Religion, Nonreligion, and Deviance: Comparing Faith’s and Family’s Relative Strength in Promoting Social Conformity
The view that religion, as a source of moral guidance and social support, can function to prevent or protect individuals, especially children and adolescents, from a range of deviant and delinquent behaviors is largely (but not completely) born out in the literature. In nations with strong religious identities such as the USA, there is a normative expectation that adolescents who identify with religion are less likely to engage in deviant behavior than those who claim no religion. The present study explores this issue using data from over 10,000 American middle school and high school youth to examine the relationship between religion, nonreligion, and various forms of deviance. Results indicate that youth who identify with a religious (rather than nonreligious) label are not less likely to be involved in deviant acts after controlling for protective factors. The effects from some of these protective factors are significant and stronger than the effects from religion.
KeywordsReligion Nonreligion Atheism Deviance Adolescence
The data used in this research were collected by the University of Delaware Center for Drug and Health Studies as part of a study supported by the Delaware Health Fund and by the Division of Substance Abuse and Mental Health, Delaware Health and Social Services. The authors wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
DeCamp and Smith declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights Statement
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (2015). Constructions of deviance: Social power, context, and interaction (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
- Beit-Hallahmi, B. (2010). Morality and immorality among the irreligious. In P. Zuckerman (Ed.), Atheism and secularity. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Beit-Hallahmi, B. (2015). Psychological perspectives on religion and religiosity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Beit-Hallahmi, B., & Argyle, M. (1997). The psychology of religious behavior, belief and experience. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ellis, L. (2002). Denominational differences in self-reported delinquency. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 35(3), 185–198.Google Scholar
- Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
- Manning, C. (2010). Atheism, secularity, the family, and children. In P. Zuckerman (Ed.), Atheism and secularity. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Manning, C. (2015). Losing our religion: How unaffiliated parent are raising their children. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- McClure, R. F., & Loden, M. (1982). Religious activity, denomination membership and life satisfaction. Psychology: Quarterly Journal of Human Behavior, 9(4), 12–17.Google Scholar
- Regnerus, M. D. (2008). Living up to expectations: How religion alters the delinquent behavior of low-risk adolescents. Baylor ISR Report. http://www.baylor.edu/content/services/document.php/25902.pdf.
- Roberts, K. A. (2004). Religion in sociological perspective (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.Google Scholar
- Stark, R., & Bainbridge, W. S. (1996). Religion, crime, and social control. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Wuthnow, R. (1998). The encyclopedia of politics and religion. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
- Zimmerman, K. J., Smith, J. M., Simonson, K., & Myers, B. W. (2015). Familial relationship outcomes of coming out as an atheist. Secularism and Nonreligion, 4(4), 1–13.Google Scholar
- Zuckerman, P. (2013). Atheism and societal health. In S. Bullivant & M. Ruse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of atheism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar