The Concentration and Stability of Drug Activity in Seattle, Washington Using Police and Emergency Medical Services Data
- 762 Downloads
Prior research demonstrates that crime is highly concentrated at place and that these concentrations are stable from year to year, highlighting the importance of place to crime control and prevention. A potential limitation is that most studies only use one data source to diagnose these patterns. The present study uses data from both police and emergency medical services (EMS) to explore the spatial concentration and stability of drug activity in Seattle, Washington from 2009 to 2014.
We use concentration graphs and group-based trajectory analysis to examine concentration and stability of calls related to drug activity in both data sources separately and combined. Additionally, we employ Andresen’s S-Index to determine the similarity of concentration within the SPD data, the EMS data and the combined data year to year as well as the degree of co-location between the SPD and EMS data during the study period.
We find a high degree of concentration and group-based stability for both SPD and EMS drug calls across all street segments in Seattle. Conversely, we find only moderate local geographic stability of drug use across street segments as indicated by each of the data sources over the study period. Last, we find the spatial patterns in drug use as indicated by each data source are significantly different each year.
At the same time these findings provide support for the law of crime concentration, they also raise questions about local stability patterns. Additionally, they highlight the importance of expanding inquiries of crime and place research into new data sources. Our results serve to reinforce the importance of multiple data sets in quantifying, understanding, and responding to the drug problem in Seattle.
KeywordsDrugs EMS data Crime places Law of crime concentration Stability
- Andresen MA, Linning SJ, Malleson N (in press) Crime at places and spatial concentrations: exploring the spatial stability of property crime in Vancouver, BC 2003–2013. J Quant CriminolGoogle Scholar
- Banta-Green C, Jackson TR, Freng S, Hanrahan M, Graff C, Ohta J, Taylor M, Harruff R, Smith R, Finegood B, Sylla L, Williams J (2015) Drug abuse trends in the Seattle-King County area: 2014. University of Washington Alcohol and Drug Abuse Institute, SeattleGoogle Scholar
- Collins SE, Lonczak HS, Clifasefi SL (2015) LEAD program evaluation: recidivism report. Harm Reduction Research and Treatment Lab, University of Washington-Harborview Medical Center, SeattleGoogle Scholar
- Cooper HL (2015) War on drugs policing and police brutality. Substance use and Misuse, pp 1–7Google Scholar
- Miletich S (2014) Report cites plunge in SPD enforcement of low-level crime. Seattle Times (May 15)Google Scholar
- Oberwittler D, Wikström POH (2009) Why small is better: advancing the study of the role of behavioral contexts in crime causation. In: Weisburd D, Bernasco W, Bruinsma GJN (eds) Putting crime in its place: units of analysis in geographic criminology. Springer, New York, pp 35–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ratcliffe JH (2015) Harm-focused policing. Ideas in American Policing. Police Foundation Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Rengert G (1996) The geography of illegal drugs. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
- Steenbeek W, Weisburd D (in press) Where the action is in crime? An examination of variability of crime across different spatial units in The Hague, 2001–2009. J Quant CriminolGoogle Scholar
- Telep CW, Hibdon J (2016) An evaluation of Seattle’s drug market initiatives. Seattle Neighborhood Group, SeattleGoogle Scholar
- Wheeler AP, Robert RE, McLean SJ (in press) Replicating group-based trajectory models of crime at micro-places in Albany, NY. J Quant CriminolGoogle Scholar