Journal of Religion and Health

, Volume 50, Issue 4, pp 975–985 | Cite as

Examination of the Psychometric Properties of the Spiritual Fitness Assessment

  • Veronica A. Kassab
  • Douglas A. MacDonaldEmail author
Original Paper


Using a sample of 196 undergraduate students, the present study investigated the psychometric properties of the Spiritual Fitness Assessment, a measure of spiritual fitness designed for use by health and fitness professionals. Examination of inter-item consistency produced satisfactory alpha coefficients for the total test and its three subscales. Correlations of the SFA with measures of spirituality and spiritual well-being provide support for convergent validity. Significant positive correlations with a measure of self-esteem suggest that the test has satisfactory criterion validity. Correlations with age, sex, and a measure of social desirability indicate that the SFA is significantly, though only moderately, affected by demographic variables and motivated response tendencies. Factor analysis of the SFA items indicate that the test is factorially complex and subscales may need to be refined to better measure their intended constructs. Overall, the results of the study suggest that the test may be useful for evaluations of spiritual fitness. Further research with samples drawn from different populations is needed on the test to better establish its reliability and validity.


Spirituality Fitness Psychometric Measurement Evaluation 


  1. Fletcher, D. (2007b). An introduction to spiritual exercises for a healthier life. Faith and Fitness Magazine. Retrieved from
  2. Fletcher, D. (2007c). Measuring your spiritual fitness. Faith and Fitness Magazine. Retrieved from
  3. Fletcher, D. (nd). Spiritual fitness & health assessment. Retrieved September 2, 2009 from
  4. Friedman, H. L., & MacDonald, D. A. (Eds.). (2002). Approaches to transpersonal measurement and assessment. San Francisco, CA: Transpersonal Institute.Google Scholar
  5. MacDonald, D. A. (2000a). Spirituality: Description, measurement, and relation to the five factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 68(1), 153–197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. MacDonald, D. A. (2000b). The expressions of spirituality inventory: Test development, validation and scoring information (Unpublished test manual).Google Scholar
  7. Marinelli, R. D., & Plummer, O. K. (1999). Healthy aging: Beyond exercise. Activities, Adaptation, and Aging, 23(4), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Oman, D., & Thoresen, C. E. (2005). Do religion and spirituality influence health? In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 435–459). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  9. Paulhus, D. L. (1988). Assessing self-deception and impression management in self-reports: The balanced inventory of desirable responding. Version 6. University of British Columbia (unpublished manual).Google Scholar
  10. Robinson, J. P., & Shaver, P. R. (1973). Measures of social psychological attitudes (Revised edition ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  11. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Vella-Brodrick, D. A., & Allen, F. C. L. (1995). Development and psychometric validation of the mental, physical, and spiritual well-being scale. Psychological Reports, 77, 659–674.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Detroit MercyDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations