Advertisement

Journal of Russian Laser Research

, Volume 39, Issue 5, pp 448–455 | Cite as

Single-Step Traveling-Wave Quantum State Engineering in the Coherent State Representation

  • Gabor Mogyorosi
  • Emese Molnar
  • Matyas Mechler
  • Peter Adam
Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

We describe a recently introduced single-step traveling-wave quantum state engineering scheme using the one-dimensional coherent-state representation introduced by Janszky. In this representation, the photon number expansion of the output state is derived in a compact formula that is advantageous for numerical optimization. Using this formula, we determine several sets of physically controllable parameters of the scheme yielding various nonclassical target states.

Keywords

one-dimensional coherent state representation quantum state engineering nonclassical states 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, B. M. Nielsen, C. Hettich, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 97, 083604 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Ourjoumtsev, H. Jeong, R. Tualle-Brouri, and P. Grangier, Nature, 448, 784 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Takahashi, K. Wakui, S. Suzuki, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, 233605 (2008).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Gerrits, S. Glancy, T. S. Clement, et al., Phys. Rev. A, 82, 031802 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Etesse, M. Bouillard, B. Kanseri, and R. Tualle-Brouri, Phys. Rev. Lett., 114, 193602 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Huang, H. Le Jeannic, J. Ruaudel, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 115, 023602 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Dakna, J. Clausen, L. Knöll, and D.-G. Welsch, Phys. Rev. A, 59, 1658 (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Fiurášek, R. García-Patrón, and N. J. Cerf, Phys. Rev. A, 72, 033822 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.-Y. Lee and H. Nha, Phys. Rev. A, 82, 053812 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Sperling, W. Vogel, and G. S. Agarwal, Phys. Rev. A, 89, 043829 (2014).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Molnar, P. Adam, G. Mogyorosi, and M. Mechler, Phys. Rev. A, 97, 023818 (2018).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Janszky, P. Domokos, and P. Adam, Phys. Rev. A, 48, 2213 (1993).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Janszky, P. Domokos, S. Szab¨o, and P. Adam, Phys. Rev. A, 51, 4191 (1995).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Szabö, P. Adam, J. Janszky, and P. Domokos, Phys. Rev. A, 53, 2698 (1996).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. Adam, E. Molnar, G. Mogyorosi, et al., Phys. Scr., 90, 074021 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Mogyorosi, P. Adam, E. Molnar, and M. Mechler, “Single-step quantum state engineering in traveling optical fields,” arXiv:1804.07920 [quant-ph] (2018).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Janszky and A. V. Vinogradov, Phys. Rev. Lett., 64, 2771 (1990).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. Adam, J. Janszky, and A. V. Vinogradov, Opt. Commun., 80, 155 (1990).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    P. Adam, J. Janszky, and A. V. Vinogradov, Phys. Lett. A, 160, 506 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    P. Adam, I. F¨oldesi, and J. Janszky, Phys. Rev. A, 49, 1281 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    P. Domokos, P. Adam, and J. Janszky, Phys. Rev. A, 50, 4293 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    I. Földesi, P. Adam, and J. Janszky, Phys. Lett. A, 204, 16 (1995).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    S. Szabö, P. Domokos, P. Adam, and J. Janszky, Phys. Lett. A, 241, 203 (1998).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. Janszky, P. Adam, M. Bertolotti, and C. Sibilia, Quantum Opt., 4, 163 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    I. Urizar-Lanz and G. Tóth, Phys. Rev. A, 81, 052108 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    P. Adam, M. Mechler, V. Szalay, and M. Koniorczyk, Phys. Rev. A, 89, 062108 (2014).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    P. Marek and J. Fiurášek, Phys. Rev. A, 79, 062321 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    P. Marek, R. Filip, and A. Furusawa, Phys. Rev. A, 84, 053802 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    K. Miyata, H. Ogawa, P. Marek, et al., Phys. Rev. A, 93, 022301 (2016).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    T. C. Ralph, A. Gilchrist, G. J. Milburn, et al., Phys. Rev. A, 68, 042319 (2003).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    A. P. Lund, T. C. Ralph, and H. L. Haselgrove, Phys. Rev. Lett., 100, 030503 (2008).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    D. E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA (1989).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    M. Dakna, T. Anhut, T. Opatrný, et al., Phys. Rev. A, 55, 3184 (1997).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    A. P. Lund, H. Jeong, T. C. Ralph, and M. S. Kim, Phys. Rev. A, 70, 020101 (2004).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabor Mogyorosi
    • 1
  • Emese Molnar
    • 1
  • Matyas Mechler
    • 1
  • Peter Adam
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Physics, University of PécsPécsHungary
  2. 2.Institute for Solid State Physics and OpticsWigner Research Centre for Physics, Hungarian Academy of SciencesBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations