Socialization, Selection, or Both? The Role of Gene–Environment Interplay in the Association Between Exposure to Antisocial Peers and Delinquency

  • Joseph A. Schwartz
  • Starr J. Solomon
  • Bradon A. Valgardson
Original Paper

Abstract

Objectives

To better explain the near-universal association between peer and self-reported delinquency, three frameworks have been offered and have received varying degrees of support: (1) socialization or the social transmission of norms, attitudes, and behaviors among group members; (2) selection or the congregation of youth with similar traits and predispositions; and (3) enhancement or a combination of socialization and selection processes.

Methods

Making use of sibling pairs and peer network data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, the current study compares all three frameworks using modified bivariate Cholesky models to simultaneously examine gene-environment correlations (rGE) and interactions (G × E).

Results

Findings revealed that peer deviance (as reported by peers themselves) moderated underlying influences on delinquency such that genetic influences decreased and environmental influences increased as peer deviance increased. While previous studies have reported additional patterns of moderation (e.g., increases in both genetic and environmental influences), such studies have relied on subjective measures of peer behavior, more restrictive measures of delinquency, and samples comprised of young children.

Conclusions

The results revealed preliminary evidence in favor of the selection hypothesis, but the overall patterns of moderation stemming from the examined G × E fall in line more closely with the enhancement hypothesis of peer influence.

Keywords

Peers Delinquency Developmental theory Gene–environment interplay 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank JC Barnes, Jon Brauer, and Jukka Savolainen for thoughtful comments on previous drafts of this study. We would also like to thank Laura Dugan and the three anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and comments, as they have certainly strengthened the study. The content of this article is the authors’ sole responsibility and any errors or omissions are solely ours. This research uses data from Add Health, a program project directed by Kathleen Mullan Harris and designed by J. Richard Udry, Peter S. Bearman, and Kathleen Mullan Harris at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and funded by grant P01-HD31921 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, with cooperative funding from 23 other federal agencies and foundations. Special acknowledgment is due Ronald R. Rindfuss and Barbara Entwisle for assistance in the original design. Information on how to obtain the Add Health data files is available on the Add Health website (http://www.cpc.unc.edu/addhealth). No direct support was received from Grant P01-HD31921 for this analysis.

Supplementary material

10940_2017_9368_MOESM1_ESM.docx (37 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 38 kb)

References

  1. Acock AC (2005) Working with missing values. J Marriage Fam 67:1012–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agnew R (1991) The interactive effects of peer variables on delinquency. Criminology 29:47–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agrawal A, Balasubramanian S, Smith EK, Madden PA, Bucholz KK, Heath AC, Lynskey MT (2010) Peer substance involvement modifies genetic influences on regular substance involvement in young women. Addiction 105:1844–1853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akers RL (1973) Deviant behavior: a social learning approach. Wadsworth, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  5. Akers RL (1991) Self-control as a general theory of crime. J Quant Criminol 7:201–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Akers RL (2008) Self-control and social learning theory. In: Goode E (ed) Out of control: assessing the general theory of crime. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 77–89Google Scholar
  7. Akers RL, Jensen GF (2006) The empirical status of social learning theory: past, present, and future. In: Cullen FT, Wright JP, Blevins KR (eds) Taking stock: the status of criminological theory. Advances in criminological theory, vol 15. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, pp 37–76Google Scholar
  8. Allen JP, Porter MR, McFarland FC (2006) Leaders and followers in adolescent close friendships: Susceptibility to peer influence as a predictor of risky behavior, friendship instability, and depression. Dev Psychopathol 18:155–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Banikiotes PG, Neimeyer GJ (1981) Construct importance and rating similarity as determinants of interpersonal attraction. Br J Soc Psychol 20:259–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barnes JC, Beaver KM, Young JTN, TenEyck M (2014) A behavior genetic analysis of the tendency for youth to associate according to GPA. Soc Netw 38:41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beaver KM, Holtfreter K (2009) Biosocial influences on fraudulent behaviors. J Genet Psychol 170:101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beaver KM, DeLisi M, Wright JP, Vaughn MG (2009) Gene–environment interplay and delinquent involvement evidence of direct, indirect, and interactive effects. J Adolesc Res 24:147–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Belsky J, Pluess M (2009) Beyond diathesis stress: differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychol Bull 135:885–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bleda PR (1974) Toward a clarification of the role of cognitive and affective processes in the similarity-attraction relationship. J Pers Soc Psychol 29:368–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brauer JR (2009) Testing social learning theory using reinforcement’s residue: a multilevel analysis of self-reported theft and marijuana use in the national youth survey. Criminology 47:929–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brechwald WA, Prinstein MJ (2011) Beyond homophily: a decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. J Res Adolesc 21:166–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brendgen RM (2012) Genetics and peer relations: a review. J Res Adolesc 22:419–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brendgen RM, Dionne G, Girard A, Boivin M, Vitaro F, Pérusse D (2005) Examining genetic and environmental effects on social aggression: a study of 6-year-old twins. Child Dev 76:930–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brendgen M, Boivin M, Vitaro F, Bukowski WM, Dionne G, Tremblay RE, Pérusse D (2008) Linkages between children’s and their friends’ social and physical aggression: evidence for a gene-environment interaction? Child Dev 79:13–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brendgen RM, Vitaro F, Boivin M, Girard A, Bukowski WM, Dionne G, Pérusse D (2009) Gene–environment interplay between peer rejection and depressive behavior in children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 50:1009–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bronfenbrenner U, Ceci SJ (1994) Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: a bioecological model. Psychol Rev 101:568–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Burgess RL, Akers RL (1966) A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Soc Probl 19:101–113Google Scholar
  23. Burt SA, Klump K (2013) Delinquent peer affiliation as an etiological moderator of childhood delinquency. Psychol Med 43:1269–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Button TMM, Corley RP, Rhee SH, Hewitt JK, Young SE, Stallings MC (2007) Delinquent peer affiliation and conduct problems: a twin study. J Abnorm Psychol 116:554–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Byrd AL, Manuck SB (2014) MAOA, childhood maltreatment, and antisocial behavior: meta-analysis of a gene–environment interaction. Biol Psychiatry 75:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Caspi A (2002) Social selection, social causation, and developmental pathways: empirical strategies for better understanding how individuals and environments are linked across the life course. In: Pulkkinen L, Caspi A (eds) Paths to successful development. Personality in the life course. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 281–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chen X, Chang L, Liu H, He Y (2008) Effects of the peer group on the development of social functioning and academic achievement: a longitudinal study in Chinese children. Child Dev 79:235–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Chirstakis NA, Fowler JH (2007) The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N Engl J Med 357:370–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Christakis NA, Fowler JH (2008) The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. N Engl J Med 358:2249–2258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Christakis NA, Fowler JH (2014) Friendship and natural selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:10796–10801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Connolly EJ, Schwartz JA, Nedelec JL, Beaver KM, Barnes JC (2015) Different slopes for different folks: genetic influences on growth in delinquent peer association and delinquency during adolescence. J Youth Adolesc 44:1413–1427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Cullen FT (2011) Beyond adolescence-limited criminology: choosing our future. Criminology 49:287–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. de la Haye K, Green HD, Kennedy DP, Pollard MS, Tucker JS (2013) Selection and influence mechanisms associated with marijuana initiation and use in adolescent friendship networks. J Res Adolesc 23:474–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dick DM, Agrawal A, Keller MC, Adkins A, Aliev F, Monroe S, Sher KJ (2015) Candidate gene–environment interaction research: reflections and recommendations. Perspect Psychol Sci 10:37–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. DiLalla LF, Elam KK, Smolen A (2009) Genetic and gene-environment interaction effects on preschoolers’ social behaviors. Dev Psychobiol 51:451–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Duncan L (2014) Gene–environment interactions (G × E) in behavioral genetics. In: Rhee SH, Ronald A (eds) Behavior genetics of psychopathology. Springer, New York, pp 253–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Duncan LE, Keller MC (2011) A critical review of the first 10 years of candidate gene-by-environment interaction research in psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry 168:1041–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ellis BJ, Boyce WT, Belsky J, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Van IJzendoorn MH (2011) Differential susceptibility to the environment: an evolutionary–neurodevelopmental theory. Dev Psychopathol 23:7–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Espelage DL, Holt MK, Henkel RR (2003) Examination of peer–group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence. Child Dev 74:205–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fergusson DM, Woodward LJ, Horwood LJ (1999) Childhood peer relationship problems and young people’s involvement with deviant peers in adolescence. J Abnorm Child Psychol 27:357–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ficks CA, Waldman ID (2014) Candidate genes for aggression and antisocial behavior: a meta-analysis of association studies of the 5HTTLPR and MAOA-uVNTR. Behav Genet 44:427–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Flashman J, Gambetta D (2014) Thick as thieves: homophily and trust among deviants. Ration Soc 26:3–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Fowler T, Shelton K, Lifford K, Rice F, McBride A, Nikolov I, Neale MC, Harold G, Thapar A, Van Den Bree MBM (2007) Genetic and environmental influences on the relationship between peer alcohol use and own alcohol use in adolescence. Addiction 102:894–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Fowler JH, Sette JE, Christakis NA (2011) Correlated genotypes in friendship networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:1993–1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gardner M, Steinberg L (2005) Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: an experimental study. Dev Psychol 41:625–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gatti U, Tremblay RE, Vitaro F, McDuff P (2005) Youth gangs, delinquency and drug use: a test of the selection, facilitation, and enhancement hypotheses. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 46:1178–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gaughan M (2006) The gender structure of adolescent peer influence on drinking. J Health Soc Behav 47:47–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gillespie NA, Neale MC, Jacobson K, Kendler KS (2009) Modeling the genetic and environmental association between peer group deviance and cannabis use in male twins. Addiction 104:420–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Glueck S, Glueck E (1950) Unraveling juvenile delinquency. The Commonwealth Fund, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Gottfredson MR, Hirschi T (1990) A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  51. Guo G, Li Y, Wang H, Cai T, Duncan GJ (2015) Peer influence, genetic propensity, and binge drinking: a natural experiment and a replication. Am J Sociol 121:914–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Harden KP, Hill JE, Turkheimer E, Emery RE (2008) Gene–environment correlation and interaction in peer effects on adolescent alcohol and tobacco use. Behav Genet 38:339–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Harris JR (2009) The nurture assumption: why children turn out the way they do. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Harris KM (2011) Design features of add health. Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  55. Harris KM (2013) The add health study: design and accomplishments. Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  56. Harris KM, Halpern CT, Smolen A, Haberstick BC (2006) The national longitudinal study of adolescent health (Add Health) twin data. Twin Res Hum Genet 9:988–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Harris KM, Halpern CT, Whitsel E, Hussey J, Tabor J, Entzel P, Udry JR (2009) The national longitudinal study of adolescent health: research design. http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design
  58. Haynie DL (2001) Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter? Am J Sociol 106:1013–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Haynie DL (2002) Friendship networks and delinquency: the relative nature of peer delinquency. J Quant Criminol 18:99–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Haynie DL, Osgood DW (2005) Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter? Soc Forces 84:1109–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Haynie DL, Doogan NJ, Soller B (2014) Gender, friendship networks, and delinquency: a dynamic network approach. Criminology 52:688–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Hicks BM, DiRago AC, Iacono WG, McGue M (2009) Gene–environment interplay in internalizing disorders: consistent findings across six environmental risk factors. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 50:1309–1317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hill J, Emery RE, Harden KP, Mendle J, Turkheimer E (2008) Alcohol use in adolescent twins and affiliation with substance using peers. J Abnorm Child Psychol 36:81–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hirschi T (1969) Causes of delinquency. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  65. Hirschi T, Gottfredson MR (1987) Cause of white-collar crime. Criminology 25:949–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Hirschi T, Gottfredson MR (2000) In defense of self-control. Theor Criminol 4:55–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Hoeben EM, Meldrum RC, Young JTN (2016) The role of peer delinquency and unstructured socializing in explaining delinquency and substance use: a state-of-the-art review. J Crim Just 47:108–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Hoffman BR, Monge PR, Chou CP, Valente TW (2007) Perceived peer influence and peer selection on adolescent smoking. Addict Behav 32:1546–1554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6:1–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Iervolino AC, Pike A, Manke B, Reiss D, Hetherington EM, Plomin R (2002) Genetic and environmental influences in adolescent peer socialization: evidence from two genetically sensitive designs. Child Dev 73:162–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Kendler KS, Jacobson KC, Gardner CO, Gillespie N, Aggen SA, Prescott CA (2007) Creating a social world: a developmental twin study of peer-group deviance. Arch Gen Psychiatry 64:958–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Kendler KS, Gardner C, Dick DM (2011) Predicting alcohol consumption in adolescence from alcohol-specific and general externalizing genetic risk factors, key environmental exposures and their interaction. Psychol Med 41:1507–1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Kendler KS, Lönn SL, Maes HH, Sundquist J, Sundquist K (2015) The etiologic role of genetic and environmental factors in criminal behavior as determined from full-and half-sibling pairs: an evaluation of the validity of the twin method. Psychol Med 45:1873–1880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Kinsman SB, Romer D, Furstenberg FF, Schwarz DF (1998) Early sexual initiation: the role of peer norms. Pediatrics 102:1185–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Kiuru N, Burk WJ, Laursen B, Salmela-Aro K, Nurmi JE (2010) Pressure to drink but not to smoke: disentangling selection and socialization in adolescent peer networks and peer groups. J Adolesc 33:801–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Latendresse SJ, Bates JE, Goodnight JA, Lansford JE, Buddle JP, Goate A, Dodge KA, Pettit GS, Dick DM (2011) Differential susceptibility to adolescent externalizing trajectories: examining the interplay between CHRM2 and peer group antisocial behavior. Child Dev 82:1797–1814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Lee SS (2011) Deviant peer affiliation and antisocial behavior: interaction with monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) genotype. J Abnorm Child Psychol 39:321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Lerner RM, Castellino DR (2002) Contemporary developmental theory and adolescence: developmental systems and applied developmental science. J Adolesc Health 31:122–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Lomi A, Snijders TAB, Steglich CEG, Torló VJ (2011) Why are some more peer than others? Evidence from a longitudinal study of social networks and individual academic performance. Soc Sci Res 40:1506–1520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Lu YF, Menard S (2017) The interplay of MAOA and peer influences in predicting adult criminal behavior. Psychiatry Q 88:115–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Matsueda RL, Anderson K (1998) The dynamics of delinquent peers and delinquent behavior. Criminology 36:269–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. McGloin JM, Shermer LO (2009) Self-control and deviant peer network structure. J Res Crime Delinq 40:35–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. McGue M, Carey BE (2017) Gene–environment interaction in the behavioral sciences: findings, challenges, and prospects. In: Tolan PH, Leventhal BL (eds) Gene–environment transactions in developmental psychopathology. Springer, New York, pp 35–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: homophiliy in social networks. Ann Rev Sociol 27:415–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Megens KimCIM, Weerman FM (2012) The social transmission of delinquency: effects of peer attitudes and behavior revisited. J Res Crime Delinq 49:420–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Meldrum RC, Boman JH (2013) Similarities and differences between perceptions of peer delinquency, peer self-reported delinquency, and respondent delinquency: an analysis of friendship dyads. J Crim Just 41:395–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Monahan KC, Steinberg L, Cauffman E (2009) Affiliation with antisocial peers, susceptibility to peer influence, and antisocial behavior during the transition to adulthood. Dev Psychol 45:1520–1530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Monroe SM, Simons AD (1991) Diathesis-stress theories in the context of life stress research: implications for the depressive disorders. Psychol Bull 110:406–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998–2012). Mplus: stataistical analysis with latent variables. User’s guide, 7th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  90. Neale MC, Cardon LR (1992) Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Kluwer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Plomin R, DeFries JC, Knopik VS, Neiderheiser J (2013) Behavioral genetics, 6th edn. Worth Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  92. Polderman TJC, Benyamin B, De Leeuw CA, Sullivan PF, Van Bochoven A, Visscher PM, Posthuma D (2015) Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nat Genet 47:702–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Pratt TC, Cullen FT, Sellers CSL, Thomas WJ, Madensen TD, Daigle LE, Gau JM (2010) The empirical status of social learning theory: a meta-analysis. Just Q 27:765–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Purcell S (2002) Variance components models for gene–environment interaction in twin analysis. Twin Res 5:554–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Rhee SH, Hewitt JK, Young SE, Corley RP, Crowley TJ, Stallings MC (2003) Genetic and environmental influences on substance initiation, use, and problem use in adolescents. Arch Gen Psychiatry 60:1256–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Rutter M, Moffitt TE, Caspi A (2006) Gene–environment interplay and psychopathology: multiple varieties but real effects. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 47:226–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Samek DR, Keyes MA, Iacono WG, McGue M (2013) Peer deviance, alcohol expectancies, and adolescent alcohol use: explaining shared and nonshared environmental effects using an adoptive sibling pair design. Behav Genet 43:286–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Samek DR, Goodman RJ, Erath S, McGue M, Iacono WG (2016) Antisocial peer affiliation and externalizing disorders in the transition from adolescent to young adulthood: Selection versus socialization effects. Dev Psychol 52:813–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Samek DR, Hicks B, Keyes MA, McGue M, Iacono WG (2017) Antisocial peer affiliation and externalizing disorders: evidence for gene x environment x development interaction. Dev Psychopathol 29:155–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Scarr S (1992) Developmental theories for the 1990s: development and individual differences. Child Dev 63:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Scarr S, McCartney K (1983) How people make their own environments: a theory of genotype-environment effects. Child Dev 54:424–435Google Scholar
  102. Shanahan MJ, Hofer SM (2005) Social context in gene–environment interactions: retrospect and prospect. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 60:65–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Snijders TAB, Baerveldt C (2003) A multilevel network study of the effects of delinquent behavior on friendship evolution. J Math Soc 27:123–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Stevens G, Owens D, Schaefer EC (1990) Education and attractiveness in marriage choices. Soc Psychol Q 53:62–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Sutherland EH (1947) Principles of criminology, 4th edn. J.B. Lippincott, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  106. Sutherland EH, Cressey DR (1955) Principles of criminology, 5th edn. J.B. Lippincott, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  107. TenEyck M, Barnes JC (2015) Examining the impact of peer group selection on self-reported delinquency: a consideration of active gene–environment correlation. Crim Just Behav 42:741–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Thomas KJ (2015) Delinquent peer influence on offending versatility: Can peers promote specialized delinquency? Criminology 53:280–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Thomas KJ, McGloin JM (2013) A dual-systems approach for understanding differential susceptibility to processes of peer influence. Criminology 51:435–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Thornberry TP, Krohn MD, Lizotte AJ, Chard-Wierschem D (1993) The role of juvenile gangs in facilitating delinquent behavior. J Res Crime Delinq 30:55–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Turkheimer E (2000) Three laws of behavior genetics and what they mean. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 9:160–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Turkheimer E, Harden KP (2014) Behavior genetic research methods: testing quasi-causal hypotheses using multivariate twin data. In: Reis HT, Judd CM (eds) Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 159–187Google Scholar
  113. Turkheimer E, Waldron M (2000) Nonshared environment: a theoretical, methodological, and quantitative review. Psychol Bull 126:78–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Turnovic JJ, Young JTN (2016) Violent offending and victimization in adolescence: social network mechanisms and homophily. Criminology 54:487–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Tuvblad C, Grann M, Lichtenstein P (2006) Heritability for adolescent antisocial behavior differs with socioeconomic status: gene–environment interaction. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 47:734–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Udry JR (2003) The national longitudinal study of adolescent health (Add Health), waves I and II, 1994–1996; wave III, 2001–2002 [machine-readable data file and documentation]. Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  117. Valente TW, Fujimoto K, Chou CP, Spruijt-Metz D (2009) Adolescent affiliations and adiposity: a social network analysis of friendships and obesity. J Adolesc Health 45:202–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Van Ryzin MJ, Dishion TJ (2014) Adolescent deviant peer clustering as an amplifying mechanism underlying the progression from early substance use to late adolescent dependence. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 55:1153–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Warr M (2002) Companions in crime. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Watts SJ, McNulty TL (2015) Delinquent peers and offending integrating social learning and biosocial theory. Youth Violence Juv Just 13:190–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Wentzel KR, Caldwell K (1997) Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Dev 68:1198–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Wright B, Entner R, Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Silva PA (1999) Low self-control, social bonds, and crime: social causation, social selection, or both? Criminology 37:479–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Young JT (2014) A sensitivity analysis of egocentric measures of peer delinquency to latent homophily. J Quant Criminol 30:373–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Young JT, Rebellon CJ, Barnes JC, Weerman FM (2014) Unpacking the black box of peer similarity in deviance: understanding the mechanisms linking personal behavior, peer behavior, and perceptions. Criminology 52:60–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Young JT, Rebellon CJ, Barnes JC, Weerman FM (2015) What do alternative measures of peer behavior tell us? Examining the discriminant validity of multiple methods of measuring peer deviance and the implications for etiological models. Just Q 32:626–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Zuckerman M (1999) Vulnerability to psychopathology: a biosocial model. American Psychological Association, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph A. Schwartz
    • 1
  • Starr J. Solomon
    • 1
  • Bradon A. Valgardson
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Criminology and Criminal JusticeUniversity of Nebraska at OmahaOmahaUSA

Personalised recommendations