Advertisement

Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 207–236 | Cite as

The Absorbing Status of Incarceration and its Relationship with Wealth Accumulation

  • Michelle Lee Maroto
Original Paper

Abstract

Objectives

This study extends our knowledge on the negative effects of incarceration to the accumulation of wealth by examining whether, how, and how much incarceration affects home ownership and net worth. It also investigates how these outcomes vary with the time since a person was incarcerated and the number of incarceration periods, along with addressing potential mechanisms behind this relationship.

Methods

I apply hybrid mixed effects models that disaggregate within- and between person variation to investigate incarceration’s relationship with home ownership and net worth, using National Longitudinal Study of Youth data from 1985 to 2008. I also incorporate a set of mediation models in order to test for indirect effects of incarceration on wealth through earnings, health, and family formation.

Results

My results show that incarceration limits wealth accumulation. Compared to never-incarcerated persons, ex-offenders are less likely to own their homes by an average of 5 percentage points, and their probability of home ownership decreases by an additional 28 percentage points after incarceration. Ex-offenders’ net worth also decreases by an average of $42,000 in the years after incarceration.

Conclusions

When combined with previous research on incarceration, my findings show that incarceration acts as an absorbing status, potentially leading to the accumulation of disadvantage. Although incarceration’s negative effects on wealth accumulation were partially mediated by its relationship with earnings and family formation, incarceration directly affected home ownership and net worth. In most cases, former inmates began with flatter wealth trajectories and experienced additional losses after incarceration.

Keywords

Incarceration Stratification Cumulative disadvantage Wealth Home ownership 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I gratefully acknowledge Barbara Reskin for her insightful comments on drafts of this paper. I would also like to thank Becky Pettit and the participants of the University of Washington Sociology Deviance Seminar for their feedback. Partial support for this research came from a Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development research infrastructure Grant, R24 HD042828, to the Center for Studies in Demography & Ecology at the University of Washington.

Supplementary material

10940_2014_9231_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (367 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 367 kb)

References

  1. Allison PD (2009) Fixed effects regression models. Sage Publications, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  2. Apel R, Sweeten G (2010) The impact of incarceration on employment during the transition to adulthood. Soc Probl 57(3):448–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apel R, Blokland AAJ, Niewbeerta P, van Schellen M (2010) The impact of imprisonment on marriage and divorce: a risk set matching approach. J Quant Criminol 26:269–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauer DJ, Preacher KJ, Gil KM (2006) Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: new procedures and recommendations. Psychol Methods 11(2):142–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bjerk D (2009) How much can we trust causal interpretations of fixed-effects estimators in the context of criminality? J Quant Criminol 25(4):391–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Breen R, Karlson KB, Holm A (2013) Total, direct, and indirect effects in logit models. Sociol Methods Res 42(2):164–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bricker J, Kennickell A, Moore K, Sabelhaus J (2012) Changes in U.S. family finances from 2007 to 2010: evidence from the survey of consumer finances. Fed Reserve Bull 98:1–80Google Scholar
  8. Bucks BK (2012) Out of balance? Financial distress in U.S. households. In Porter K (Ed.) Broke: how debt bankrupts the middle class. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). (2010) Prison inmates at midyear 2009-statistical tables, NCJ 230113. Washington, DC: U.S. GPO, U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved on August 5, 2011. (http://www.bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=2200)
  10. Cadge W, Davidman L (2006) Ascription, choose, and the construction of religious identities in the contemporary United States. J Sci Study Relig 45(1):23–38Google Scholar
  11. Campbell LA, Kaufman RL (2006) Racial differences in household wealth: beyond black and white. Res Soc Stratif Mobil 24:131–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carson EA, Sabol WJ (2012) Prisoners in 2011. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. NCJ 2399808Google Scholar
  13. Chase ID (1991) Vacancy chains. Ann Rev Sociol 17:133–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Conley D (1999) Being black, living in the red: race, wealth, and social policy in America. University of California Press, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  15. Curran PJ, Bauer DJ (2011) The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annu Rev Psychol 62:583–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DiPrete TA, Eirich GM (2006) Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: a review of theoretical developments. Annu Rev Sociol 32:271–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dynan KE, Kohn DL (2007) The rise in U.S. household indebtedness: Causes and consequences. Finance and Economics Discussion Series Working Paper No. 2007-37Google Scholar
  18. Farkas G (2003) Cognitive skills and noncognitive traits and behaviors in stratification processes. Annu Rev Sociol 29:541–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flippin CA (2001) Racial and ethnic inequality in home ownership and housing equity. Sociol Q 42(2):121–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freeman RB (1992) Crime and the employment of disadvantaged youth. In: Peterson G, Vroman W (eds) Urban labor markets and job opportunity. Urban Institute, Washington, DC, pp 201–237Google Scholar
  21. Freeman RB (1996) Why do so many young American men commit crimes and what might we do about it? J Econ Perspect 10(1):25–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gelman A, Hill J (2007) Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Goffman E (1963) Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Gottfredson MR, Hirschi T (1990) A general theory of crime. California University Press, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  25. Harris A, Evans H, Beckett K (2010) Drawing blood from stones: legal debt and social inequality in the contemporary United States. Am J Sociol 115(6):1753–1799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harris A, Evans H, Beckett K (2011) Courtesy stigma and monetary sanctions: toward a socio-cultural theory of punishment. Am Sociol Rev 76(2):234–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Henry NW, McGinnis R, Tegtmeyer HW (1971) A finite model of mobility. J Math Sociol 1:107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holzer HJ (1996) What do employers want? Job prospects for less-educated workers. Russell Sage, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Holzer HJ, Raphael S, Stoll MA (2003) Employment barriers facing ex-offenders. Paper presented at Urban Institute Reentry Roundtable, employment dimensions of reentry: understanding the nexus between prisoner reentry and work, May 19–20, 2003, New York University Law SchoolGoogle Scholar
  30. Jacobsen B, Kendrick JM (1973) Education and mobility: from achievement to ascription. Am Sociol Rev 38:439–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Karlson KB, Holm A (2011) Decomposing primary and secondary effects: a new decomposition method. Res Stratif Soc Mobil 29:221–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Karlson KB, Holm A, Breen R (2011) Comparing regression coefficients between same-sample nested models using logit and probit: a new method. Sociol Methodol 42:286–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keister LA (2000a) Wealth in America: trends in wealth inequality. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Keister LA (2000b) Race and wealth inequality: the impact of racial differences in asset ownership on the distribution of household wealth. Soc Sci Res 29:477–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Keister LA, Moller S (2000) Wealth inequality in the United States. Annu Rev Sociol 26:63–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kemper TD (1974) On the nature and purpose of ascription. Am Sociol Rev 39(6):844–853Google Scholar
  37. Kenworthy L (2007) Inequality and sociology. Am Behav Sci 50:584–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kling JR (2006) Incarceration length, employment, and earnings. Am Econ Rev 96(3):863–876Google Scholar
  39. Krivo LJ, Kaufman RL (2004) Housing and wealth inequality: racial–ethnic differences in home equity in the United States. Demography 41(3):585–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Krull JL, MacKinnon DP (2001) Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivar Behav Res 36(2):249–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Link BG, Phelan JC (2001) Conceptualizing stigma. Annu Rev Sociol 27:363–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lopoo LM, Western B (2005) Incarceration and the formation and stability of marital unions. J Marriage Family 67(3):721–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lorber J (1994) The paradoxes of gender. Yale University Press, ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  44. Lott JR Jr (1990) The effect of conviction on the legitimate income of criminals. Econ Lett 34:381–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lyons CJ, Pettit B (2011) Compounded disadvantage: race, incarceration, and wage growth. Soc Probl 58(2):257–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. MacKinnon DP, Dwyer JH (1993) Estimating effects in prevention studies. Eval Rev 17(2):144–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Manza J, Uggen C (2006) Locked out: felon disenfranchisement and American democracy. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Massoglia M (2008a) Incarceration, health, and racial disparities in health. Law Soc Rev 42(2):275–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Massoglia M (2008b) Incarceration as exposure: the prison, infectious disease, and other stress-related illnesses. J Health Soc Behav 49(1):56–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Massoglia M, Firebaugh G, Warner C (2013) Racial variation in the effect of incarceration on neighborhood attainment. Am Sociol Rev 78(1):142–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Matras J (1967) Social mobility and social structure: some insights from the linear model. Am Sociol Rev 32(4):608–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Maume DJ Jr, Cancio AS, Evans TD (1996) Cognitive skills and racial wage inequality: reply to Farkas and Vicknair. Am Sociol Rev 61(4):561–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mayhew L (1968) Ascription in modern societies. Sociol Inq 38(2):105–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McGinnis R (1968) A stochastic model of social mobility. Am Sociol Rev 33:712–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science. Science 159(3810):56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Merton RK (1988) The Matthew effect in science, II: cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. ISIS 79:606–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Modigliani F (1986) Life cycle, individual thrift, and the wealth of nations. Am Econ Rev 76:297–313Google Scholar
  58. Nagin D, Waldfogel J (1998) The effect of conviction on income through the life cycle. Int Rev Law Econ 18:25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. NLSY79 user’s guide: a guide to the 1979–2006 National Survey of Youth Data. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Labor by Center for Human Resource Research. Ohio State University, Center for Human Resource Research, Columbus, OhioGoogle Scholar
  60. Oliver M, Shapiro T (1997) Black wealth/white wealth: a new perspective of racial inequality. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  61. Pager D (2003) The mark of a criminal record. Am J Sociol 108:937–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pager D (2007) Marked: race, crime, and finding work in an era of mass incarceration. University of Chicago Press, IllinoisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pager D, Quillian L (2005) Walking the talk: what employers say versus what they do. Am Sociol Rev 70:355–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pager D, Bonikowski B, Western B (2009) Discrimination in a low-wage labor market: a field experiment. Am Sociol Rev 79:777–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pettit B, Lyons C (2007) Status and the stigma of incarceration: the labor market effects of incarceration by race, class, and criminal involvement. In Bushway S, Stoll MA, Weiman DF (eds.) Barriers to reentry? The labor market for released prisoners in post-industrial America. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 203–226Google Scholar
  66. Pettit B, Western B (2004) Mass imprisonment and the life course: race and class inequality in U.S. incarceration. Am Sociol Rev 69(2):151–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Piore MJ (1970) The dual labor market: theory and implications. In Beer SH, Barringer RE (eds) The state and the poor, Winthrop, pp. 55–59Google Scholar
  68. Reskin BF (2012) The race discrimination system. Annu Rev Sociol 38:17–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sampson RJ, Laub JH (1997) A life-course theory of cumulative disadvantage and the stability of delinquency. In: Thornberry TP (ed) Developmental theories of crime and delinquency: advances in criminological theory. Transaction Publishers, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  70. Samuels P, Mukamel D (2004) After prison—roadblocks to reentry: a report on state legal barriers facing people with criminal records. Legal Action Center, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  71. Schnittker J, John A (2007) Enduring stigma: the long-term effects of incarceration on health. J Health Soc Behav 48(2):115–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schnittker J, Massoglia M, Uggen C (2011) Incarceration and the health of the African American community. Du Bois Review 8(1):133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shapiro TM (2004) The hidden cost of being African American: how wealth perpetuates inequality. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  74. Smith JP (1999) Healthy bodies and thick wallets: the dual relation between health and economic status. J Econ Perspect 13(2):145–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sobel ME (1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural models. Sociol Methodol 13:290–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Spilerman S (2000) Wealth and stratification processes. Annu Rev Sociol 26:497–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Turney K, Schneider D (2014) Incarceration and household wealth. Paper presented at the 2014 PAA Conference, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  78. Turney K, Wildeman C (2013) Redefining relationships: explaining the countervailing consequences of paternal incarceration for parenting. Am Sociol Rev 78:949–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. U.S. Department of Defense (1982) Profile of American Youth: 1980 nationwide administration of the armed services vocational aptitude battery. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  80. Wacquant L (2001) Deadly symbiosis: when ghetto and prison meet the mesh. Punishm Soc 3(1):95–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wakefield S, Uggen C (2010) Incarceration and stratification. Annu Rev Sociol 36:387–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Waldfogel J (1994) The effect of a criminal conviction on income and the trust ‘reposed in the workmen’. J Human Resour 29(1):62–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Western B (2002) The impact of incarceration on wage mobility and inequality. Am Sociol Rev 67(4):526–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Western B (2006) Punishment and inequality in America. Russell Sage, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  85. Western B, Beckett K (1999) How unregulated is the U.S. labor market? The penal system as a labor market institution. Am J Sociol 104:1030–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Western B, Pettit B (2000) Incarceration and racial inequality in men’s employment. Ind Labor Relat Rev 54(1):3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Western B, Kling JR, Weiman DF (2001) The labor market consequences of incarceration. Crime Delinq 47:410–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. White H (1970) Chains of opportunity. Harvard Press, MassachusettsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wildeman C (2009) Parental imprisonment, the prison boom, and the concentration of childhood disadvantage. Demography 46(2):265–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wildeman C (2010) Paternal incarceration and children’s physically aggressive behaviors: evidence from the fragile families and child wellbeing study. Soc Forces 89(1):285–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wildeman C, Muller C (2012) Mass imprisonment and inequality in health and family life. Annu Rev Law Soc Sci 8:11–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Zhang Z, Zyphur MJ, Preacher KJ (2009) Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models problems and solutions. Organ Res Methods 12(4):695–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations