Hanging Out with the Wrong Crowd? The Role of Unstructured Socializing in Adolescents’ Specialization in Delinquency and Substance Use
Despite abundant attention to offending specialization in criminology, scholars have only recently started to explore opportunity-driven explanations for within-individual patterns of specialization. The current study examines whether unstructured socializing with specific friends can explain within-individual changes in adolescents’ degree of specialization in delinquency and substance use.
Data were derived from the PROSPER Peers Project, a longitudinal study consisting of five waves of data on 11,183 adolescents (aged 10 to 17). The data include self-reports about engagement in delinquency and substance use, sociometric information, and information on the time respondents reported spending in unstructured socializing with their nominated friends. Hypotheses were tested with negative binomial and binomial logit multilevel models.
The findings indicate that involvement in unstructured socializing with friends who steal, vandalize, commit violence, use alcohol, use cigarettes, or use drugs enhances adolescents’ risks for engagement in those respective behaviors. Such activity affects adolescents’ quantitative engagement as well as their level of specialization in these behaviors.
The study indicates that routine activity—in particular involvement in unstructured socializing—explains within-individual changes in deviance specialization among adolescents. Thus, exposure to opportunities can explain why adolescents specialize in certain types of delinquency and substance use in one time-period, and in other types of behavior in other time-periods. This adds a proximate explanation for this phenomenon to other explanations that focus on local life circumstances and peer group affiliation.
KeywordsDelinquency versatility Poly-substance use Unstructured socializing Peer influence Adolescence
The authors would like to thank Gerben Bruinsma, the editor, and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.
This work was supported by Grants from the W.T. Grant Foundation ; National Institute on Drug Abuse [R01-DA018225]; and National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [R24-HD041025]. The analyses used data from PROSPER, a Project directed by R. L. Spoth, funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse [R01-DA013709]; and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism [AA14702]. The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
- Akers RL (1998) Social learning and social structure: a general theory of crime and deviance. Northeastern University Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Anderson E (1999) Code of the street: decency, violence, and the moral life of the Inner City. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Barker RG (1968) Ecological psychology: concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
- Blumstein A, Cohen J, Roth JA, Visher C (1986) Criminal careers and “career criminals”, vol 1. National Academy Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- Cloward R, Ohlin L (1960) Delinquency and opportunity: a theory of delinquent gangs. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Cooper JM (2007) Cognitive dissonance: fifty years of a classic theory. Sage, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
- Egginton R, Williams L, Parker H (2002) Going out drinking: the centrality of heavy alcohol use in English adolescents’ leisure time and poly-substance-taking repertoires. J Subst Use 7:125–135Google Scholar
- Farrington DP (1986) Age and crime. In: Tonry M, Morris N (eds) Crime and justice: a review of research, vol 7. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 189–250Google Scholar
- Felson M (1995) Those who discourage crime. In: Eck JE, Weisburd DL (eds) Crime and place: crime prevention studies. Criminal Justice Press, MonseyGoogle Scholar
- Festinger L (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
- Hindelang MJ, Gottfredson MR, Garofalo J (1978) Victims of personal crime: an empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Ballinger Publisher and Co, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Piquero AR, Farrington DP, Blumstein A (2003) The criminal career paradigm. In: Tonry M (ed) Crime and justice: a review of research, vol 30. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 359–506Google Scholar
- Short JF Jr, Strodtbeck FL (1965) Group process and gang delinquency. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Steketee M (2012) The lifestyles of youth and their peers. In: Junger-Tas J, Haen Marshall I, Enzmann D, Killias M, Steketee M, Gruszczynska B (eds) The many faces of youth crime: Contrasting theoretical perspectives on juvenile delinquency across countries and cultures. Springer, New York, pp 237–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sutherland EH, Cressey DR (1955) Principles of criminology, 5th edn. Lippincott, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- Thorlindsson T, Bernburg JG (2006) Peer groups and substance use: examining the direct and interactive effect of leisure activity. Adolescence 41:321–339Google Scholar
- Tumminello M, Edling C, Liljeros F, Mantegna RN, Sarnecki J (2013) The phenomenology of specialization of criminal suspects. PLoS ONE 8:1–8Google Scholar
- Vanyukov MM, Tarter RE, Kirillova GP, Kirisci L, Reynolds MD, Kreek MJ, Conway KP, Maher BS, Iacono WG, Bierut L, Neale MC, Clark DB, Ridenour TA (2012) Common liability to addiction and ‘gateway hypothesis’: theoretical, empirical, and evolutionary perspective. Drug Alcohol Depend 123:S3–S17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Weerman FM, Hoeben EM, Bernasco W, Pauwels LJR, Bruinsma GJN (2018b) Studying situational effects of setting characteristics: research examples from the study of peers, activities, and neighborhoods. In: Bruinsma GJN, Johnson S (eds) The Oxford handbook of environmental criminology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 600–628Google Scholar
- Wikström P-OH, Oberwittler D, Treiber K, Hardie B (2012) Breaking rules: the social and situational dynamics of young people’s urban crime. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar