A solution-focused approach to rational-emotive behavior therapy: toward a theoretical integration

Article

Abstract

A theoretical integration of rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) and solution-focused therapy is described. It is suggested that the integrative conceptualization underscores these models’ complementary aspects by addressing the limitations of each and enhancing their respective strengths. The clinical theory and process of the integrative model is explicated along with a case example. Directions for future theory building, research, and practice are considered.

Keywords:

REBT solution-focused therapy integration 

References

  1. Anderson H., Goolishian H. A., (1988). Human systems as linguistic systems: Preliminary and evolving ideas about the implications for clinical theoryFamily Process 27: 371–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck A. T., (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders International Universities Press New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Colaptino J., (1979). The relative value of empirical evidenceFamily Process 18: 427–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Shazer S., (1978). Brief hypnotherapy of two sexual dysfunctions: The Crystal Ball TechniqueAmerican Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 20: 203–208 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. de Shazer S., (1982). Patterns of brief family therapy: An ecosystemic approach. Guilford New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. de Shazer S., (1984). The death of resistanceFamily Process 23: 11–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Shazer S., (1985). Keys to solution in brief therapy Norton New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. de Shazer S., (1988). Investigating solutions in brief therapy Norton New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. de Shazer S., (1991). Putting difference to work Norton New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. de Shazer S., Berg I. K., Lipchik E., Nunnally E., Molnar E., Gingerich K., Weiner-Davis M., (1986). Brief therapy: Focused solution developmentFamily Process 25: 207–222 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellis A., (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy Lyle Stuart Secaucus, NJGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellis A., (1977). Rejoinder: Elegant and inelegant RET Counseling Psychologist 7: 73–82 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellis A., (1980). Rational-emotive therapy and cognitive-behavior therapy: Similarities and differencesCognitive Therapy and Research 4: 325–340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellis A., (1985). Overcoming resistance: Rational-emotive therapy with difficult clients Springer New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Ellis A., (1987). The evolution of rational-emotive therapy (RET) and cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) In Zeig J. K., (Ed.), The evolution of psychotherapy Brunner/Mazel New York (pp. 107–125)Google Scholar
  16. Ellis A., (1988). How to stubbornly refuse to make yourself miserable about anything—yes anything! Lyle Stuart Secaucus, NJGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellis A., (1996). Better, deeper, and more enduring brief therapy: The rational emotive behavior therapy approach Taylor and Francis New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellis A., (1997). Response to Jeffrey T. Guterman’s response to my critique of social constructivism in mental health counseling Journal of Mental Health Counseling 19: 57–63Google Scholar
  19. Ellis A., (1999). Why rational-emotive therapy to rational emotive behavior therapy?Psychotherapy 36: 154–159Google Scholar
  20. Ellis A., (2001). Overcoming destructive beliefs, feelings, and behaviors: New directions for rational emotive behavior therapy Prometheus Books Buffalo, NYGoogle Scholar
  21. Ellis A., Dryden W., (1990). The basic practice of RET In Dryden W., (Ed.), The essential Albert Ellis Springer New York (pp. 3–30)Google Scholar
  22. Ellis A. Sichel J., Yeager R., DiMattia D., DiGiuseppe R., (1989). Rational-emotive couples therapy Pergamon New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Ellis A., Yeager R. J., (1989). Why some therapies don’t work: the dangers of transpersonal psychology Prometheus Books Buffalo, NYGoogle Scholar
  24. Erickson M. H. (1980). Further clinical techniques of hypnosis: Utilization techniques. In Rossi E. L. (Ed.), The collected papers of Milton H. Erickson (Vol. 1, pp. 177–205). New York : IrvingtonGoogle Scholar
  25. Held B. S., (1986). The relationship between individual psychologies and strategic/systemic therapies reconsidered In Efron D. E., (Ed.), Journeys: Expansion of the strategic-systemic therapies Brunner/Mazel New York (pp. 222–260)Google Scholar
  26. Held B. S., (1992). The problem of strategy within the systemic therapiesJournal of Marital and Family Therapy 18: 25–35Google Scholar
  27. Liddle H. A., (1982). On the problem of eclecticism: A call for epistemological clarification and human-scale theories Family Process 21: 243–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meichenbaum D., (1977). Cognitive-behavior modification: An integrative approach Plenum New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Molnar A., de Shazer S., (1987). Solution-focused therapy: Toward the identification of therapeutic tasksJournal of Marital and Family Therapy 13: 349–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Norcross J. C., (1990). Commentary: Eclecticism misrepresented and integration misunderstoodPsychotherapy 27: 297–300Google Scholar
  31. Norcross J. C., Goldfried M., (1992). Handbook of psychotherapy integration Basic Books New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. O’Hanlon W. H., Weiner-Davis M., (1989). In search of solutions: A new direction in psychotherapy Norton New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Paul G. L., (1967). Strategy of outcome research in psychotherapyJournal of Consulting Psychology 31: 109–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Petzold C., (1981). Erickson and Ellis: An elegant integration based on the innovative techniques of both Corrective and Social Psychiatry and Journal of Behavior Technology Methods and Therapy 27(1): 27–34Google Scholar
  35. Safran J. D., Messer S. B., (1997). Psychotherapy integration: A postmodern critique Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 4: 140–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Walen S. R., DiGiuseppe R., Dryden W., (1992). A practitioner’s guide to rational-emotive therapy Oxford University Press New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Barry UniversityMiami ShoresUSA

Personalised recommendations