Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality (BMMRS-P) in Clinical and Non-clinical Samples
- 384 Downloads
Despite Brazil’s high levels of religious involvement, there is a scarcity of validated religiousness/spirituality (R/S) measures in Portuguese, particularly multidimensional ones. This study presents the validation of the Portuguese version of the “Brief Multidimensional Measure in Religiousness and Spirituality” (BMMRS) within the Brazilian context. Inpatients (262) and caregivers (389) at two hospitals of Brazil answered the BMMRS, the DUREL-p, and a sociodemographic questionnaire. The internal and convergent validity and test–retest reliability for major dimensions were good. Discriminant validity was high (except for the Forgiveness dimension). The Portuguese version of the BMMRS is a reliable and valid instrument to assess multiple R/S dimensions in clinical and non-clinical samples.
KeywordsValidation studies Religion Spirituality Psychometric Measures
We would like to thank the psychology students Amanda Oliveira, Juliana Blaser, Lilith Gomes, Ludmila Miquelito, Nayara Benevenuto, Reilia Keith and Tiago Nunes who helped with data collection; Dr. José Vitor Vaz and MSc. Amanda Tostes for the translation and cultural adaptation of the BMMRS-p and Dr. Miguel Farias for his valuable contributions in the writing of this article. Cristiane Schumann received a master’s degree scholarship grant through “The National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)” in Brazil.
Conflicts of interest
We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.
- Idler, E., Musick, M., Elisson, C., George, L., Krause, N., Ory, M. G., et al. (2003). Measuring multiple dimensions of religion and spirituality for health research conceptual background and findings from the 1998 general social survey (Vol. 25). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Kimura, M., Oliveira, A. L., Mishima, L. S., & Underwood, L. G. (2012). Adaptação cultural e validação da Underwood’s Daily Spiritual Experience Scale. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem, 46(Esp), 99–106.Google Scholar
- Koenig, H. G., King, D. E., & Carson, V. B. (2012). Handobook of religion and health (2a ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Miarelli, A. V. T. C., & Silva, J. V. (2011). Adaptação cultural da brief multidimensional measure of religiousness/spirituality:1999. (Mestrado), Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí, Pouso Alegre.Google Scholar
- Mokuau, N., Hishinuma, E., & Nishimura, S. (2001). Validating a measure of religiousness/spirituality for Native Hawaiians. Pacif Health Diolog, 8(2), 407–416.Google Scholar
- Moreira-Almeida, A., Peres, M. F., Aloe, F., Neto, F. L., & Koenig, H. G. (2008). Versão em português da Escala de Religiosidade da Duke-Durel. Revista de Psiquiatria Clínica, 35(1), 31–32.Google Scholar
- Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
- Sheskin, D. J. (2011). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures (5th Edn.). Chapman and Hall: CRC.Google Scholar