Advertisement

Medical Students’ (Dis)comfort with Assessing Religious and Spiritual Needs in a Standardized Patient Encounter

  • Cindy Schmidt
  • Loes Nauta
  • Melissa Patterson
  • Adam Ellis
Original Paper
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

Most patients want to discuss their religious and spiritual concerns, yet few physicians discuss it. First-year medical students (n = 92) interviewed a standardized patient experiencing spiritual distress. There was a significant difference among the students’ reasoning for their (dis)comfort and (mis)matching religion with their patient (X2 = 21.0831, p < .05). Most students whose religion matched their patient felt comfortable because of having this in common with their patient. Most students whose religion did not match that of their patient ascribed their comfort to their religious belief to be open and accepting. Discomfort may stem from more individual factors than a (mis)match in religion, as most of the students reported feeling comfortable.

Keywords

Spiritual concern Religious diversity Standardized patient Medical education 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Clinical Skills Simulation Center at the American University of the Caribbean School of Medicine for their assistance with delivering this curriculum: Alyssa van den Bosch, Fallon Peterson, and all of the standardized patients. Teresa Boese, DNP, provided substantive commentary in her review of this manuscript. IRB: The American University of the Caribbean School of Medicine IRB approved the study as exempt from human subjects review due to the use of routine evaluation data for study # 2015-005 on November 12, 2015. The IRB waived written informed consent due to the sensitizing experience curriculum design along with the research procedure used permitting students to refrain from providing their responses to the researchers, the anonymity of their responses, and the absence of observers to note their decision to provide or withhold their responses.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Balboni, M., & Peteet, J. (Eds.). (2017). Spirituality and religion within the culture of medicine: From evidence to practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barrows, H. S. (1993). An overview of the uses of standardized patients for teaching and evaluating clinical skills. Academic Medicine-Philadelphia-, 68, 443–443.Google Scholar
  3. Bensing, J. (2000). Bridging the gap: The separate worlds of evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine. Patient Education and Counseling, 39(1), 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borneman, T., Ferrell, B., & Puchalski, C. M. (2010). Evaluation of the FICA tool for spiritual assessment. Journal of Pain Symptom Management, 40, 163–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.12.019.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Chi Square Test Calculator. (n.d.). Social science statistics. Retrieved July 28, 2017 from www.socscistatistics.com.
  6. Cohen, R., Bavishi, C., & Rozanski, A. (2016). Purpose in life and its relationship to all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events: A meta-analysis. Psychosomatic Medicine, 78(2), 122–133.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000274.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Echterhoff, G., Higgins, E. T., & Levine, J. M. (2009). Shared reality: Experiencing commonality with others’ inner states about the world. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(5), 496–521.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Ehman, J. W., Ott, B. B., Short, T. H., Ciampa, R. C., & Hansen-Flaschen, J. (1999). Do patients want physicians to inquire about their spiritual or religious beliefs if they become gravely ill? Archives of Internal Medicine, 159, 1803–1806.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.159.15.1803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elder, N. C., & Miller, W. L. (1995). Reading and evaluating qualitative research studies. The Journal of Family Practice, 41(3), 279–285.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Ernecoff, N. C., Curlin, F. A., Buddadhumaruk, P., & White, D. B. (2015). Health care professionals’ responses to religious or spiritual statements by surrogate decision makers during goals-of-care discussion. JAMA Internal Medicine, 175, 1662–1669.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4124.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Hall, W. J., Chapman, K. M., Lee, K. M., Merino, Y. M., Thomas, T. W., Payne, B., et al. (2015). Implicit racial/ethnic bias among health care professionals and its influence on health care outcomes: A systematic review. American Journal of Public Health, 105(12), 60–76.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jim, H. S. L., Pustejovsky, J. E., Park, C. L., Danhauer, S. C., Sherman, A. C., Fitchett, G., et al. (2015). Religion, spirituality, and physical health in cancer patients: A meta-analysis. Cancer, 121(21), 3760–3768.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29353.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Koenig, H. G., King, D. E., & Carson, V. B. (2012). Handbook of religion and health (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Ledford, C. J., Seehusen, D. A., Canzona, M. R., & Cafferty, L. A. (2014). Using a teaching OSCE to prompt learners to engage with patients who talk about religion and/or spirituality. Academic Medicine, 89(1), 60–65.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000062.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Li, S., Stampfer, M. J., Williams, D. R., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2016). Association of religious service attendance with mortality among women. JAMA Psychiatry, 73(8), 845–851.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1615.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Markman, A. G., & Gentner, D. (1996). Commonalities and differences in similarity comparisons. Memory and Cognition, 24(2), 235–249.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Mead, N., Bower, P., & Hann, M. (2002). The impact of general practitioners’ patientcentredness on patients’ post-consultation satisfaction and enablement. Social Science Medicine, 55, 283–299.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Miller, W. L., & Crabtree, B. F. (1994). Clinical Research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 340–352). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Puchalski, C., & Romer, A. L. (2000). Taking a spiritual history allows clinicians to understand patients more fully. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 3, 129–137.  https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2000.3.129.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmidt, C. A., Patterson, M. A., Ellis, A. M., & Nauta, H. L. (2017). Religious and spiritual assessment: A standardized patient curriculum intervention. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 13(7), 314–320.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2017.05.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Silverman, J., Kurtz, S., & Draper, J. (2005). Skills for communicating with patients (2nd ed.). Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Tacca, M. C. (2011). Commonalities between perception and cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 358.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00358.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Tun, J. K., Alinier, G., Tang, J., & Kneebone, R. L. (2015). Redefining simulation fidelity for healthcare education. Simulation & Gaming, 46(2), 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Villagran, M. M., MacArthur, B. L., Lee, L. E., Ledford, C. J. W., & Canzona, M. R. (2017). Physicians’ religious topic avoidance during clinical interactions. Behavioral Sciences, 7(2), 30.  https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7020030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zandbelt, L. C., Smets, E. M. A., Oort, F. J., Godfried, M. H., & de Haes, H. C. J. M. (2007). Medical specialists’ patient-centered communication and patient-reported outcomes. Medical Care, 45, 330–339.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000250482.07970.5f.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Medical EducationKansas City University of Medicine and BiosciencesKansas CityUSA
  2. 2.Clinical Skills Simulation Center, Behavioral and Clinical MedicineAmerican University of the CaribbeanCupecoySt. Maarten
  3. 3.Department of Family MedicineSt. John HospitalDetroitUSA
  4. 4.Department of AnesthesiologyIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations