Advertisement

Journal of Religion and Health

, Volume 56, Issue 2, pp 649–668 | Cite as

Commitment to Celibacy in German Catholic Priests: Its Relation to Religious Practices, Psychosomatic Health and Psychosocial Resources

  • Klaus Baumann
  • Christoph Jacobs
  • Eckhard Frick sj
  • Arndt Büssing
Original Paper

Abstract

We aimed to investigate Catholic priests’ commitment to celibacy and its relation to their religious practices, life and work satisfaction, and psychosomatic health. Results of our cross-sectional study of 2549 priests show that the majority finds living in celibacy helpful to minister more effectively. Nevertheless, a large proportion see it as a burden and would not choose celibate life again. Commitment to celibacy was predicted best by the frequency of religious practices (liturgy), work engagement and personal relation with God, explaining 39 % of variance. These resources are predictors for maintaining a celibate lifestyle and facilitate priests’ satisfaction with life and commitment to their ministry.

Keywords

Commitment to celibacy Catholic priests Spirituality Religious practices Health Social support 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to the supporting team, particularly Andreas Günther, Cécile Loetz and Jakob Müller for their gracious assistance.

Funding

This study was an investigator-initiated trial without any influence of Church authorities.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors are members of the respective universities; three of the authors are Catholic priests (EF, KB, CJ) working at universities as researchers. The authors disclose any financial or other competing interests.

Ethical Approval

All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All individuals who participated in this anonymously conducted cross-sectional study were informed about the purpose of the study, assured of confidentiality and their right to withdraw their participation at any time and asked to provide informed consent by signing a form included with but separate from the provided questionnaires. None of them received any form of incentives.

References

  1. Anderson, J. (2007). The contest of moralities: Negotiating compulsory celibacy and sexual intimacy in the Roman Catholic priesthood. The Australian Journal of Anthropology, 18, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumann, K. (2002). “Priesterliche Identitätszustände”……. auf dem Weg, wie Christus gesinnt zu werden. In R. Marx & P. Schallenberg (Eds.), Wir haben Christi Sinn. Heilige als Vorbilder priesterlicher Spiritualität (pp. 163–181). Paderborn: Bonifatius.Google Scholar
  3. Baumann, K. (2010) “Wer es fassen kann”. Ehelose Keuschheit um des Himmelreiches willen und Fragen der Formation. Ordenskorrespondenz, 51, H3, 285–295.Google Scholar
  4. Bolby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Büssing, A., Frick, E., Jacobs, C., & Baumann, K. (2016). Health and life satisfaction of Roman Catholic Pastoral Workers: Private prayer has a greater impact than public prayer. Pastoral Psychology, 65(1), 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Büssing, A., Günther, A., Baumann, K., Frick, E., & Jacobs, C. (2013). Spiritual dryness as a measure of a specific spiritual crisis in Catholic priests: Associations with symptoms of burnout and distress. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. doi: 10.1155/2013/246797.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 386–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Daly, B. (2010). Priestly celibacy. The obligations of continence and celibacy for priests. Compass (10369686), 44, 20–33.Google Scholar
  9. Derogatis, L. R. (2000). BSI 18, Brief Symptom Inventory 18: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual. Minneapolis: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar
  10. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personal Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Franke, G., Ankerhold, A., Haase, M., Jäger, S., Tögel, C., Ulrich, C., et al. (2011). Der Einsatz des Brief Symptom Inventory 18 (BSI-18) BEI Psychotherapiepatienten. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 61, 82–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Frawley-O’Dea, M. G., & Goldner, V. (2007). Predatory priests, silenced victims, the sexual abuse crisis and the Catholic Church. Mahwah, NJ: The Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Frick, E., Büssing, A., Baumann, K., Weig, W., & Jacobs, C. (2016). Do self-efficacy expectation and spirituality provide a buffer against stress-associated impairment of health? A comprehensive analysis of the German Pastoral Ministry Study. Journal of Religion and Health, 55, 448–468.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fydrich, F., Sommer, G., Tydecks, S., & Brähler, E. (2009). Fragebogen zur sozialen Unterstützung (F-SozU): Normierung der Kurzform (K-14). Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie, 18, 43–48.Google Scholar
  15. Garhammer, E. (2011). Zölibat zwischen Charisma und Zwang. Würzburg: Echter.Google Scholar
  16. Gautier, M. L., Perl, P. M., Fichter, & Stephen, J. (2012). Same call, different men: The evolution of the priesthood since Vatican II. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
  17. Greeley, A. M. (1972). The Catholic Priest in the United States: Sociological investigations. Washington, DC: United States Catholic Conference.Google Scholar
  18. Hanson, K. R., Pfäfflin, F., & Lütz, M. (2004). Sexual abuse in the Catholic Church. Scientific and legal perspectives (Pontificia Academia Pro Vita). Vatican: Libreria Ed. Vaticana.Google Scholar
  19. Hinz, A., Schumacher, J., Albani, C., Schmid, G., & Brähler, E. (2006). Bevölkerungsrepräsentative Normierung der Skala zur Allgemeinen Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung. Diagnostika, 52, 26–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoge, D. R. (1994). Project future directions. Chicago: National Federation of Priests’ Councils.Google Scholar
  21. Hoge, D. R., & Wenger, J. E. (2003). Evolving visions of the priesthood: Changes from Vatican II to the turn of the new century. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
  22. Isacco, A., Sahker, E., Krinock, E., Sim, W., & Hamilton, D. (2015). How religious beliefs and practices influence the psychological health of Catholic Priests. American Journal of Men’s Health. doi: 10.1177/1557988314567325.Google Scholar
  23. John Paul II [Pope]. (1992). Apostolic exhortation “Pastores Dabo Vobis”. 25th Mar 1992, Rome.Google Scholar
  24. Joseph, E., Corveleyn, J., Luyten, P., & de Witte, H. (2010). Does commitment to celibacy lead to burnout or enhance engagement? A study among the Indian Catholic Clergy. European Journal of Mental Health, 5, 187–204. doi: 10.1556/EJMH.5.2010.2.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kramer, J., & Weig, W. (2016). Intimität und Sexualität bei katholischen Priestern in Deutschland – Ergebnisse aus der Seelsorgestudie. Sexuologie, 23, 5–16.Google Scholar
  26. Marcia, J. E. (1993). Ego identity. A handbook for psychosocial research. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Müller, W. (2010). Verschwiegene Wunden. Sexuellen Missbrauch in der katholischen Kirche erkennen und verhindern, München: Kösel.Google Scholar
  28. Müller, J. J., Loetz, C., Altenhofen, M., Frick, E., Buchheim, A., Baumann, K., et al. (2015). Bindung und psychosomatische Gesundheit bei katholischen Seelsorgenden. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 61, 370–383.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rossetti, S. J. (2011). Why priests are happy. A study of the psychological and spiritual health of priests. Notre Dame, IN: Ave Maria Press.Google Scholar
  30. Rossetti, S. J. (1996). A tragic grace. The Catholic Church and child sexual abuse. Collegeville, MN: The Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
  31. Rossetti, S. J. (2005). The joy of priesthood. Notre Dame, IN: Ave Maria Press.Google Scholar
  32. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., & van Rhenen, W. (2008). Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: Three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being? Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57, 173–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schmidtchen, G. (1973). Priester in Deutschland: Forschungsbericht über die im Auftrag der Deutschen Bischofskonferenz durchgeführte Umfrage unter allen Welt- und Ordenspriestern in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In Verbindung mit dem Institut für Demoskopie in Allensbach. Freiburg: Herder.Google Scholar
  35. Schneiders, S. M. (2001). Celibacy as charism. In Selling all: Commitment, consecrated celibacy, and community in catholic religious life, chapter 4 (pp. 117–159). New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  36. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor: NFER-NELSON.Google Scholar
  37. Sperry, L. (2003). Sex, Priestly Ministry, and the Church. Collegeville, MN.: Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
  38. Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Ulonska, H., & Rainer, M. J. (2007). Sexualisierte Gewalt im Schutz von Kirchenmauern. Berlin: Lit-Verlag.Google Scholar
  40. Underwood, L. G. (2011). The Daily Spiritual Experience Scale: Overview and results. Religions, 2, 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Underwood, L. G., & Teresi, J. A. (2002). The Daily Spiritual Experience Scale: Development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 22–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Versaldi, G. (1989). Priestly celibacy from the canonical and psychological points of view. In R. Latourelle (Ed.), Vatican II: Assessment and perspectives, 25 years after (pp. 131–157). Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  43. Winnicott, D. W. (1958). The capacity to be alone. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 39, 416–420.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Zulehner, P. M. (2001). Priester im Modernisierungsstress. Forschungsbericht der Studie Priester 2000. Ostfildern: Schwabenverlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Caritas Science and Christian Social Work, Faculty of TheologyAlbert-Ludwig UniversityFreiburgGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of Theology PaderbornPaderbornGermany
  3. 3.Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der IsarTechnische Universität MünchenMunichGermany
  4. 4.Quality of Life, Spirituality and Coping, Institute for Integrative MedicineWitten/Herdecke UniversityHerdeckeGermany

Personalised recommendations