Advertisement

Germ-Inating Solutions or Gene-Rating Problems: An Islamic Perspective on Human Germline Gene Editing

  • Ismail LalaEmail author
Original Paper
  • 91 Downloads

Abstract

Human germline gene editing (hGGE) poses many questions for the Muslim community. They range from the scientific: is there sufficient evidence that hGGE is better than existing technologies? To the ethical: is the lack of consent an insurmountable hurdle? What is the moral status of the embryo? What effect would hGGE have on societal inequalities? And, most crucially, can hGGE be interdicted on the basis of preventing its ineluctable use in eugenic programming? This paper confronts these issues from a religious perspective basing its judgements and reasoning on traditional sources of Islamic jurisprudence. It concludes that, except in very few instances that must be individual and case-specific, hGGE is not congruent with the tenets of Islam.

Keywords

Islam Bioethics Human germline gene editing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to express his gratitude for the support of the Centre of Islam and Medicine (CIM) where an earlier version of this paper was presented. A special mention must also be made of Arzoo Ahmed, the Director of CIM, who first suggested this topic.

Compliance with Ethical Standard

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Alipour, M. (2017). Islamic shari’a law, neotraditionalist Muslim scholars and transgender sex-reassignment surgery: A case study of Ayatollah Khomeini’s and Sheikh al-Tantawi’s fatwas. International Journal of Transgenderism, 18(1), 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Ālūsī, A. (2005). Rūḥ al-ma‘ānī fī tafsīr al-qur’ān al-‘aẓīm wa’l-sab‘ al-mathānī. Cairo: Dār al-Ḥadīth.Google Scholar
  3. Al-Bābartī, M. (n.d.). Al-‘Ināyah sharḥ al-hidāya. n.p.: n.p.Google Scholar
  4. Barrett, J. (2004). Why would anyone believe in God?. Lanham: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  5. Al-Bukhārī, M. (2009). Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.Google Scholar
  6. Collins, F. (2015, April). Statement on NIH funding of research using gene-editing technologies in human embryos. Retrieved from: https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/who-we-are/nih-director/statements/statement-nih-funding-research-using-gene-editing-technologies-human-embryos.
  7. Cwik, B. (2017). Designing ethical trials of germline gene editing. The New England Journal of Medicine, 377(20), 1911–1913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Darnovsky, M. (2015). Public interest group calls for strengthening global policies against human germline modification. April, 2015. https://www.geneticsandsociety.org/press-statement/public-interest-group-calls-strengthening-global-policies-against-human-germline?id=8528.
  9. Friedmann, T., Jonlin, E. C., King, N. M. P., Torbett, B. E., Wivel, N. A., Kaneda, Y., et al. (2015). ASGCT and JSGT joint position statement on human genomic editing. Molecular Therapy, 23(8), 1282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fuqahā’ al-Kuwayt. (1984). Al-Mawsū‘a al-fiqhiyya al-kuwaytiyya. Kuwait: Dār al-Salāsil.Google Scholar
  11. Gyngell, C., Douglas, T., & Savulescu, J. (2017). The ethics of germline gene editing. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 34(4), 498–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Habermas, J. (2003). The future of human nature. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  13. Ḥākim, A. (n.d.). Al-Mustdrak ‘ala’l-ṣaḥīḥayn. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.Google Scholar
  14. Hallaq, W. (1997). A history of Islamic legal theories: An introduction to Sunnī Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harris, J. (2007). Enhancing evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Al-Ḥaṣkafī, M. (2002). Al-Durr al-mukhtār. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.Google Scholar
  17. Al-Hintātī, A. (n.d.). Maṭali‘ al-tamām wa naṣā’iḥ al-anām. n.p.: n.p.Google Scholar
  18. Ibn ‘Ābidīn al-Shāmī, M. (2000). Radd al-muhtār ‘alā al-durr al-mukhtār sharḥ tanwīr al-abṣār. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.Google Scholar
  19. Ibn Aḥmad, ‘A. (1996). Al-Madkhal ilā madhhab al-imām Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.Google Scholar
  20. Ibn ‘Arabī, M. (2002). Fuṣūṣ al-ḥikam. Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-‘Arabī.Google Scholar
  21. Ibn Ḥanbal, A. (n.d.). Musnad Aḥmad. Cairo: Mu’assasat Qurṭuba.Google Scholar
  22. Ibn Kathīr, ‘I. (1998). Tafsīr al-qur’ān al-‘aẓīm. Damascus: Maktabat Dār al-Fīḥā’.Google Scholar
  23. Ibn Mājah, A. (n.d.). Sunan Ibn Mājah. n.p.: Maktabat Abu’l-Mu‘āṭī.Google Scholar
  24. Ibn Nujaym, Z. (2003). Al-Ashbāh wa’l-naẓā’ir. Beirut: Dār al-‘Aṣriyya.Google Scholar
  25. Ibn Nujaym, Z. (n.d.). Al-Baḥr al-rā’iq sharḥ kanz al-daqā’iq. n.p.: n.p.Google Scholar
  26. Ibn Ṣadr al-Shahīd, B. (n.d.). Al-Muḥīṭ al-burhānī. n.p.: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī.Google Scholar
  27. Ibn al-Subkī, T. (1991). Ashbāh wa’l-naẓā’ir. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.Google Scholar
  28. Ibn Taymiyya, T. (1971). Dar’ al-ta‘āruṬ al-‘aql wa’l-naql. Riyad: Dār al-Kunūz al-Adabiyya.Google Scholar
  29. Olsen, S. (2015, December). Proceedings from: International summit on human gene editing: A global discussion. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK343651/.
  30. Al-Jazīrī, ‘A. (2003). Al-Fiqh ‘ala’l-madhāhib al-arba‘a. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.Google Scholar
  31. Kamali, M. (2011). Principles of Islamic jurisprudence. Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society.Google Scholar
  32. Kang, X., He, W., Huang, Y., Yu, Q., Chen, Y., Gao, X., et al. (2016). Introducing precise genetic modifications into human 3PN embryos by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 33(5), 581–588.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0710-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lanphier, E., Urnov, F., Haecker, S. E., Werner, M., & Smolenski, J. (2015). Don’t edit the human germline. Nature, 519(7544). Retrieved from: https://www.nature.com/news/don-t-edit-the-human-germ-line-1.17111.
  34. Liang, P., Xu, Y., Zhang, X., Ding, C., Huang, R., Zhang, Z., et al. (2015). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human tripronuclear zygotes. Protein and Cell, 6(5), 363–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ma, H., Marti-Gutierrez, N., Park, S. W., Wu, J., Lee, Y., Suzuki, K., et al. (2017). Correction of a pathogenic gene mutation in human embryos. Nature, 548, 413–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Majma‘ al-Fiqh al-Islāmī al-Duwalī. (1988–2009). Qarārāt wa tawṣiyyāt majma‘ al-fiqh al-islāmī al-duwalī. n.p.: n.p.Google Scholar
  37. Al-Maẓhari, M. (2007). Al-Tafsīr al-Maẓharī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.Google Scholar
  38. Mursī, M. (2005). Al-Tarbiya al-islāmiyya uṣuluhā wa taṭawwuruhā fi’l-bilād al-‘arabiyya. Riyad: ‘Ālam al-Kutub.Google Scholar
  39. Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj, A. (n.d.). Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Beirut: Dār al-Āfāq al-Jadīda.Google Scholar
  40. Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj, A. (2008). Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.Google Scholar
  41. Al-Nasafi, ‘A. (2011). Tafsīr al-Nasafī. Beirut: Dār Ibn Kathīr.Google Scholar
  42. Nasim, A. (2012). Ethical issues of biotechnology and genetic engineering: An Islamic perspective. In Proceedings of 11 the IAS conference on biotechnology and genetic engineering for development in Islamic word. Morocco, Rabat, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  43. Pugh, J. (2014). Autonomy, natality and freedom: A liberal re-examination of Habermas in the enhancement debate. Bioethics, 29(3), 145–152.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12082/full.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Al-Qaḍ̣āt, S. (1990). Matā tunfakh al-rūḥ fi’l-janīn? Amman: Dār al-Furqān.Google Scholar
  45. Al-Qarāfī, S. (1994). Al-Dhakhīra. Beirut: Dār al-Gharb.Google Scholar
  46. Al-Qarāfī, S. (n.d.). Anwār al-burūq fī anwā‘ al-furūq. n.p.: n.p.Google Scholar
  47. Al-Qurṭubi, A. (2004). Tafsīr al-Qurṭubī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.Google Scholar
  48. Al-Rāzī, F. (2004). Mafātiḥ al-ghayb. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.Google Scholar
  49. Al-Shahīd, B. (n.d.). Al-Muḥīṭ al-burhānī. n.p.: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī.Google Scholar
  50. Al-Shāṭibī, I. (1997). Al-Muwāfaqāt. Cairo: Dār Ibn ‘Affān.Google Scholar
  51. Al-Shuhūd, ‘A. (n.d.). Al-Khulāṣa fī fiqh al-aqalliyāt. n.p.: n.p.Google Scholar
  52. Sparrow, R. (2014). Better living through chemistry? A reply to Savulescu and Persson on ‘Moral enhancement’. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 31(1), 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Al-Sulamī,‘I. (n.d.). Uṣūl al-fiqh alladhī lā yasi‘ al-faqīh jahluh. n.p.: n.p.Google Scholar
  54. Skovgaard-Petersen, J. (1995). Sex change in Cairo: Gender and Islamic law. Journal of the International Institute, 2(3). Retrieved from http://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jii/4750978.0002.302?view=text;rgn=main.
  55. Al-Ṭabarī, A. (2005). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.Google Scholar
  56. Al-Ṭaḥṭāwī, A. (n.d.). Ḥāshiyat ‘alā marāqī al-falāḥ sharḥ nūr al-īḍāḥ. Cairo: Būlāq.Google Scholar
  57. Al-Tirmidhī, A. (2009). Jāmi‘ al-Tirmidhī. Karachi: Altaf & Sons.Google Scholar
  58. Al-Tha‘ālibī, ‘A. (1996). Jawāhir al-ḥisān fī tafsīr al-qur’ān. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.Google Scholar
  59. Al-Tuwayjirī, Ḥ. (1991). Kitāb al-ru’ya. Riyad: Dār al-Liwā’.Google Scholar
  60. ‘Ulamā’ al-Su’ūdiyya. (2004). Al-Buḥūth al-‘ilmiyya. Riyad: Ri’āsat Idārāt al-Buḥūth al-‘Ilmiyya wa’l-Iftā’.Google Scholar
  61. Vendler, H. (1984). Wallace Stevens: Words chosen out of desire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Al-Zamakhsharī, A. (1977). Al-Kashshāf ‘an ḥaqā’iq al-tanzīl wa ‘uyūn al-aqāwīl fī wujūd al-ta’wīl. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.Google Scholar
  63. Al-Zarkashī, B. (2000). Al-Baḥr al-muḥīt fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.Google Scholar
  64. Zou, Q., Wang, X., Liu, Y., Ouyang, Z., Long, H., Wei, S., et al. (2015). Generation of gene-target dogs using CRISPR/Cas9 system. Journal of Molecular Cell Biology, 7(6), 580–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Al-Zuḥaylī, M. (2006). Al-Qawā’id al-fiqhiyya wa taṭbīqātuhā fi’l-madhāhib al-arba‘a. Damascus: Dār al-Fikr.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Independent ScholarUniversity of OxfordBoltonUK

Personalised recommendations