Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 453–483 | Cite as

Immigration and the Changing Nature of Homicide in US Cities, 1980–2010

  • Graham C. OuseyEmail author
  • Charis E. Kubrin
Original Paper



Previous research has neglected to consider whether trends in immigration are related to changes in the nature of homicide. This is important because there is considerable variability in the temporal trends of homicide subtypes disaggregated by circumstance. In the current study, we address this issue by investigating whether within-city changes in immigration are related to temporal variations in rates of overall and circumstance-specific homicide for a sample of large US cities during the period between 1980 and 2010.


Fixed-effects negative binomial and two-stage least squares (2SLS) instrumental variable regression models are used to analyze data from 156 large US cities observed during the 1980–2010 period.


Findings from the analyses suggest that temporal change in overall homicide and drug homicide rates are significantly related to changes in immigration. Specifically, increases in immigration are associated with declining rates for each of the preceding outcome measures. Moreover, for several of the homicide types, findings suggest that the effects of changes in immigration vary across places, with the largest negative associations appearing in cities that had relatively high initial (i.e., 1970) immigration levels.


There is support for the thesis that changes in immigration in recent decades are related to changes in rates of lethal violence. However, it appears that the relationship is contingent and varied, not general.


Homicide Immigration Violent crime trends Fixed-effects models 



The authors thank David Greenberg and Shawn Bushway for input on the modeling strategy.


  1. Alba R, Nee V (2003) Remaking the American mainstream: assimilation and contemporary immigration. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison PD (2005) Fixed effects regression methods for longitudinal data analysis using SAS. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  3. Allison PD (2012) Beware of Software for fixed-effects negative binomial regression. Statistical Horizons Blog. June 8, 2012. Retrieved August 20, 2012.
  4. Allison PD, Waterman R (2002) Fixed effects negative binomial regression models. In: Stolzenberg RM (ed) Socological Methodology 2002. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58:277–297Google Scholar
  6. Block CR (1993) Lethal violence in the Chicago Latino Community. In: Wilson AV (ed) Homicide: the victim/offender connection. Anderson Publishing, Cincinnati, OH, pp 267–342Google Scholar
  7. Block CR, Block RL (1992) Overview of the Chicago homicide project. In: Block CR, Block RL (eds) Questions and answers in lethal and non-lethal violence: proceedings of the first annual workshop of the homicide research working group. National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC, pp 97–122Google Scholar
  8. Blumstein A, Rosenfeld R (1998) Explaining recent trends in U.S. homicide rates. J Crim Law Criminol 88:1175–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blumstein A, Rosenfeld R (2008) Factors contributing to U.S. crime trends. In: Understanding crime trends: workshop report. Proceedings of a two-day workshop held by the National Research Council in April 2007. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, pp 13–44Google Scholar
  10. Blumstein A, Wallman J (2006) The crime drop and beyond. Annu Rev Law Social Sci 2:125–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blumstein A, Rivara FP, Rosenfeld R (2000) The rise and decline of homicide—and why. Annu Rev Public Health 21:505–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cornell DG, Benedek EP, Benedek DM (1989) A typology of juvenile homicide offenders. In: Benedek EP, Cornell DG (eds) Juvenile homicide. American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC, pp 59–84Google Scholar
  13. Curran PJ, Bauer DJ (2011) The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annu Rev Psychol 62:583–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Decker SH (1993) Exploring victim offender relationships in homicide: the role of individual and event characteristics. Justice Q 10:585–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dugan L, Nagin D, Rosenfeld R (1999) Explaining the decline in intimate partner homicide: the effects of changing domesticity, women’s status, and domestic violence resources. Hom Stud 3:187–214Google Scholar
  16. Flewelling R (2004) A nonparametric imputation approach for dealing with missing variables in SHR data. Homicide Stud 8:255–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Flewelling R, Williams K (1999) Categorizing homicides: the use of disaggregated data in homicide research. In: Dwayne Smith M, Zahn MA (eds) Homicide: a sourcebook of social research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  18. Fox JA (2004) Missing data problems in the SHR: imputing offender and relationship characteristics. Homicide Stud 8:214–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldberger AS, Rosenfeld R (eds) (2008) Understanding crime trends: workshop report. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldstein PJ (1985) The drugs/violence nexus: a tripartite conceptual framework. J Drug Iss 39:143–174Google Scholar
  21. Goldstein PJ, Brownstein HH, Ryan PJ (1992) Drug related homicide in New York: 1984 and 1988. Crime Delinq 38:459–476Google Scholar
  22. Greenberg DF (2010) Longitudinal criminology. J Quant Criminol 26:437–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harries K (1993) A victim ecology of drug related homicide. In: Wilson AV (ed) Homicide: the victim/offender connection. Anderson Publishing, Cincinnati, OH, pp 397–414Google Scholar
  24. Kikuchi G, Desmond SA (2010) A longitudinal analysis of neighborhood crime rates using latent growth curve modeling. Sociol Perspect 53:127–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koulish R (2010) Immigration and American democracy: subverting the rule of law. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Kovandzic T, Vieratis LM, Yeisley MR (1998) The structural covariates of urban homicide: reassessing the impact of income inequality and poverty in the post-Reagan era. Criminology 36:569–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kubrin CE (2003) Structural covariates of homicide rates: does type of homicide matter? J Res Crime Delinquency 40:139–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kubrin CE, Herting JR (2003) Neighborhood correlates of homicide trends: an analysis using growth-curve modeling. Sociol Q 44:329–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kubrin CE, Ousey GC (2009) Immigration and homicide in Urban America: what’s the connection? In: McDonald WF (ed) Sociology of crime, law and deviance, Vol 13: immigration, crime and justice. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK, pp 17–32Google Scholar
  30. LaFree G (1999) Declining violent crime rates in the 1990s: predicting crime booms and busts. Annu Rev Sociol 25:145–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Land KC, McCall PL, Cohen LE (1990) Structural covariates of homicide rates: are there any invariances across time and social space? Am J Sociol 95:922–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Levitt SD (2004) Understanding why crime fell in the 1990s: four factors that explain the decline and six that do not. J Econ Perspect 18:163–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Logan JR, Zhang W, Alba RD (2002) Immigrant enclaves and ethnic communities in New York and Los Angeles. Am Sociol Rev 67:299–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. MacDonald JM, Hipp JR, Gill C (2013) The effects of immigrant concentration on changes in neighborhood crime rates. J Quant Criminol 29:191–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martinez R, Lee MT (2000) On immigration and crime. In: Criminal justice 2000: the nature of crime: continuity and change, vol 1. Washington, DC, pp 485–524Google Scholar
  36. Martinez R, Stowell JI, Lee MT (2010) Immigration and crime in an era of transformation: a longitudinal analysis of homicides in San Diego Neighborhoods, 1980–2000. Criminology 48:797–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maxfield M (1989) Circumstances in supplementary homicide reports: variety and validity. Criminology 27:671–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCall PL, Parker KF, MacDonald JM (2008) The dynamic relationship between social, economic, and political factors and homicide rates from 1970 to 2000. Soc Sci Res 37:721–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McCall PL, Land KC, Parker KF (2010) Heterogeneity in the rise and decline of city-level homicide rates, 1976–2005: a latent trajectory analysis. Soc Sci Res 40:363–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mears DP, Bhati AS (2006) No community is an Island: the effects of resource deprivation on urban violence in spatially and socially proximate communities. Criminology 44:509–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Messner SF, Deane GD, Anselin L, Pearson-Nelson B (2005) Locating the vanguard in rising and falling homicide rates across U.S. cities. Criminology 43:661–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Messner SF, South SJ (1992) Interracial homicide: a macrostructural-opportunity perspective. Soc Forum 7:517–536Google Scholar
  43. Miethe TD, Drass KA (1992) Exploring the social context of instrumental and expressive homicides: an application of qualitative comparative analysis. J Quant Crim 15:1–21Google Scholar
  44. Miethe TD, Regoeczi WC (2004) Rethinking homicide: exploring the structure and process underlying deadly situations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Minnesota Population Center (2011) National Historical Geographic Information System: Version 2.0. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
  46. Morenoff JD, Sampson RJ (1997) Violent crime and the spatial dynamics of neighborhood transition: Chicago, 1970–1990. Soc Forces 76:31–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nelsen C, Corzine J, Huff-Corzine L (1994) The violent West re-examined: a research note on regional homicide rates. Criminol 32:149–161Google Scholar
  48. Nielsen AL, Lee MT, Martinez R (2005) Integrating race, place and motive in social disorganization theory: lessons from a comparison of black and Latino homicide types in two immigrant destination cities. Criminology 43:837–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Oropesa RS, Gorman BK (2000) Ethnicity, immigration, and beliefs about marriage as ties that bind. In: Waite LJ (ed) The ties that bind: perspectives on marriage and cohabitation. Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, NY, pp 188–211Google Scholar
  50. Oropesa RS, Landale NS (2004) The future of marriage and Hispanics. J Marriage Fam 66:901–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Osgood DW (2000) Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. J Quant Criminol 16:21–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ousey GC (1999) Homicide, structural factors and the racial invariance assumption. Criminology 37:405–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ousey GC, Kubrin CE (2009) Exploring the connection between immigration and violent crime rates in U.S. Cities, 1980–2000. Soc Probl 56:447–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ousey GC, Lee MR (2002) Examining the conditional nature of the illicit drug markets-homicide relationship: a partial test of the theory of contingent causation. Criminology 40:101–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pampel FC, Williams KR (2000) Intimacy and homicide: compensating for missing data in the SHR. Criminology 38:661–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Papachristos A (2009) Murder by structure: dominance relations and the social structure of Gang Homicide. Am J Sociol 115:74–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Parker RN (1989) Poverty, subculture of violence, and type of homicide. Soc Forces 67:983–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Parker KF (2001) A move toward specificity: examining urban disadvantage and race- and relationship-specific homicide rates. J Quant Criminol 17:89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Parker KF (2004) Industrial shift, polarized labor markets and urban violence: modeling the dynamics between the economic transformation and disaggregated homicide. Criminology 42:619–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Parker RN, Dwayne Smith M (1979) Deterrence, poverty and type of homicide. Am J Sociol 85:614–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Parker RN, Toth AM (1990) Family, intimacy and homicide: a macro-social approach. Violence Vict 5:195–210Google Scholar
  62. Phillips JA (2006a) Explaining discrepant findings in cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses: an application to U.S. homicide rates. Soc Sci Res 35(4):948–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Phillips JA (2006b) The relationship between age structure and homicide rates in the United States, 1970 to 1999. J Res Crime Delinquency 43:230–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Portes A, Rumbaut R (2006) Immigrant America: a portrait. University of California Press, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  65. Provine DM, Varsanyi M, Lewis PG, Decker SH (2012) Growing tensions between civic membership and enforcement in the devolution of immigration control. In Kubrin CE, Zatz MS, Martinez R Jr (eds) Punishing immigrants: policy, politics and injustice. New York University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. Pyrooz D (2012) Structural covariates of gang homicide in large U.S. cities. J Res Crime Delinq 49:489–518Google Scholar
  67. Riedel M, Przybylski RK (1993) Stranger murders and assault: a study of a neglected form of stranger violence. In: Wilson AV (ed) Homicide: the victim/offender connection. Anderson, Cincinnati, OH, pp 359–382Google Scholar
  68. Rodriguez SF, Henderson VA (1995) Intimate homicide: victim-offender relationship in male homicides by females. Deviant Behav 16:45–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rojek D, Williams J (1993) Interracial vs. intraracial offenses in terms of the victim/offender relationship. In: Wilson AV (ed) Homicide: the victim/offender connection. Anderson, Cincinnati, OH, pp 249–266Google Scholar
  70. Rosenfeld R (2002) Crime decline in context. Contexts 1:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rosenfeld R, Goldberger AS (2008) Introduction. In: Understanding crime trends: workshop report. Proceedings of a two-day workshop held by the National Research Council in April 2007. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  72. Rosenfeld R, Bray TM, Egley A (1999) Facilitating violence: a comparison of gang-motivated, gang-affiliated, and nongang youth homicides. J Quant Criminol 15:495–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sampson RJ (2006) Open doors don’t invite criminals: is increased immigration behind the drop in crime? New York Times March 11:A27Google Scholar
  74. Sampson RJ, Morenoff JD (2004) Spatial (dis)advantage and homicide in chicago neighborhoods. In: Goodchild M, Janelle D (eds) Spatially integrated social science. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 145–170Google Scholar
  75. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F (1997) Neighborhoods and violent crime: testing social disorganization theory. Science 277:918–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Shihadeh ES, Barranco RE (2010) Latino immigration, economic deprivation, and violence: regional differences in the effect of linguistic isolation. Homicide Stud 14:336–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Shihadeh ES, Ousey GC (1998) Industrial restructuring and violence: the link between entry-level jobs, economic deprivation and black and white homicide in central cities. Soc Forces 77:185–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Singer A (2004) “The Rise of New Immigrant Gateways.” The living cities census series. Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  79. Stock JH, Yogo M (2005) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. Ch. 5 In Stock JH, Andrews DWK (eds) Identification and inference for econometric models: essays in Honor of Thomas J. Rothenberg. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  80. Stowell JI, Messner SF, McGeever KF, Raffalovich LE (2009) Immigration and the recent violent crime drop in the United States: a pooled, cross-sectional time-series analysis of metropolitan areas. Criminology 47:889–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Velez M (2009) Contextualizing the immigration and crime effect. Homicide Stud 13:325–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wadsworth T (2010) Is Immigration responsible for the crime drop? An assessment of the influence of immigration on changes in violent crime between 1990 and 2000. Soc Sci Q 91:531–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wadsworth T, Kubrin CE (2004) Structural factors and black interracial homicide: a new examination of the causal process. Criminol 42:647–672Google Scholar
  84. Wadsworth T, Roberts JM (2008) When missing data are not missing: a new approach to evaluating supplemental homicide report imputation strategies. Criminology 46:841–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Weisburd D, Bushway S, Lum C, Yang S-M (2004) Trajectories of crime at places: a longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology 42:283–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Williams KR, Flewelling RL (1987) Family, acquaintance, and stranger homicide: alternative procedures for rate calculation. Criminology 25:543–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Williams KR, Flewelling RL (1988) The social production of criminal homicide: a comparative study of disaggregated rates in U.S. cities. Am Soc Rev 53:421–431Google Scholar
  88. Wolfgang ME (1958) Patterns in criminal homicide. University of Pennsylvania Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  89. Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  90. Zahn MA (1991) The wolfgang model: lessons for homicide research in the 1990s. J Crime Justice 14:17–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zimring FE (2007) The great American crime decline. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyCollege of William and MaryWilliamsburgUSA
  2. 2.Department of Criminology, Law and SocietyUniversity of California, IrvineIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations