Conditional Race Disparities in Criminal Sentencing: A Test of the Liberation Hypothesis From a Non-Guidelines State
- 1k Downloads
To test the liberation hypothesis in a judicial context unconstrained by sentencing guidelines.
We examined cross-sectional sentencing data (n = 17,671) using a hurdle count model, which combines a binary (logistic regression) model to predict zero counts and a zero-truncated negative binomial model to predict positive counts. We also conducted a series of Monte Carlo simulations to demonstrate that the hurdle count model provides unbiased estimates of our sentencing data and outperforms alternative approaches.
For the liberation hypothesis, results of the interaction terms for race x offense severity and race x criminal history varied by decision type. For the in/out decision, criminal history moderated the effects of race: among offenders with less extensive criminal histories blacks were more likely to be incarcerated; among offenders with higher criminal histories this race effect disappeared. The race x offense severity interaction was not significant for the in/out decision. For the sentence length decision, offense severity moderated the effects of race: among offenders convicted of less serious crimes blacks received longer sentences than whites; among offenders convicted of crimes falling in the most serious offense categories the race effect became non-significant for Felony D offenses and transitioned to a relative reduction for blacks for the most serious Felony A, B, and C categories. The race x criminal history interaction was not significant for the length decision.
There is some support for the liberation hypothesis in this test from a non-guidelines jurisdiction. The findings suggest, however, that the decision to incarcerate and the sentence length decision may employ different processes in which the interactions between race and seriousness measures vary.
KeywordsSentencing Racial disparities Criminal sentencing Liberation hypothesis Hurdle model
- Baldus DC, Woodworth G, Pulaski CA (1990) Equal justice and the death penalty: a legal and empirical analysis. Upne, LebanonGoogle Scholar
- Blumer H (1969) Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
- Blumstein A (1993) Racial disproportionality of US prison populations revisited. U Colo l Rev 64:743Google Scholar
- Chiricos TG, Crawford C (1995) Race and imprisonment: a contextual assessment of the evidence. In: Hawkins DF (ed) Ethnicity, race, and crime: perspectives across time and space. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
- Eisenstein J, Flemming RB, Nardulli PF (1988) The contours of justice: communities and their courts. Little, Brown, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Grattet R, Lin J (2014) Supervision intensity and parole outcomes: a competing risks approach to criminal and technical parole violations. Justice Q (epub ahead of print)Google Scholar
- Greene WH (1994) Accounting for excess zeros and sample selection in poisson and negative binomial regression models (March 1994). NYU Working Paper No. EC-94-10. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1293115
- Kalven H, Zeisel H, Callahan T, Ennis P (1966) The American jury. Little, Brown, Boston, p 498Google Scholar
- Kramer J, Ulmer J (2009) Sentencing guidelines: lessons from Pennsylvania. Lynne Rienner, BoulderGoogle Scholar
- Levin MA (1977) Urban politics and the criminal courts. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Long JS (1997) Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables, Advanced quantitative techniques in the social sciences, vol 7. SAGE PublicationsGoogle Scholar
- Long JS, Freese J (2014) Regression models for categorical dependent variables using stata. Stata press, College StationGoogle Scholar
- McAninch WS, Fairey FW, Coggiola LM (2007) The criminal law of South Carolina, 3rd edn. South Carolina Bar, ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
- Reitz KR (2009) Demographic impact statements, O’Connor’s warning, and the mysteries of prison release: topics from a sentencing reform agenda. Fla Law Rev 61:683Google Scholar
- Spohn C (2000) Thirty years of sentencing reform: the quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. In: National Institute of Justice: criminal justice 2000. National Institute of Justice, Washington Google Scholar
- Spohn C (2009) How do judges decide? The search for justice and fairness in punishment, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- Tonry M (1995) Malign neglect: race, crime, and punishment in America. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Tonry M (1996) Sentencing matters. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Ulmer JT (1997) Social worlds of sentencing: court communities under sentencing guidelines. SUNY Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Williams R (2012) Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. Stata J 12(2):308–331Google Scholar
- Zatz MS (2000) The convergence of race, ethnicity, gender, and class on court decisionmaking: looking toward the 21st century. In: Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system, vol 3. US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, pp 503–552Google Scholar
- Zorn CJ (1996) Evaluating zero-inflated and hurdle Poisson specifications. Midwest Polit Sci Assoc 18(20):1–16Google Scholar