Journal of Religion and Health

, Volume 51, Issue 2, pp 371–380 | Cite as

Proportion of US Congregations that have People Living with HIV

Original Paper

Abstract

Surveillance studies monitor the prevalence and incidence of HIV, and this information is used by policy makers to design prevention programs and facilitate care for people living with HIV (PLWHIV). Although most of these studies monitor the presence of PLWHIV in the general population or specific communities, some assess the presence of PLWHIV in organizations. One type of organization that has not been examined, yet could potentially play a large role in caring for PLWHIV, is the religious congregation. In this study, we estimate the proportion of US religious congregations that have PLWHIV and examine whether congregations that are in contact with populations with high HIV prevalence and incidence rates are more likely to have PLWHIV using data from a nationally representative sample of congregations and the 2000 Census. Over 10,000 congregations have PLWHIV, and congregations containing, open to, or located in areas with populations with high HIV prevalence and incidence rates are more likely to have them. This study offers new insight into the presence of HIV in the United States and provides information about which congregations may be amenable to serving as sites of HIV programs.

Keywords

Congregations HIV/AIDS Organizations Religion Surveillance 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The project was funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation (#0452269) as well as grants from the Lilly Endowment, Inc. (2006-1675-000), the Kellogg Foundation (P0118042), and the Louisville Institute (2005105). These grants supported the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data. Data collection was handled by the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago, and the data were cleaned at Duke University, Durham, NC. The authors would like to thank Kim Blankenship, Brad Fulton, and Steven Foy for their helpful comments on earlier versions of the manuscript.

References

  1. Bozzette, S. A., Berry, S. H., Duan, N., Frankel, M. R., Leibowitz, A. A., Lefkowitz, D., et al. (1998). The care of HIV-infected adults in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 339(26), 1897–1904.Google Scholar
  2. Buehler, J. W. (2008). Surveillance. In K. J. Rothman, S. Greenland, & T. L. Lash (Eds.), Modern epidemiology (3rd ed., pp. 459–480). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  3. US Census Bureau (2002). Census 2000 Summary File 3United States [Data file].Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, M. K., Hudson, M. A., Resnicow, K., Blakeney, N., Paxton, A., & Baskin, M. (2007). Church-based health promotion interventions: evidence and lessons learned. Annual Review of Public Health, 28, 213–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlin, J. B., Galati, J. C., & Royston, P. (2008). A new framework for managing and analyzing multiply imputed data in Stata. Stata Journal, 8(1), 49–67.Google Scholar
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2008). HIV prevalence estimates—United States, 2006. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 57(39), 1073–1076.Google Scholar
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). HIV/AIDS surveillance report, 2007, 19 Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/reports/.
  8. Chaves, M. (2004). Congregations in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chaves, M., & Anderson, S. L. (2008). Continuity and change in American congregations: introducing the second wave of the National Congregations Study. Sociology of Religion, 69(4), 415–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaves, M., & Anderson, S. L. (2009). National Congregations Study cumulative codebook for waves I and II (1998 and 2006–2007). Durham: Duke University, Sociology Department.Google Scholar
  11. Chaves, M., & Tsitsos, W. (2001). Congregations and social services: what they do, how they do it, and with whom. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(4), 660–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis, J. A., Smith, T. W., & Marsden, P. V. (2007). General Social Surveys, 1972–2006: cumulative codebook. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.Google Scholar
  13. Dean, H. D., Lansky, A., & Fleming, P. L. (2002). HIV surveillance methods for the incarcerated population. AIDS Education and Prevention, 14(5), 65–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeHaven, M. J., Hunter, I. B., Wilder, L., Walton, J. W., & Berry, J. (2004). Health programs in faith-based organizations: are they effective? American Journal of Public Health, 94(6), 1030–1036.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frenk, S. M., Anderson, S. L., Chaves, M., & Martin, N. (forthcoming). Assessing the validity of key informant reports about congregants’ demographic characteristics. Sociology of Religion.Google Scholar
  16. Hadaway, C. K., & Marler, P. L. (2005). How many Americans attend worship each week? An alternative approach to measurement. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44(3), 307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hall, H. I., Song, R., Rhodes, P., Prejean, J., An, Q., Lee, L. M., et al. (2008). Estimation of HIV incidence in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association, 300(5), 520–529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1999). AIDS stigma and contact with persons with AIDS: effects of direct and vicarious contact. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hernández, E. I., Burwell, R., & Smith, J. (2007). Answering the call: how Latino churches can respond to the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame, Institute for Latino Studies.Google Scholar
  20. Hicks, K. E., Allen, J. A., & Wright, E. M. (2005). Building holistic HIV/AIDS responses in African American urban faith communities: a qualitative, multiple case study analysis. Family & Community Health, 28(2), 184–205.Google Scholar
  21. Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured/Urban Institute. (2007). Health insurance coverage in the US, 2006. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved from http://facts.kff.org/chart.aspx?ch=477. 2007.
  22. Kennedy, P. (2008). A guide to econometrics (6th ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. King, G., & Zeng, L. (1999a). Logistic regression in rare events data. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Department of Government. Retrieved from http://GKing.Harvard.Edu.
  24. King, G., & Zeng, L. (1999b). Estimating absolute, relative, and attributable risks in case-control studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Department of Government. Retrieved from http://GKing.Harvard.Edu.
  25. Krieger, N., Chen, J. T., Waterman, P. D., Soobader, M., Subramanian, S. V., & Carson, R. (2002). Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter? The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. American Journal of Epidemiology, 156(5), 471–482.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Latkin, C. A., Tobin, K. E., & Gilbert, S. H. (2002). Shun or support: the role of religious behaviors and HIV-related health care among drug users in Baltimore, Maryland. AIDS and Behavior, 6(4), 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marsden, P. V., & Rohrer, L. H. (2001). Organizational and informant differences in the reliability of survey reports on organization size and age. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association meetings. Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  28. McBridge, D. C., McCoy, C. B., Chitwood, D. D., Inciardi, J. A., Hernandez, E. L., & Mutch, P. M. (1994). Religious institutions as sources of AIDS information for street injection drug users. Review of Religious Research, 35(4), 324–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McGrew, C. A., Dick, R. W., Schniedwind, K., & Kikas, P. (1993). Survey of NCAA institutions concerning HIV/AIDS policies and universal precautions. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 25(8), 917–921.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. McPherson, J. M. (1982). Hypernetwork sampling: duality and differentiation among voluntary organizations. Social Networks, 3(4), 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McPherson, J. M., & Rotolo, T. (1995). Measuring the composition of voluntary groups—a multitrait-multimethod analysis. Social Forces, 73(3), 1097–1115.Google Scholar
  32. McRoberts, O. (2003). Streets of glory: church and community in a black urban neighborhood. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Moore, R. D., & Chaisson, R. E. (1999). Natural history of HIV infection in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy. AIDS, 13(14), 1933–1942.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Palella, F. J., Delaney, K. M., Moorman, A. C., Loveless, M. O., Fuhrer, J., Satten, G. A., et al. (1998). Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. New England Journal of Medicine, 338(13), 853–860.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Royston, P. (2007). Multiple imputation of missing values: further update of ice, with an emphasis on interval censoring. Stata Journal, 7(4), 445–464.Google Scholar
  36. StataCorp. (2007). Stata Statistical Software: Release 10. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
  37. Tomz, M., King, G., & Zeng, L. (1999). RELOGIT: rare events logistic regression, Version 1.1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. Retrieved from http://gking.harvard.edu/.
  38. Trinitapoli, J., Ellison, C. G., & Boardman, J. D. (2009). US religious congregations and the sponsorship of health-related programs. Social Science & Medicine, 68(12), 2231–2239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Trubo, R. (2004). CDC initiative targets HIV research gaps in black and Hispanic communities. Journal of the American Medical Association, 292(21), 2563–2564.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Visser, M. J., Makin, J. D., & Lehobye, K. (2006). Stigmatizing attitudes of the community towards people living with HIV/AIDS. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 16(1), 42–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Winship, C., & Radbill, L. (1994). Sampling weights and regression analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 23(2), 230–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Departments of Sociology and ReligionDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  3. 3.Divinity School, Duke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations