Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 589–612 | Cite as

Replicating Group-Based Trajectory Models of Crime at Micro-Places in Albany, NY

  • Andrew P. WheelerEmail author
  • Robert E. Worden
  • Sarah J. McLean
Original Paper



Replicate two previous studies of temporal crime trends at the street block level. We replicate the general approach of group-based trajectory modelling of crimes at micro-places originally taken by Weisburd et al. (Criminology 42(2):283–322, 2004) and replicated by Curman et al. (J Quant Criminol 31(1):127–147, 2014). We examine patterns in a city of a different character (Albany, NY) than those previously examined (Seattle and Vancouver) and so contribute to the generalizability of previous findings.


Crimes between 2000 and 2013 were used to identify different trajectory groups at street segments and intersections. Zero-inflated Poisson regression models are used to identify the trajectories. Pin maps, Ripley’s K and neighbor transition matrices are used to show the spatial patterning of the trajectory groups.


The trajectory solution with eight classes is selected based on several model selection criteria. The trajectory of each those groups follow the overall citywide decline, and are only separated by the mean level of crime. Spatial analysis shows that higher crime trajectory groups are more likely to be nearby one another, potentially suggesting a diffusion process.


Our work adds additional support to that of others who have found tight coupling of crime at micro-places. We find that the clustering of trajectories identified a set of street units that disproportionately contributed to the total level of crime citywide in Albany, consistent with previous research. However, the temporal trends over time in Albany differed from those exhibited in previous work in Seattle but were consistent with patterns in Vancouver.


Group-based trajectory Micro-places Hot-spots Point-pattern Spatial criminology 



This research was supported by Award No. 2013-IJ-MU-0012, awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice, to the John F. Finn Institute. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Justice.


  1. Baddeley A, Turner R (2005) Spatstat: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. J Stat Softw 12(6):1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braga AA (2001) The effects of hot spots policing on crime. Annals Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 578(1):104–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braga AA, Bond BJ (2008) Policing crime and disorder hot spots: a randomized controlled trial. Criminology 46(3):577–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braga AA, Hureau DM, Papachristos AV (2010a) The relevance of micro places to citywide robbery trends: a longitudinal analysis of robbery incidents at street corners and block faces in Boston. J Res Crime Delinq 48(1):7–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braga AA, Papachristos AV, Hureau DM (2010b) The concentration and stability of gun violence at micro places in Boston, 1980–2008. J Quant Criminol 26(1):33–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brantingham PJ, Dyreson DA, Brantingham PL (1976) Crime seen through a cone of resolution. Am Behav Sci 20(2):261–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caplan JM, Kennedy LW, Miller J (2011) Risk terrain modeling: brokering criminological theory and GIS methods for crime forecasting. JQ 28(2):360–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cleveland WS, McGill R (1984) Graphical perception: theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. J Am Stat Assoc 79(387):531–554MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Curman AS, Andresen MA, Brantingham PJ (2014) Crime and place: a longitudinal examination of street segment patterns in Vancouver, BC. J Quant Criminol 31(1):127–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dixon PM (2002) Ripley’s K function. In: El-Shaarawi AH, Piegorsch WW (eds) Encyclopedia of Environmetrics. Wiley, Chichester, pp 1796–1803Google Scholar
  11. Erosheva EA, Matsueda RL, Telesca D (2014) Breaking bad: two decades of life-course data analysis in criminology, developmental psychology, and beyond. Ann Rev Stat App 1(1):301–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Farrell G, Tilley N, Tseloni A (2014) Why the crime drop? Crime Just 43:421–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Genolini C, Falissard B (2010) KmL: k-means for longitudinal data. Comp Stat 25(2):317–328MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldstein H (1990) Problem-oriented policing. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Groff ER (2014) Quantifying the exposure of street segments to drinking places nearby. J Quant Criminol 30(3):527–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Groff ER, Weisburd D, Yang SM (2010) Is it important to examine crime trends at a local “micro” level?: a longitudinal analysis of street to street variability in crime trajectories. J Quant Criminol 26(1):7–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hagberg AA, Schult DA, Swart PJ (2008) Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. In: Varoquauz G, Vaught T, Millmans J (eds) Proceedings of the 7th Python in science conference (SciPy2008) Pasadena, CAGoogle Scholar
  18. Hart T, Zandbergen P (2014) Kernel density estimation and hotspot mapping: examining the influence of interpolation method, grid cell size, and bandwidth on crime forecasting. Polic Int J Police Strateg Manag 37(2):305–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hinkle JC, Weisburd D, Famega C, Ready J (2013) The problem is not just sample size: the consequences of low base rates in policing experiments in smaller cities. Eval Rev 37(3–4):213–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson SD, Bernasco W, Bowers KJ, Elffers H, Ratcliffe JH, Rengert GF, Townsley M (2007) Space–time patterns of risk: a cross national assessment of residential burglary victimization. J Quant Criminol 23(3):201–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones BL, Nagin DS (2013) A note on a stata plugin for estimating group-based trajectory models. Soc Methods Res 42(4):608–613MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kreuter F, Muthén B (2008) Analyzing criminal trajectory profiles: bridging multilevel and group based approaches using growth mixture modeling. J Quant Criminol 34(1):1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Levine N, Kim KE (1998) The location of motor vehicle crashes in Honolulu: a methodology for geocoding intersections. Comput Environ Urban Sysst 22(6):557–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levine N, Wachs M, Shirazi E (1986) Crime at bus stops: a study of environmental factors. J Archit Plan Res 3(4):339–361Google Scholar
  25. Long JS (1997) Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Sage Publications, Thousand OakszbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Lum C, Koper CS, Telep CW (2010) The evidence-based policing matrix. J Exp Criminol 7(1):3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McDowall D, Loftin C (2009) Do city crime rates follow a national trend? The influence of nationwide conditions on local crime patterns. J Quant Criminol 25(3):307–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Melo SN, Matias LF, Andresen MA (2015) Crime concentrations and similarities in spatial crime patterns in a Brazilian context. Appl Geogr 62:314–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mohler GO, Short MB, Brantingham PJ, Schoenberg FP, Tita GE (2011) Self-exciting point process modeling of crime. J Am Stat Assoc 106(493):100–108MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Nagin D, Odgers C (2010) Group-based trajectory modeling (nearly) two decades later. J Quant Criminol 26(4):445–453CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Nielsen R, Rosenthal JD, Sun Y, Day DM, Bevc I, Duchesne T (2013) Group-based criminal trajectory analysis using the cross-validation criteria. Commun Stat Theory Methods 43(20):4337–4356MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Rey SJ, Mack EA, Koschinsky J (2012) Exploratory space-time analysis of burglary patterns. J Quant Criminol 28(3):509–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roundtable on Crime Trends in the United States (2015)
  34. Shaw CR, McKay HD (1969) Juvenile delinquency and urban areas: a study of rates of delinquency in relation to differential characteristics of local communities in American cities. Revised edition. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  35. Sherman LW, Weisburd D (1995) General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime hot spots: a randomized, controlled trial. Justice Q 12(4):625–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sherman LW, Gartin PR, Buerger ME (1989) Hot spots of predatory crime: routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology 27(1):27–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Skardhamar T (2010) Distinguishing facts and artifacts in group-based modeling. Criminology 48(1):295–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Skrondal A, Rabe-Hesketh S (2004) Generalized latent variable modeling: multilevel, longitudinal, and structural equation models. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca RotanCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. Souris M, Bichaud L (2011) Statistical methods for bivariate spatial analysis in marked points. Examples in spatial epidemiology. Spat Spatio-Temporal Epidemiol 2(4):227–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weisburd D (2015) The law of crime concentration and the criminology of place. Criminology 53(2):133–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weisburd D, Amram S (2014) The law of concentrations of crime at place: the case of Tel Aviv-Jaffa. Police Pract Res 15(2):101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Weisburd D, Gill C (2014) Block randomized trials at places: rethinking the limitations of small n experiments. J Quant Criminol 30(1):97–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weisburd D, Bushway SD, Lum C, Yang SM (2004) Trajectories of crime at places: a longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology 42(2):283–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weisburd D, Morris NA, Groff ER (2009) Hot spots of juvenile crime: a longitudinal study of arrest incidents at street segments in Seattle, Washington. J Quant Criminol 25(4):443–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weisburd D, Groff ER, Yang SM (2012) The criminology of place: street segments and our understanding of the crime problem. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weisburd D, Groff ER, Yang SM (2014) Understanding and controlling hot spots of crime: the importance of formal and informal social controls. Prev Sci 15(1):31–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilcox P, Eck J (2011) Criminology of the unpopular. Criminol Public Policy 10(2):473–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yang SM (2010) Assessing the spatial-temporal relationship between disorder and violence. J Quant Criminol 26(1):139–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The John F. Finn Institute for Public Safety, Inc.AlbanyUSA
  2. 2.University at Albany, SUNYAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations