The (In)Stability of Residential Burglary Patterns on Street Segments: The Case of Antwerp, Belgium 2005–2016
To examine the spatial concentration and spatial stability of residential burglary at micro places in the context of a substantial city-level burglary drop in Antwerp, Belgium.
51,337 police recorded home burglary incidents for the period 2005–2016 are geo-referenced to 26,875 street segments. Longitudinal trends in spatial concentrations of burglary are considered using descriptive statistics, generalized Gini coefficients, and local Getis–Ord statistics. Andresen’s (Appl Geogr 29(3):333–345, 2009) non-parametric spatial point pattern test (SPPT) is used to identify spatial stability in burglary point patterns and evaluate the ubiquity of a city-level burglary drop across street segments. A longitudinal extension of the SPPT is implemented.
Residential burglary is substantially concentrated in street segments. Burglary point patterns exhibit a moderate to high degree of spatial stability over time. Local analyses show that 91% of street segments with burglary experienced a net decrease in crime and under 1% of street segments with burglary experienced a net increase. Absolute spatial stability over time is found for just 1.43% of street segments with burglary and minor increases are consistently observed for as few as 11 street segments with burglary.
The citywide home burglary drop manifested itself uniformly across street segments with burglary and the majority of street segments that experienced burglary contributed relatively equally to the crime drop. In other words, we find no strong evidence that the city-level crime drop can be tied to substantial decreases in a few specific places, nor do we find that the reductions in burglary are spatially concentrated.
KeywordsSpatial point pattern test Spatial stability Crime trends Street segment
Christophe Vandeviver and Wouter Steenbeek are both to be regarded as co-first authors of this article. Christophe Vandeviver is a Postdoctoral Fellow of the Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO). Part of this work was carried out while Christophe Vandeviver was International Fellow at the Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR).
Vandeviver’s contribution to this work was supported by the Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO) Postdoctoral Fellowship funding scheme and the Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO) Long Stay Abroad funding scheme [FWO15/PDO/242 to C.V., V4.303.16N to C.V.]. Steenbeek’s contribution to this work was supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) Innovational Research Incentives Scheme [VENI 451-12-011 to W.S.].
- Antwerp Local Police Department (2017) Criminaliteit in Antwerpen daalt voor vierde jaar op rij [Crime in Antwerp Drops for Four Consecutive Years]. Retrieved from https://www.politieantwerpen.be/news/press-item/criminaliteit-antwerpen-daalt-voor-vierde-jaar-op-rij. Accessed 15 June 2017
- Beavon DJK, Brantingham PL, Brantingham PJ (1994) The influence of street networks on the patterning of propery offenses. In: Clarke RV (ed) Crime prevention studies. Willow Tree Press, Monsey, pp 115–148Google Scholar
- Belgian Federal Police (2017) Police crime statistics. Retrieved from http://www.stat.policefederale.be/criminaliteitsstatistieken/. Accessed 15 June 2017
- Blumstein A, Rosenfeld R (2008) Factors contributing to U.S. crime trends. In: National Research Council Committee on Understanding Crime Trends Committee on Law and Justice Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education (ed) Understanding crime trends: workshop report. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, pp 13–43Google Scholar
- Davies T, Bowers K (2014) Quantifying the deterrent effect of police patrol via GPS analysis. In: Paper presented at the GIS research UK (GISRUK) 2015, LeedsGoogle Scholar
- Mayhew P (2012) The case of Australia and New Zealand. In: Van Dijk JJM, Tseloni A, Farrell G (eds) The international crime drop: new directions in research. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
- Ouimet M (2002) Explaining the American and Canadian crime drop in the 1990’s. Can J Criminol Crim Justice 44(1):33–50Google Scholar
- Taylor RB (1998) Crime and small-scale places: what we know, what we can prevent, and what else we need to know. In: Taylor RB, Bazemore G, Boland B, Clear TR, Corbett RPJ, Feinblatt J, Berman G, Sviridoff M, Stone C (eds) Crime place: plenary papers of the 1997 conference on criminal Justice research and evaluation. National Institute of Justice, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Truman JL, Langton L (2015) Criminal victimization, 2014 (NCJ 248973). Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Van Dijk JJM, Van Kesteren JN, Smit P (2008) Criminal victimisation in international perspective: key findings from the 2004–2005 ICVS and EU ICS. Boom Legal Publishers, The HagueGoogle Scholar
- Van Dijk JJM, Tseloni A, Farrell G (eds) (2012) The international crime drop: new directions in research. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
- Weisburd DL, Bushway S, Lum C, Yang S-M (2004) Trajectories of crime at places: a longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology 42(2):283–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00521.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar