Gang Organization and Gang Identity: An Investigation of Enduring Gang Membership
Motivated by recent advances in the study of disengagement from street gangs, this research develops a theoretical framework of enduring gang membership based on gang organization and gang identity. Using multivariate data, this research tests the theoretical framework against a competing theory derived from the general theory of crime where gang organization and gang identity are non-existent or unimportant in producing enduring gang membership.
Eight waves of panel data on high-risk youth from the Denver Youth Survey and discrete-time event-history models are used to investigate enduring gang membership.
The length of time an individual spends in a gang is associated with the perceived organization of the gang and an individual’s gang identity. In a hazard model, accounting for right censoring, low self-control, and contextual time-varying gang related variables, increases in gang identity were associated with (on average) a 26% lower rate of reporting no longer being a gang member. Increases in perceived gang organization were associated with (on average) a 12% lower rate of reporting no longer being a gang member. Surprisingly however, no association was found between gang organization and gang identity.
This research finds support for using a theoretical framework based on gang organization and gang identity to understand enduring gang membership. Both gang identity and gang organization exert independent effects on the length of time an individual spends in a gang.
KeywordsGangs Disengagement from gangs Enduring gang membership Gang organization Gang identity
We thank Callie Burt, Jerry Herting, Katherine O’Neill, and Lynette Hoelter for helpful comments on an earlier draft, Aimée Dechter for helpful advice, and the Center for Social Science Computation and Research at the University of Washington and Charles Lanfear for computing assistance.
This research was supported by grants from the Blumstein-Jordan Endowed Professorship in Sociology, University of Washington, the National Institute of Justice (2014-R2-CX-0018), and the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (1256082). Partial support for this research came from a Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development research infrastructure grant to the Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology at the University of Washington (R24 HD042828).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Allison PD (2013) Event history analysis. Sage Publication, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
- Becker HS (1963) Outsiders studies in the sociology of deviance. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Bloch HA, Niederhoffer A (1958) The gang: a study in adolescent behavior. Philosophical Library, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Cloward RA, Ohlin LE (1960) Delinquency and opportunity: a theory of delinquent gangs. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Cressey DR (1972) Criminal organization: its elementary forms. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Dewey J (1922) Human nature and conduct. Henry Holt and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Durán R (2013) Gang life in two cities: an insider’s journey. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Durkheim E (1964) The division of labor in society. Free Press, New York (1893) Google Scholar
- Esbensen FA, Winfree LT Jr, He N, Taylor TJ (2001) Youth gangs and definitional issues: when is a gang a gang, and why does it matter? NCCD News 47:105–130Google Scholar
- Gambetta D (1993) The Sicilian Mafia: the business of private protection. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Gambetta D (2009) Codes of the underworld: how criminals communicate. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Gottfredson MR, Hirschi T (1990) A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
- Hennigan K, Spanovic M (2012) Gang dynamics through the lens of social identity theory. In: Esbensen FA, Maxson CL (eds) Youth gangs in international perspective. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Hindelang MJ, Hirschi T, Weis JG (1981) Measuring delinquency. Sage Publications, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
- Hogg MA, Abrams D (1993) Towards a single-process uncertainty-reduction model of social motivation in groups. In: Hogg MA, Abrams D (eds) Group motivation: social psychological perspectives. Havester Wheatsheaf, BirminghamGoogle Scholar
- Hope TL (2003) Do families matter? The relative effects of family characteristics, selfcontrol, and delinquency on gang membership. In: Calhoun TC, Chapple CL (eds) Readings in juvenile delinquency and juvenile justice. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, pp 168–185Google Scholar
- Horowitz R (1983) Honor and the American dream: culture and identity in a Chicano community. Rutgers University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
- Howell JC, Griffiths E (2015) Gangs in America’s communities. Sage Publications, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
- Huizinga, D. Denver Youth Survey Waves 1–10, (1987-1999) [Denver, Colorado]Google Scholar
- Jankowski MS (1991) Islands in the street: gangs and American urban society. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL (1980) The statistical analysis of failure time data. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Klein MW (1971) Street gangs and street workers. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
- Laub JH, Sampson RJ (2003) Shared beginnings, divergent lives: delinquent boys to age 70. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Matsueda RL (2013) Rational choice research in criminology: a multi-level framework. In: Wittek R, Snijders T, Nee V (eds) Handbook of rational choice social research. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, pp 283–321Google Scholar
- Mead GH (1934) Mind, self and society. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Melde C, Esbensen FA (2013) The relative impact of gang status transitions: identifying the mechanisms of change in delinquency. J Res Crime Delinq 51:259–276Google Scholar
- Miller J (2001) One of the guys: girls, gangs, and gender. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Padilla FM (1992) The gang as an American enterprise. Rutgers University Press, RutgersGoogle Scholar
- Short JF (1985) The level of explanation problem in criminology. In: Meier RF (ed) Theoretical methods in criminology. Sage, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
- Short JF, Strodtbeck FL (1965) Group process and gang delinquency. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Tajfel H (1978) Social Categorization, Social Identity and Social Comparison. Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations 61–76.Google Scholar
- Tajfel H, Turner JC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin WG, Worchel S (eds) The social psychology of intergroup relations. Brooks-Cole, Monterey, pp 33–47Google Scholar
- Taylor CS (1990) Dangerous society. Michigan State University Press, East LansingGoogle Scholar
- Thomas WI, Thomas DS (1928) The child in America. Alfred A, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Thornberry TP (2003) Gangs and delinquency in developmental perspective. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Thornberry TP, Huizinga D, Loeber R (2004) The causes and correlates studies: findings and policy implications. Juv Justice 9:3–19Google Scholar
- Thrasher FM (1927) The gang. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS (1987) Rediscovering the social group: a self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Vigil EB (1999) The crusade for justice: Chicano militancy and the government’s war on dissent. University of Wisconsin Press, MadisonGoogle Scholar
- Weber M (1922) Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press, Berkeley (1978) Google Scholar
- Yablonsky L (1967) The violent gang. Pelican Book, MiddlesexGoogle Scholar