen K-L (2002) Parallel PSM/FDM hybrid simulation of ground motions from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake. Pure Appl Geophys 159:2133–2146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Graves RW, Wald DJ (2004) Observed and simulated ground motions in the San Bernardino basin region for the Hector Mine, California, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:131–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graves RW, Pitarka A, Somerville PG (1998) Ground-motion amplification in the Santa Monica area: Effects of shallow basin-edge structure. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88:1224–1242Google Scholar
  15. Hanks TC (1975) Strong ground motion of the San Fernando, California, earthquake: ground displacements. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65:193–225Google Scholar
  16. Hatayama K (2008) Lessons from the 2003 Tokachi-oki, Japan, earthquake for prediction of long-period strong ground motions and sloshing damage to oil storage tanks. J Seismol (this issue)Google Scholar
  17. Heaton TH, Hall DF, Wald DJ, Halling MW (1995) Response of high-rise and base-isolated buildings to a hypothetical M 7.0 blind thrust earthquake. Science 267:206–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hirano M (1982) The great Kanto earthquake disaster and Yokosuka naval port. Suiro 41 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  19. Horoun MA (1983) Behavior of unanchored oil storage tanks: Imperial Valley earthquake. J Tech Topics Civil Eng 109:23–40Google Scholar
  20. Iwaki A, Iwata T (2008) Validation of 3D basin structure models for long-period ground motion simulation in the Osaka basin, western Japan. J Seismol (this issue)Google Scholar
  21. Iwata T, Sekiguchi H, Pitarka A, Irikura K (1999) Ground motion simulations in the Kobe area during the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake. In: Irikura K, Kudo K, Okada H, Sasatani S (eds) The effects of surface geology on seismic motion, vol. 3. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1369–1376Google Scholar
  22. JSCE (Japan Society of Civil Engineers) (2000) Damage to industrial facilities. Kocaeli (Turkey) Earthquake, JSCE, Tokyo 7:1–20Google Scholar
  23. Joyner WB (2000) Strong motion from surface waves in deep sedimentary basins. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90:S95–S112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kanamori H (1979) A semi-empirical approach to prediction of long-period ground motions from great earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 69:1645–1670Google Scholar
  25. Kawabe K, Kamae K (2008) Prediction of long-period ground motions from huge subduction earthquakes in Osaka, Japan. J Seismol (this issue)Google Scholar
  26. Kawase H, Aki K (1989) A study on the response of a soft basin for incident S, P, and Rayleigh waves with special reference to the long duration observed in Mexico City. Bull Seismol Soc Am 79:1361–1382Google Scholar
  27. Koketsu K, Hatayama K, Furumura T, Ikegami Y, Akiyama S (2005) Damaging long-period ground motions from the 2003 Mw 8.3 Tokachi-oki, Japan, earthquake. Seismol Res Lett 76:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kudo K, Sakaue M (1984) Oil-sloshing in the huge tanks at Niigata due to the Nihonkai-chubu earthquake of 1983. Bull Earthq Res Inst Univ Tokyo 59:361–381Google Scholar
  29. Kudo K, Uetake T, Kanno T (2000) Re-evaluation of nonlinear site response during the 1964 Niigata earthquake using the strong motion records at Kawagishi-cho, Niigata City. Proc 12th World Conf Earthq Eng no.0969Google Scholar
  30. Mamula L, Kudo K, Shima E (1984) Distribution of ground-motion amplification factors as a function of period (3–15 sec), in Japan. Bull Earthq Res Inst Univ Tokyo 59:467–500Google Scholar
  31. Miyake H, Koketsu K (2005) Long-period ground motions from a large offshore earthquake: the case of the 2004 off the Kii peninsula earthquake, Japan. Earth Planets Space 57:203–207Google Scholar
  32. Manos GC, Clough RW (1985) Tank damage during the May 1983 Coalinga earthquake. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 13:449–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ohta T, Zama S (2005) Large earthquakes and large-scale structures. Kyoritsu Shuppan, Tokyo, p 287 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  34. Olsen KB, Day SM, Minster JB, Cui Y, Chourasia A, Faerman M, Moore R, Maechling P, Jordan T (2006) Strong shaking in Los Angeles expected from southern San Andreas earthquake. Geophys Res Lett 33:L07305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Olsen KB, Day SM, Minster JB, Cui Y, Chourasia A, Okaya D, Maechling P, Jordan T (2008) TeraShake2: simulation of Mw7.7 earthquakes on the southern San Andreas fault with spontaneous rupture description. Bull Seismol Soc Am (in press)Google Scholar
  36. Pitarka A, Irikura K, Iwata T, Sekiguchi H (1998) Three-dimensional simulation of the near-fault ground motion for the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu (Kobe), Japan, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88:428–440Google Scholar
  37. Rinne JE (1967) Oil storage tanks. In: Wood FJ (ed) The Prince William Sound, Alaska, Earthquake of 1964 and Aftershocks. vol. 2A. US Government Printing Office, Washington, 2A: 245–252Google Scholar
  38. Ruff L, Kanamori H (1983) The rupture process and asperity distribution of three great earthquakes from long-period diffracted P-waves. Phys Earth Planet Inter 31:202–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sakajiri N, Naruse S, Takeuchi F, Yoshikawa K, Goto N, Ohta Y (1974) Observation of 1- to 5-sec microtremors and their application to earthquake engineering, Part I. Preliminary observation in Hachinohe. Zisin 27:338–351Google Scholar
  40. Sato T, Graves RW, Somerville PG (1999) Three-dimensional finite-difference simulations of long-period strong motions in the Tokyo metropolitan area during the 1990 Odawara earthquake (M J 5.1) and the great 1923 Kanto earthquake (M S 8.2) in Japan. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:579–607Google Scholar
  41. Seno T, Shimazaki K, Somerville P, Sudo K, Eguchi T (1980) Rupture process of the Miyagi-oki, Japan, earthquake of June 12, 1978. Phys Earth Planet Int 23:39–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shapiro NM, Olsen KB, Singh SK (2000) Wave-guide effects in subduction zones: evidence from three-dimensional modeling. Geophys Res Lett 27:433–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shapiro NM, Olsen KB, Singh SK (2002) On the duration of seismic motion incident onto the Valley of Mexico for subduction zone earthquakes. Geophy J Int 151:501–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shibata H (1971) General aspects of San Fernando earthquakes, Feb. 9, 1971. Seisan Kenkyu 23:314–316 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  45. Shibata H (1974) Survey report on earthquake damage of industrial facilities in the world—spherical vessels and cylindrical vessels. Seisan Kenkyu 26:259–264 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  46. Shima E (1970) Seismic surface waves detected by the strong motion acceleration seismograph. Proc 3rd Jpn Earthq Eng Symp, pp 277–284Google Scholar
  47. Somerville PG (2003) Magnitude scaling of the near fault rupture directivity pulse. Phys Earth Planet Inter 137:201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Somerville PG, Smith NF, Graves RW, Abrahamson NA (1997) A modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity. Seismol Res Lett 68:199–222Google Scholar
  49. Steinbrugge KV (1970) Earthquake damage and structural performance in the United States. In: Wiegel RL (ed) Earthquake engineering. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 167–226Google Scholar
  50. Steinbrugge KV, Moran DF (1954) An engineering study of the southern California earthquake of July 21, 1952 and its aftershocks. Bull Seismol Soc Am 44:201–462Google Scholar
  51. Trifunac MD, Brune JN (1970) Complexity of energy release during the Imperial Valley, California, earthquake of 1940. Bull Seismol Soc Am 60:137–160Google Scholar
  52. Wald DJ, Somerville PG (1995) Variable-slip rupture model of the great 1923 Kanto, Japan, earthquake: Geodetic and body-waveform analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85:159–177Google Scholar
  53. Yamada N, Iwata T (2005) Long-period ground motion simulation in the Kinki area during the MJ 7.1 foreshock of the 2004 off the Kii peninsula earthquakes. Earth Planets Space 57:197–202Google Scholar
  54. Yoshida S, Zama S et al (2000) Report on damage to oil storage tanks by the Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake. J High Pressure Inst Jpn 38(6):23–34Google Scholar
  55. Yoshiwara H, Zama S, Kamei A (1984) Sloshing and its damage in oil storage tanks due to the 1983 Japan Sea earthquake. Tech Rep Nat Res Inst Fire Disas 14:31–46 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  56. Zama S (1993) Long-period strong ground motion. Zisin 46:329–342 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  57. Zama S, Inoue R (1994) Sloshing of liquid in oil storage tanks due to the 1993 Hokkaido Nansei-oki earthquake. Rep Fire Res Inst Jpn 77:1–10 (in Japanese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Earthquake Research InstituteUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations