Advertisement

Journal of Religion and Health

, Volume 58, Issue 1, pp 53–63 | Cite as

Lived Religion as Reproductive Decision-Making Resource Among Romanian Women Who Use Abortion as Contraception

  • Cristina A. PopEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

This article draws upon qualitative ethnographic data collected between 2005 and 2013 in southern Romania among women who have been consistently using abortion as a contraceptive method. It particularly considers the role that lived religion might have played in some individuals’ strategies to render abortion a justifiable practice. Over the last seven decades, Romanian women’s experiences of abortion have often been at odds with both secular and religious regulations. This study shifts the perspective from the biopolitics and the bioethics of abortion toward women’s own reproductive decision-making strategies in a context of enduring traditional patriarchy. It explores the fluid and pragmatic ways in which some Romanians use the notions of “God’s will,” “sin,” “redemption,” “afterlife,” and “Godparenting” to redefine abortion as a partially disembodied reproductive event. As a reproductive decision-making resource, lived religion empowers women to navigate the lived complexities of conception and contraception.

Keywords

Abortion as contraception Lived religion Reproductive decision-making Romania 

References

  1. Anton, L. (2009). On memory work in post-communist Europe: A case study on Romania’s ways of remembering its pronatalist past. Anthropological Journal of European Cultures, 18(2), 106–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Băban, A. (1999). From abortion to contraception: Romanian experience. In H. P. David (Ed.), From abortion to contraception: Transitions in postsocialist societies in central and eastern Europe (pp. 191–222). New York: Greenwood Publisher.Google Scholar
  3. Băban, A. (2000). Women's sexuality and reproductive behavior in post-ceausescu Romania: A psychological approach. In S. Gal & G. Kligman (Eds.), Reproducing gender: Politics, publics and everyday life after socialism. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Băban, A. (2006). Women’s health and the politics of reproduction. In M. Mesner, H. Niederkofler, & G. Wolfgruber (Eds.), The policies of reproduction at the turn of the 21st century; The cases of Finland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Austria, and the US (pp. 129–144). Vienna: Studien Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. BOR. (2005). Avortul. http://patriarhia.ro/avortul-78.html. Accessed 24 May 2017.
  6. Braam, T., & Hessini, L. (2004). The power dynamics perpetuating unsafe abortion in Africa: A feminist perspective. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 8(1), 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradatan, C., & Firebaugh, G. (2007). History, population policies, and fertility decline in eastern Europe: A case study. Journal of Family History, 32(2), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, J. (2014). Factors related to domestic violence in Asia: The conflict between culture and patriarchy. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 24(7), 828–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buckley, T., & Gottlieb, A. (Eds.). (1988). Blood magic. The anthropology of menstruation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. David, H. P. (Ed.). (1999). From abortion to contraception: Transitions in postsocialist societies in central and eastern Europe. New York: Greenwood Publisher.Google Scholar
  11. David, H., & Bǎban, A. (1996). Women’s health and reproductive rights: Romanian experience. Patient Education and Counseling, 28, 235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Defago, M. A. P., & Faundes, J. M. M. (2014). Conservative litigation against sexual and reproductive health policies in Argentina. Reproductive Health Matters, 22(44), 82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Durandin, C., & Petre, Z. (2010). Romania since 1989., Boulder: East European Monographs New York: Distributed by Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Einarsdottir, J. (2000). Tired of weeping: Child death and mourning among Papel mothers in Guinea-Bissau. Stockholm: Department of Social Anthropology, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  16. Einarsdottir, J. (2009). Emotional experts: Parents’ views on end-of-life decisions for preterm infants in Iceland. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 23(1), 34–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Erdman, J. (2014). Procedural abortion rights: Ireland and the European Court of Human Rights. Reproductive Health Matters, 22(44), 22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gheorghe, D. (2011). “Cum a ajuns Româniasǎ aibǎ 22 de milioane de avorturi?”, România Liberǎ, February 21. http://www.romanialibera.ro/exclusiv-rl/reportaj/cum-a-ajuns-romania-sa-aiba-22-milioane-de-avorturi-217321.html#top_articol. Last accessed August 14, 2015.
  19. Grimes, D., Benson, J., Singh, S., Romero, M., Ganatra, B., Okonofua, F., et al. (2006). Unsafe abortion: The preventable pandemic. The Lancet, 368(9550), 1908–1919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Halpern, J., Kaser, K., & Wagner, R. (1996). Patriarchy in the Balkans: Temporal and cross-cultural approaches. The History of the Family, 1(4), 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hann, C., & Goltz, H. (Eds.). (2010). Eastern Christians in anthropological perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  22. Iepan, F. (2005). The children of the decree. Documentary. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgZJ-IV8Et0. Last accessed August 14, 2015.
  23. INSSE. (2011). Recensămîntul populaţiei şi al locuinţelor. http://www.recensamantromania.ro/noutati/volumul-ii-populatia-stabila-rezidenta-structura-etnica-si-confesionala/. Last accessed August 14, 2015.
  24. Jinga, L., Doboş, C., Soare, F., & Roman, C. (2011). Politica pro-natalistǎ a regimului Ceauşescu (Vol. I, II). Iaşi: Polirom.Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, B., Horga, M., & Peter, F. (2004). A strategic assessment of abortion and contraception in Romania. Reproductive Health Matters, 12(24), 184–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keil, T., & Andreescu, V. (1999). Fertility policy in Ceauşescu’s Romania. Journal of Family History, 24(4), 478–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kligman, G. (1995). Political demography in Romania. In F. Ginsburg & R. Rapp (Eds.), Conceiving the new world order: The global politics of reproduction. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kligman, G. (1998). The politics of duplicity: Controlling reproduction in Ceausescu’s Romania. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  29. Marian, S. F. (2009)[1892]. Naşterea la români. Seculum.Google Scholar
  30. McGuire, M. (2008). Lived religion: Faith and practice in everyday life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miroiu, M. (2010). ‘Not the right moment!’ Women and the politics of endless delay in Romania. Women’s History Review, 19(4), 575–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Miroiu, M., & Dragomir, O. (Eds.). (2010). Naşterea. Istorii trăite. Iaşi: Polirom.Google Scholar
  33. Mishtal, J. (2015). Politics of morality: The church, the state, and reproductive rights in postsocialist Poland. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Orsi, R. (1997). Everyday miracles: The study of lived religion. In D. Hall (Ed.), Lived religion in America. Toward a history of practice: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Pop, C. (2015). Cervical cancer narratives: Invoking ‘God’s will’ to re-appropriate reproductive rights in present-day Romania. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 17(1), 48–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pop, C. (2016). Locating purity within corruption rumors: narratives of HPV vaccination refusal in a peri-urban community of Southern Romania. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 30(4), 563–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pope, C., & Mays, N. (Eds.). (2000). Qualitative research in health care. London: British Medical Journal Books.Google Scholar
  38. Rivkin-Fish, M. (2005). Women’s health in post-Soviet Russia: The politics of intervention. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Roman, D. (2001). Gendering eastern Europe: Pre-feminism, prejudice and east–west dialogues in post-communist Romania. Women’s Studies International Forum, 24(1), 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roman, D. (2003). Fragmented identities: Popular culture, sex, and everyday life in postcommunist Romania. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  41. Sasson, V., & Law, J. M. (2009). Imagining the fetus: The unborn in myth, religion, and culture. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Scheper-Hughes, N. (1992). Death without weeping: The violence of everyday life in Brazil. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  43. Scheper-Hughes, N., & Lock, M. (1987). The mindful body: A prolegomenon to future work in medical anthropology. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, New Series, 1(1), 6–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sedgh, G., Henshaw, S., Singh, S., Bankole, A., & Drescher, J. (2007). Legal abortion worldwide: Incidence and recent trends. International Family Planning Perspectives, 33(3), 106–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Şerbǎnescu, F., Morris, L., Stupp, P., & Stǎnescu, A. (1995). The impact of recent policy changes on fertility, abortion, and contraceptive use in Romania. Studies in Family Planning, 26(2), 76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stan, L., & Turcescu, L. (2005). Religion, politics and sexuality in Romania. Europe-Asia Studies, 57(2), 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stan, L., & Turcescu, L. (2007). Religion and politics in post-communist Romania. Oxford; NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stone, L. (2006). Kinship and gender: An introduction. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyMontana State UniversityBozemanUSA

Personalised recommendations