Journal of Russian Laser Research

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 55–65 | Cite as

Energetic barrier reduction at the carbyne film interface

  • Yu. E. Prazdnikov
  • A. D. Bozhko
  • N. D. Novikov
Article

Abstract

An abnormal injection current density through SiO2 has been observed recently for both signs of charge carriers in experiments with an oriented carbyne film grown on a SiO2 layer. The absence of a surface leakage current and the insulating property of SiO2 were experimentally proved. The temperature dependence of the current through SiO2 showed low activation energy and confirmed the model of thermally activated injection. A strong influence of the electric field applied transverse to the carbon chains on the current through SiO2 was observed. A model of energetic barrier reduction at the carbyne interface based on the hypothesis of transverse inter-chain hopping in the electric field was proposed. It was shown that a transverse electric field can be induced in a carbyne film as in one-dimensional media. The first organic light emitting device with a carbyne-based effective injector was fabricated.

Keywords

carbyne nanoinjection nanoemission 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Y. P. Kudryavtsev, S. E. Evsykov, V. G. Babaev, et al., Carbon, 30, 213 (1992).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. B. Heimann, S. E. Evsyukov, L. Kavan, Carbyne and Carbynoid Structures, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1999).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Baeyer, Ueber Polyacetylenverbindungen, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges., 18, 674 (1885); 18, 2269 (1885).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. M. Sladkov, V. I. Kasatochkin, V. V. Korshak, et al., Inventor’s Certification, No. 107 (December 7, 1971), Priority date November 4, 1960.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. A. Goresy and G. Donnay, Science, 161 363 (1968).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. P. Kudryavtsev, S. Evsyukov, M. Guseva, et al., Chemistry and Physics of Carbon, Marcel Dekker, New York, 25, 5 (1997).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. S. Casari, A. Li Bassi, L. Ravagnan, et al., Phys. Rev. B, 69, 075422 (2004).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. P. Kudryavtsev, S. E. Evsykov, V. G. Babaev, et al., Carbon, 30(2), 213 (1992).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Patent US 6,355 350 B1, Tetracarbon (2002).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Patent US 6,454 797 B2, Tetracarbon (2002).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. G. Babaev, M. B. Guseva, N. F. Savchenko, Poverhn. Rentgen. Sinhrotr. Neytron. Issled., 3, 16 (2004).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. B, Cond. Mater., 25, 3798 (1982).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. B. Heimann, Diamond Relat. Mater., 3, 1151 (1994).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. R. Heath, Q. Zhang, S. C. O’Brian, et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 109, 359 (1987).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. G. Simmons, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 32, 1987 (1971); 32 2581 (1971).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Modinos, Field, Thermionic, and Secondary Electron Emission Spectroscopy, Plenum Press, New York (1984), pp. 13–24.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Y. E. Prazdnikov, A. D. Bozhko, M. B. Guseva, and N. D. Novikov, Vestnik MGU, 5, 37 (2004).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ming-Chi Kan, Jow-Lay Huang, James C. Sung, et al., Carbon, 41, 2839 (2003).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. N. Obraztsov, A. P. Volkov, Al. A. Zakhidov, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci., 215, 214 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. N. Fursey, D. V. Novikov, G. A. Dyuzhev, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci., 215, 135 (2003).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu. E. Prazdnikov
    • 1
  • A. D. Bozhko
    • 2
  • N. D. Novikov
    • 2
  1. 1.P. N. Lebedev Physical InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsM. V. Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations