Advertisement

An Investigation of Sequencing Effects in Combining Cognitive Questioning and Mindful Acceptance

  • Rosita Borlimi
  • Gerhard Benetka
  • Gianni Brighetti
  • Gabriele Caselli
  • Elisabetta Caletti
  • Carolina A. Redaelli
  • Giovanni M. Ruggiero
  • Diego Sarracino
  • Sandra Sassaroli
Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Cognitive-behavioral treatments assume that the mechanisms of change depend on the assessment and questioning of biased beliefs. In contrast, recent developments have emphasized mindful acceptance interventions, in which clients allow thoughts to come and go without questioning them. In order to discuss therapeutic efficacy difference in emotional disorders, we explored the possible normalizing effects of cognitive questioning and mindful acceptance on sympathetic reactivity aroused by recall tasks. We compared the effects of different sequencing of cognitive questioning and mindful acceptance on emotional distress in two groups in which questioning either preceded (group 1) or followed (group 2) acceptance. Thirty-five non-clinical individuals (21 males, 14 females) randomly allocated to either group 1 or 2 participated in the experimental tasks (unpleasant recall, cognitive questioning, and metacognitive acceptance). Sympathetic reactivity levels were measured using galvanic skin response. Results showed that acceptance reduced sympathetic reactivity when compared to questioning. The best sequence was that in which questioning preceded acceptance. By interpreting sympathetic reactivity as a measure of emotional distress and experimental tasks as models for therapeutic approaches, this experiment suggests that acceptance is better than questioning in reducing emotional distress especially when cognitive questioning is followed by mindful acceptance.

Keywords

Acceptance Cognitive therapy Metacognition Questioning Sympathetic reactivity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Garbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck depression inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 77–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  4. Braithwaite, J. J., Watson, D. G., Jones, R., & Rowe, M. (2013). A guide for analysing electrodermal activity (EDA) & skin conductance responses (SCRs) for psychological experiments. Psychophysiology, 49, 1017–1034.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1606-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burns, A., O’Mahen, H., Baxter, H., Bennert, K., Wiles, N., Ramchandani, P., et al. (2013). A pilot randomised controlled trial of cognitive behavioural therapy for antenatal depression. BMC Psychiatry, 13, 33.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244x-13-33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Burns, M. K., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Boice, C. H. (2008). Best practices in intensive academic interventions. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 1151–1162). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, D. A., Beck, A. T., & Alford, B. A. (1999). Scientific foundations of cognitive theory and therapy of depression. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Cuijpers, P., Weitz, E., Twisk, J., Kuehner, C., Cristea, I., David, D., et al. (2014). Gender as predictor and moderator of outcome in cognitive behavior therapy and pharmacotherapy for adult depression: an “individual patient data” meta-analysis. Depression and Anxiety, 31(11), 941–951.  https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22328.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. DiGiuseppe, R., Doyle, K. A., Dryden, W., & Backx, W. (2014). A practioner’s guide to rational emotive behavior therapy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dobson, D. J. G. (2013a). In-session structure and collaborative empiricism. Cognitive Behavioral Practice, 20, 410–418.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2012.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dobson, D. J. G. (2013b). The effects of acceptance versus control contexts on avoidance of panic-related symptoms. Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychology, 34, 293–312.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2003.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellis, A. (1962). Reason And emotion in psychotherapy. Secaucus, NJ: The Citadel Press.Google Scholar
  13. Ellis, A., & Grieger, R. (Eds.). (1977). Handbook of rational emotive therapy. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (1993). Technical advances in behavioral psychotherapy of obsessive-compulsive disorders. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 60, 57–61.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000288680.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fonagy, P., & Bateman, A. W. (2006). Mechanisms of change in mentalization-based treatment of BPD. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 411–430.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20241.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gkika, S., & Wells, A. (2015). How to deal with negative thoughts? A preliminary comparison of detached mindfulness and thought evaluation in socially anxious individuals. Cognitive and Therapy Research, 39, 23–30.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-014-9637-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grant, A., Townend, M., Mulhern, R., & Short, N. (2010). Cognitive behavioural therapy in mental health care (2nd ed.). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gutiérrez, O., Luciano, C., Rodríguez-Valverde, M., & Fink, B. C. (2004). Comparison between an acceptance-based and a cognitive-control-based protocol for coping with pain. Behaviour Therapy, 35, 767–783.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7894(04)80019-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haaga, D. A., Dyck, M. J., & Ernst, D. (1991). Empirical status of cognitive theory of depression. Psychoogical Bullettin, 110(2), 215–236.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J., Bond, F., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes, and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(1), 1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  22. Hollon, S. D., Stewart, M. O., & Strunk, D. (2006). Enduring effects for cognitive behavior therapy in the treatment of depression and anxiety. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 285–315.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190044.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Just and Alloy. (1997). The response styles theory of depression: Tests and an extension of the theory. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106(2), 221–229.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kagan, J., & Snidman, N. (1999). Early childhood predictors of adult anxiety disorders. Biological Psychiatry, 46, 1536–1541.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00137-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kagan, J., Snidman, N., & Arcus, D. (1998). Childhood derivatives of high and low reactivity in infancy. Child Development, 69, 1483–1493.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06171.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee, H. J., & Turkel, J. E. (2013). Treatment of anxiety and comorbid cluster a personality disorders. In E. A. Storch & D. McKay (Eds.), Handbook of treating variants and complications in anxiety disorders (pp. 223–241). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Levitt, J. T., Brown, T. A., Orsillo, S. M., & Barlow, D. H. (2004). The effects of acceptance versus suppression of emotion on subjective and psychophysiological response to carbon dioxide challenge in patients with panic disorder. Behaviour Therapy, 35, 747–766.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7894(04)80018-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lo Verde, R., Sarracino, D., & Vigorelli, M. (2012). Therapeutic cycles and referential activity in the analysis of the therapeutic process. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 15(1), 22–31.  https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2012.99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meloni, F., & Gana, K. (2001). Wording effects in the Italian version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 8(4), 282–287.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meyer, T. J., Miller, M. L., Metzger, R. L., & Borkovec, T. D. (1990). Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behaviour Research Therapy, 28, 487–495.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(90)90135-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Mick, M. A., & Telch, M. J. (1998). Social anxiety and the history of behavioral inhibition in young adults. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 12, 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0887-6185(97)00046-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Molenaar, I., & Chiu, M. M. (2014). Dissecting sequences of regulation and cognition: statistical discourse analysis of primary school children’s collaborative learning. Metacognition and Learning, 9, 137–190.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9105-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Molina, S., & Borkovec, T. D. (1994). “The Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Psychometric properties and associated characteristics. In G. Davey & F. Tallis (Eds.), Worrying: Perspectives on theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 265–283). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Montague, M. (1992). The effects of cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction on the mathematical problem solving of middle school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 230–248.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949202500404.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Montague, M., & Dietz, S. (2009). Evaluating the evidence base for cognitive strategy instruction an mathematical problem solving. Exceptional Children, 75, 285–302.  https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290907500302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nolan, S. A., Roberts, J. E., & Gotlib, I. H. (1998). Neuroticism and ruminative response style as predictors of change in depressive symptomatology. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22, 445–455.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018769531641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Davis, C. G. (1999). ‘Thanks for sharing that’: Ruminators and their social support network. Journal Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 801–814.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Morrow, J. A. (1991). Prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Journal Personality and Social Psychology., 61, 115–121.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.1.115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Otte, C. (2011). Cognitive behavioral therapy in anxiety disorders: Current state of the evidence. Dialogues in Clinical Neurosciences., 13, 413–421.Google Scholar
  40. Palmieri, R., Gasparre, A., & Lanciano, T. (2007). Una misura disposizionale della ruminazione depressiva: la RRS di Nolen-Hoeksema e Morrow [A questionnaire to assess dispositional depressive rumination: Nolen-Hoeksema and Morrow’s RRS]. Psychofenia, 17, 15–33.Google Scholar
  41. Pedrabissi, L., & Santinello, M. (1989). STAI manual. Italian adaptation. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.Google Scholar
  42. Perrin, S., & Last, C. G. (1992). Do childhood anxiety measures measure anxiety? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 20, 567–578.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00911241.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Renaud, J., Dobson, K. S., & Drapeau, M. (2013). Cognitive therapy for depression: Coping style matters. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 14(1), 42–47.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14733145.2012.758754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Richards, J. C., & Bertram, S. (2000). Anxiety sensitivity, state and trait anxiety, and perception of change in sympathetic nervous system arousal. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 14, 413–427.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Rosenbaum, J. F., Biederman, J., Gersten, M., Hirschfeld-Becker, D. R., Meninger, S. R., Herman, J. B., et al. (1988). Behavioral inhibition in children of parents with panic disorder and agoraphobia: A control study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 45, 463–470.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800290083010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Roth, W. T., Doberenz, S., Dietel, A., Conrad, A., Mueller, A., Wollburg, E., et al. (2008). Sympathetic activation in broadly defined generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 42, 205–212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.12.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Shurick, A. A., Hamilton, J. R., Harris, L. T., Roy, A. K., Gross, J. J., & Phelps, E. A. (2012). Durable effects of cognitive restructuring on conditioned fear. Emotion, 12(6), 1393–1397.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029143. Epub 2012 Jul 9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Spielmans, G. I., Benish, S. G., Marin, C., Bowman, W. M., Menster, M., & Wheeler, A. J. (2013). Specificity of psychological treatments for bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder? A meta-analysis of direct comparisons. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(3), 460–469.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.01.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Sukhodolsky, D. G., Golub, A., & Cromwell, E. N. (2001). Development and validation of the anger rumination scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 689–700.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00171-9. (M. Baldetti, C. Bartolozzi, Trans. (2010). La validazione Italiana della Anger Rumination Scale. [dissertation/master’s thesis]. [Firenze (IT)]: Scuola Cognitiva di Firenze Post Graduate Cognitive Psychotherapy School).
  50. Wells, A. (2005). Detached mindfulness in cognitive therapy: A metacognitive analysis and ten techniques. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 23, 337–355.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14733145.2012.758754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wells, A. (2009). Metacognitive therapy for anxiety and depression. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosita Borlimi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gerhard Benetka
    • 3
  • Gianni Brighetti
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gabriele Caselli
    • 1
    • 4
  • Elisabetta Caletti
    • 5
  • Carolina A. Redaelli
    • 4
  • Giovanni M. Ruggiero
    • 1
    • 6
  • Diego Sarracino
    • 7
  • Sandra Sassaroli
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Sigmund Freud UniversityMilanItaly
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
  3. 3.Faculty of PsychologySigmund Freud UniversityViennaAustria
  4. 4.Post Graduate Cognitive Psychotherapy SchoolStudi CognitiviMilanItaly
  5. 5.Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore PoliclinicoUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
  6. 6.Psicoterapia Cognitiva e RicercaPost Graduate Cognitive Psychotherapy SchoolMilanItaly
  7. 7.Department of PsychologyMilano Bicocca UniversityMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations