Beyond Good and Evil: Doing Ethics in the Clinic. A Lecture Celebrating 25 Years of the Philip Hallie Lecture, College of Letters, Wesleyan University, November 2, 2018
- 5 Downloads
Now here’s a good way to do concrete ethics: Don’t just tell stories interpreted in the old words of ethical theories. Show the intimate feelings of the storyteller, me!
After all, good and evil are as personal as love and hate. And that means bringing mama into it, her terror, the mortal fear that perhaps all Jews feel after what the Nazis did (Hallie 1997).
Hallie explains that his mother dreaded a planned trip to Germany, fearing for his safety, even in 1979. He quotes a letter to her “beloved and precious child” warning him of the peril. “Innocent blood was spilled there,” she wrote. And it wouldn’t matter, “because a hand-full of Christians helped some Jews, Jewish people are happy. Not so with God…”
Reflecting on those words, Hallie...
- Fins, J. J. (2017). Brain injury and the civil right we don’t think about. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/24/opinion/minimally-conscious-brain-civil-rights.html. Accessed 30 Jan 2019.
- Hallie, P. (1979). Lest innocent blood be shed. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
- Hallie, P. (1995). Camus’s hug. The American Scholar, 64(3), 428–435.Google Scholar
- Hallie, P. (1997). Tales of good and evil, help and harm. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- Wright, M. S., & Fins, J. J. (2016). Rehabilitation, education, and the integration of individuals with severe brain injury into civil society: Towards an expanded rights agenda in response to new insights from translational neuroethics and neuroscience. Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics, 16(2), 233–288.Google Scholar