Explaining Seemingly Paradoxical Consumer Experiences: Conjoining Weekly Road Rage and Church Attendance
- 223 Downloads
The purposes of the current study are threefold: Provide evidence that an extreme paradoxical group exists—people frequently attending church and exhibiting road rage, profile this group, and frame possible explanations for the seemingly paradoxical behaviors. This study employs data from a national (USA) lifestyle survey conducted by Market Facts with 3,350 American respondents. The major questions asked about church participation and road-rage behavior (“giving a finger” and “flashing headlights”). Nomologically, relevant activities include 3 items for church goers and 3 items for road-rage givers. Additionally, 14 items profiled the lifestyles of the unique paradoxical behavior segment. Utilizing cross-tabulation tables, property space analyses identify the double extreme (XX) group (18 people) and other 6 groups with a significant chi-square test, confirming the extreme group exists. Analyses of variance test results show that comparing nomologically relevant activities among the seven groups is all statistically significant, indicating the nomological validity is met. Overall, the XX group tends to have more males, be younger, and have a higher proportion of people working in sales. The profile of lifestyle analyses shows the XX group members have both high ambitions and expectations, might be very frustrated individuals, and equip with the adventurous and masculine traits related to aggression. The XX behavior group’s demographic and psychographic characteristics portray similar lifestyles that differ from other groups. Case-based analyses provide further contextual information of nuances to XX segment individuals. The limited energy theory, the Eagleman’s theory of unconscious mind, and justification theory help to explain why people conjointly go to church and commit road rage. Addressing chronic paradoxical behaviors provides implications for social de-marketing to reduce aggressive anti-social behavior such as road rage. Frequent church attendance may help make people more sensitive to their wrongdoings and gradually revise the anti-social behavior.
KeywordsParadoxical behavior Limited energy theory Unconscious mind Justification theory Road rage
- Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2005). Consumer culture theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. Journal of Behavior Research, 31(4), 868–882.Google Scholar
- Baumeister, R. F., Schmeichel, B. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Self-regulation and the executive function: The self as controlling agent. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Carpenter, R. (2000). Mapping the mind. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Eagleman, D. (2007). 10 Unsolved mysteries of the brain. Discover Magazine, July 31, 2007. Retrieved 02/15/2012 from http://teacherweb.com/TN/Hillwood/dAmbrosi/BrainMysteries.pdf.
- Eagleman, D. (2011). Incognito: The secret lives of the brain. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
- Evans, G. (August 15, 2005). Trend expert: Embrace paradoxes to meet consumer needs. Furniture/Today, 24.Google Scholar
- Gau, L. S., & Woodside, A. G. (2011). Living in paradox: Committing road rage and attending church most weeks. AMA Summer Educators’ Conference Proceedings 2011 (Vol. 22, pp. 185–192).Google Scholar
- Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. New York: Back Bay Books.Google Scholar
- Lazarsfeld, P., & Barton, A. (1965). Qualitative measurement in social science: Classification, typologies, and indices. In D. Lerner & H. D. Lasswell (Eds.), The policy sciences (pp. 155–192). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Steup, M. (2011). Epistemology. In E. N. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2011 Ed.). Retrieved 02/15/2012 from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/epistemology/.
- United States Census Bureau. (2013). U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/.
- Vest, J., W. Cohen and M. Tharp (1997), Road rage: Tailgating, giving the finger, outright violence—Americans grow more likely to take out their frustrations on other drivers. US News & World Report, June 2. Retrieved 02/17/2011 from http://www.drivers.com/article/169/.
- Waters, R. (2007). The power of paradox. Associations Now, January. Retrieved 02/17/2011 from http://www.asaecenter.org/Resources/ANowDetail.cfm?ItemNumber=24149.
- Wegner, D. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Wilson, T. (2002). Strangers to ourselves: Discovering the adaptive unconscious. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Woodhead, H. E. (2006). The power of paradox. Oakville, Ontario: Hasley Enterprises Worldwide Inc.Google Scholar
- Zaltman, G. (2003). How customers think. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar