Advertisement

Journal of Russian Laser Research

, Volume 39, Issue 6, pp 568–574 | Cite as

EIT Ground State Cooling Scheme of 171Yb+ Based on the 2S1/22P1/2 Cooling Transition

  • I. A. SemerikovEmail author
  • I. V. Zalivako
  • A. S. Borisenko
  • K. Y. Khabarova
  • N. N. Kolachevsky
Article
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

We propose a method for EIT ground state cooling of 171Yb+ ion, which involves three light fields with detuning on a MHz scale. The steady-state mean vibrational quantum number is calculated to be less than 0.005. Efficient cooling is achievable in a motional-mode frequency range of 2π · (1.5 ± 0.5 MHz).

Keywords

ion laser cooling sideband cooling EIT cooling ground motional state 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    N. Huntemann, C. Sanner, B. Lipphardt, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 063001 (2016).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. L. Tjoelker, J. D. Prestage, et al., IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 1034 (2016).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. M. Godun, P. B. R. Nisbet-Jones, J. M. Jones, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, 1 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Hrter and J. Hecker Denschlag, Contemp. Phys., 55, 33 (2014).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Zhang, G. Pagano, P. W. Hess, et al., Nature, 551, 601 (2017).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Debnath, N. M. Linke, C. Figgatt, et al., Nature, 536, 63 (2016).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. S. Letokhov, JETP Lett., 7, 348 (1968).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Leibfried, R. Blatt, C. Monroe, and D. Wineland, Rev. Mod. Phys., 75, 281 (2003).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. H. Dicke, Phys. Rev., 89, 472 (1953).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. Diedrich, J. C. Bergquist, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. Lett., 62, 403 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Hemmerling, F. Gebert, Y. Wan, et al., Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt., 104, 583 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Morigi, J. Eschner, and C. Keitel, Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 4458 (2000).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. F. Roos, D. Leibfried, A. Mundt, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 5547 (2000).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    I. Zalivako, I. Semerikov, A. Borisenko, et al., in: The European Frequency and Time Forum (April 10–12, 2018, National Museum of Automobiles, Torino, Italy), p. 344.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. Lechner, C. Maier, C. Hempel, et al., Phys. Rev. A, 93, 1 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Evers and C. H. Keitel, Europhys. Lett., 68, 370 (2004).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. A. Semerikov
    • 1
    Email author
  • I. V. Zalivako
    • 1
  • A. S. Borisenko
    • 1
  • K. Y. Khabarova
    • 1
  • N. N. Kolachevsky
    • 1
  1. 1.Lebedev Physical Institute, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations