Advertisement

Journal of Religion and Health

, Volume 58, Issue 2, pp 391–407 | Cite as

An Examination of Denomination-Level Efforts in Congregation Health Programming

  • Melissa BoppEmail author
  • Benjamin L. Webb
  • Scherezade K. Mama
  • Emily Hentz-Leister
Original Paper
  • 85 Downloads

Abstract

Large denominational faith-based organizations (FBOs, e.g., conferences, dioceses) have potential to impact population health, though current activities are largely unknown. This study examined how large denominational FBOs approach health promotion programming and relevant barriers and issues related to capacity. A self-report survey via email and mail collected responses from representatives of FBOs about their health programming. The sample (n = 154) was diverse and included Catholic, Presbyterian, and Lutheran traditions. The most common activities were inclusion of health-related topics at organizational events and the provision of educational resources. Working with FBOs at a macro-level has potential implications for population-level health improvements.

Keywords

Denomination Environment Health promotion Capacity 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to report.

References

  1. AME Health Commission. (2018). Health-E-AME: For your health and well-being. Retrieved January 4, 2018 from http://www.health-e-ame.com/commission.htm.
  2. Baruth, M., Wilcox, S., & Saunders, R. P. (2013). The role of pastor support in a faith-based health promotion intervention. Family & Community Health, 36, 204–214.  https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0b013e31828e6733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bopp, M., & Fallon, E. A. (2011). Individual and institutional influences on faith-based health and wellness programming. Health Education Research, 26, 1107–1119.  https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyr096.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bopp, M., & Fallon, E. A. (2013). Health and wellness programming in faith-based organizations: A description of a nationwide sample. Health Promotion Practice, 14, 122–131.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839912446478.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bopp, M., Webb, B. L., Baruth, M., & Peterson, J. A. (2014). Perceptions of denominational, doctrine and seminary school support for health and wellness in churches. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 2, 189–199.  https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v2i1.274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, M. K., Hudson, M. A., Resnicow, K., Blakeney, N., Paxton, A., & Baskin, M. (2007). Church-based health promotion interventions: Evidence and lessons learned. Annual Revews in Public Health, 28, 213–234.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dandridge, R. (2014). Faith community/parish nurse literature: Exciting interventions, unclear outcomes. Journal of Christian Nursing, 31, 100–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. DeHaven, M. J., Hunter, I. B., Wilder, L., Walton, J. W., & Berry, J. (2004). Health programs in faith-based organizations: Are they effective? American Journal of Public Health, 94, 1030–1036.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Duff, J. F., & Buckingham, W. W., 3rd. (2015). Strengthening of partnerships between the public sector and faith-based groups. Lancet, 386, 1786–1794.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60250-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hartford Institute for Religion Research. (2012). Fast facts about american religion. Retrieved December 22, 2017 from http://hirr.hartsem.edu/research/fastfacts/fast_facts.html.
  11. LCMS Health Ministry. (2018). Health ministry: Encouraging christ-centered wellness for church workers and laity. Retrieved January 4, 2018 from https://www.lcms.org/how-we-serve/mercy/health-ministry.
  12. Levin, J. (2014). Faith-based initiatives in health promotion: History, challenges, and current partnerships. American Journal of Health Promotion, 28(3), 139–141.  https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.130403-CIT-149.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Levin, J. (2016). Partnerships between the faith-based and medical sectors: Implications for preventive medicine and public health. Preventive Medicine Reports, 4, 344–350.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.07.009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. National Physical Activity Plan Alliance. (2016). National physical activity plan. Retrieved December 12, 2017 from http://www.physicalactivityplan.org/index.php.
  15. Pappas-Rogich, M., & King, M. (2014). Faith community nursing: Supporting healthy people 2020 initiatives. Journal of Christian Nursing, 31(4), 228–234.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Peterson, J., Atwood, J. R., & Yates, B. (2002). Key elements for church-based health promotion programs: Outcome-based literature review. Public Health Nursing, 19, 401–411.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Pew Research Center. (2008). U.S. religious landscape survey. Religious affiliation: Diverse and dynamic. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  18. Pew Research Center. (2014). U.S. religious landscape survey. Retrieved December 12, 2017 from http://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/.
  19. Southern Baptist Convention. (1992). Resolution on the autonomy of baptist churches and general. Retrieved December 12, 2017 from http://www.sbc.net/resolutions/279/resolution-on-the-autonomy-of-baptist-churches-and-general.
  20. UMC Health Ministry Network. (2017). Health ministry for united methodist clergy and congregations. Concepts of health, healing and wholeness. Retrieved December 12, 2017 from https://www.wespath.org/assets/1/7/4380.pdf.
  21. United Methodist Church. (2018). U.S. health programs. Retrieved January 4, 2018 from https://www.umcmission.org/Explore-Our-Work/Global-Health/us-health-program.
  22. U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2017). Center for faith-based and neighborhood partnerships. Retrieved December 12, 2017 from https://www.usda.gov/our-agency/staff-offices/center-faith-based-and-neighborhood-partnerships.
  23. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS). (2012). Healthy people 2020. Retrieved December 22, 2017 from http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/default.aspx.
  24. Webb, B., Bopp, M., & Fallon, E. A. (2013). A qualitative study of faith leaders’ perceptions of health and wellness. Journal of Religion and Health, 52(1), 235–246.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-011-9476-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilcox, S., Laken, M., Anderson, T., Bopp, M., Bryant, D., Carter, R., et al. (2007a). The health-e-AME faith-based physical activity initiative: Description and baseline findings. Health Promotion Practice, 8, 69–78.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839905278902.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Wilcox, S., Laken, M., Bopp, M., Gethers, O., Huang, P., McClorin, L., et al. (2007b). Increasing physical activity among church members: Community-based participatory research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32, 131–138.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.10.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wilcox, S., Laken, M., Parrott, A. W., Condrasky, M., Saunders, R., Addy, C. L., et al. (2010). The faith, activity, and nutrition (FAN) program: Design of a participatory research intervention to increase physical activity and improve dietary habits in African American churches. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 31, 323–335.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2010.03.011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Wilcox, S., Parrott, A., Baruth, M., Laken, M., Condrasky, M., Saunders, R., et al. (2013). The Faith, Activity, and Nutrition program: A randomized controlled trial in African-American churches. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 44, 122–131.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.062.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Zahner, S. J., & Corrado, S. M. (2004). Local health department partnerships with faith-based organizations. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 10, 258–265.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Zech, C. (2003). Understanding denominational structures: Churches as franchise organizations. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 10, 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of KinesiologyPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Applied HealthSouthern Illinois University at EdwardsvilleEdwardsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations