Advertisement

Journal of Religion and Health

, Volume 58, Issue 6, pp 2288–2297 | Cite as

Religious Commitment and Well-Being in College Students: Examining Conditional Indirect Effects of Meaning in Life

  • Kaiser Ahmad DarEmail author
  • Naved Iqbal
Original Paper
  • 242 Downloads

Abstract

There is systematic and quantitative evidence that religious commitment is associated with indicators of well-being, such as positive emotions and moods, absence of negative emotions, and satisfaction with life; however, researchers remain far from a consensus regarding which mechanisms may account for these observed relationships. Although religious commitment influences well-being through many different mechanisms, meaning in life is probably the predominant one. Thus, we examined the bidimensional conceptualization of meaning in life as a potential mechanism between religious commitment and well-being. The study was cross-sectional in nature. Survey data were collected from 92 college students, aged 17–21. A battery of self-report measures was used for tapping religious commitment, well-being, and meaning in life. Even though presence of meaning, search for meaning, religious commitment, and well-being correlated moderately with each other, presence of meaning carried a substantial proportion of variance in predicting well-being for girls/women. This study suggests that religious commitment influences a person’s sense of meaning in life, which, in turn, influences her/his well-being. And, we hope that these results encourage professionals to explore with their clients the fundamental questions of meaning and purpose in life.

Keywords

Religious commitment Presence of meaning Search for meaning Well-being 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank late Afroza Begum, the principle investigator’s wife, for her invaluable assistance with this project. Thanks are also due to those who kindly volunteered to participate in the present study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict interests

References

  1. Aiken, L., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chamberlain, K., & Zika, S. (1988). Religiosity, life meaning, and wellbeing: Some relationships in a sample of women. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,27, 411–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist,55, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest,5, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diener, E., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (1997). Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology,24, 25–41.Google Scholar
  8. Diener, E., Tay, L., & Myers, D. (2011). The religion paradox: If religion makes people happy, why are so many dropping out? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,101, 1278–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frankl, V. E. (1963). Man’s search for meaning: An introduction to logo-therapy. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
  10. Frazier, P. A., Oishi, S., & Steger, M. (2003). Assessing optimal human functioning. In B. Walsh (Ed.), Counseling psychology and optimal human functioning (pp. 251–278). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Freud, S. (1961). The future of an illusion. (J. Strachey, Trans.) New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  12. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hill, P. C., & Hood, R. W., Jr. (Eds.). (1999). Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kennedy, J. E., & Kanthamani, H. (1995). Empirical support for a model of well-being, meaning in life, importance of religion, and transcendent experiences. http://jeksite.org/research/path.pdf.
  16. Miller, A. S., & Stark, R. (2002). Gender and religiousness: Can socialization explanations be saved? American Journal of Sociology,107, 1399–1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ng, K.-Y., Ang, S., & Chan, K.-Y. (2008). Personality and leader effectiveness: A moderated mediation model of leadership self-efficacy, job demands, and job autonomy. Journal of Applied Psychology,93, 733–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGrawHill.Google Scholar
  19. Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  20. Pargament, K. I., & Park, C. L. (1997). In times of stress: The religion-coping connection. In B. Spilka & D. N. McIntosh (Eds.), The psychology of religion: Theoretical approaches (pp. 43–53). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  21. Park, C. L. (2005). Religion and meaning. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 295–314). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  22. Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative and graphical strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods,16, 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research,42, 185–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,69, 719–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry,9, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shek, D. T. L. (1992). Meaning in life and psychological well-being: An empirical study using the Chinese version of the Purpose in Life Questionnaire. The Journal of Genetic Psychology,153, 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Steger, M. F. (2012). Experiencing meaning in life: Optimal functioning at the nexus of well being, psychopathology and spirituality. In P. T. P. Wong & P. S. Fry (Eds.), The human quest for meaning (2nd ed., pp. 165–184). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Steger, M. F., & Frazier, P. (2005). Meaning in life: One link in the chain from religion to wellbeing. Journal of Counseling Psychology,52, 574–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The Meaning in Life Questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology,53, 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Steger, M. F., Kashdan, T. B., Sullivan, B. A., & Lorentz, D. (2008). Understanding the search for meaning in life: Personality, cognitive style, and the dynamic between seeking and experiencing meaning. Journal of Personality,76, 199–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Steger, M. F., Oishi, S., & Kashdan, T. B. (2009). Meaning in life across the life span: Levels and correlates of meaning in life from emerging adulthood to older adulthood. The Journal of Positive Psychology,4, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., Weich, S., et al. (2007). The Warwick-Edimburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes,5, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Veenhoven, R. (2008). Sociological theories of subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (p. 4461). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  34. Wong, P. T. P., & Fry, S. P. (Eds.). (1998). The human quest for meaning: A handbook of psychological research and clinical applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  35. Worthington, E. L., Jr. (1988). Understanding the values of religious clients: A model and its application to counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology,35, 166–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Worthington, E. L., Jr., Wade, N. G., Hight, T. L., Ripley, J. S., McCullough, M., Berry, J. W., et al. (2003). The Religious Commitment Inventory-10: Development, refinement, and validation of a brief scale for research and counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology,50, 84–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yalom, I. D. (1980). Existential psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyGovernment Degree CollegeBaramullaIndia
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyJamia Millia IslamiaNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations