Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 629–649 | Cite as

Post-release Employment and Recidivism in Norway

Original Paper

Abstract

Objectives

Investigate the transition from prison to employment and the relationship between post-release employment and recidivism.

Methods

We use a sample of every person released from Norwegian prisons in 2003 (N = 7,476), and they are followed through 2006 with monthly measures. We estimate the time to recidivism using discrete time survival models, conditioning upon both pre-release characteristics and post-release time-varying covariates (employment, educational enrollment and participation in labor market programs).

Results

The majority of former inmates were employed at some point in our data window, but it took approximately 30 months for 30% of them to become employed. The hazard of recidivism is substantially lower (0.12, p < .001) when former inmates are employed compared with unemployed, although observable individual characteristics can account for a large share of this association (0.50, p < .001, after adjustment). The negative association between employment and recidivism remains when controlling for other post-release statuses. Although post-release employment periods are associated with a lower risk of recidivism for all categories of principal offence, the magnitude of the association varies. The association is smaller for those receiving social benefits.

Conclusion

The findings are consistent with theories suggesting that employment reduces the risk of recidivism.

Keywords

Release from prison Recidivism Post-release employment Survival analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to seminar participants for helpful comments and discussions and to Erling Holmøy, Willy Pedersen, Steven Messner and two anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier versions of this paper. We gratefully appreciate financial support from the Norwegian Ministry of Justice and the Police, the Norwegian Research Council, and Statistics Norway for this project.

References

  1. Allison PD (1995) Survival analysis using the SAS system: a practical guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumer E (1997) Levels and predictors of recidivism: the Malta experience. Criminology 35:601–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker G (1993) Nobel lecture: the economic way of looking at behavior. J Polit Econ 101:385–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg MT, Huebner BM (2010) Reentry and the ties that bind: an examination of social ties, employment and recidivism. Justice Q 28:382–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berk RA, Lenihan KJ, Rossi PH (1980) Crime and poverty: some experimental evidence from ex-offenders. Am Sociol Rev 45:766–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bloom D (2006) Employment-focused programs for ex-prisoners. What have we learned, what are we learning, and where should we go from here? MDRC, New York, http://www.mdrc.org/publications/435/full.pdf
  7. Bushway S, Reuter P (1997) Labor markets and crime risk factors: Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of MarylandGoogle Scholar
  8. Cleveland WS, Gross E, Shyu WM (1993) Local regression models. In: Chambers JM, Hastie TJ (eds) Statistical models in S. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 309–376Google Scholar
  9. Ehrlich I (1973) Participation in illegitimate activities: a theoretical and empirical investigation. J Polit Econ 81:531–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Entorf H (2009) Crime and the labour market: evidence from a survey of inmates, ZEW Discussion Paper No. 08-131Google Scholar
  11. Farrall S, Calverley A (2006) Understanding desistance from crime. Open University Press, MaidenheadGoogle Scholar
  12. Felson M (1998) Crime and everyday life, 2nd edn. Pine Forge, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  13. Giordano PC, Cernkovich SA, Rudolph JL (2002) Gender, crime, and desistance: towards a theory of cognitive transformation. Am J Sociol 107:990–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grogger J (1995) The effect of arrests on the employment and earnings of young men. Q J Econ 110:51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harrison B, Scheher RC (2004) Offenders and post-release jobs: variables influencing success and failure. J Offender Rehabil 39:35–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hirschi T (1969) Causes of delinquency. University of California Press, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  17. Horney J, Osgood DW, Marshall IH (1995) Criminal careers in the short-term: intra-individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances. Am Sociol Rev 60:655–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hosmer DH, Lemeshow S (1999) Applied survival analysis. Regression modeling of time to event data. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Langan PA, Levin DJ (2002) Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. US Department of Justice, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  20. Laub JH, Sampson RJ (2003) Shared beginnings, divergent lives: delinquent boys to age 70. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  21. Lyngstad TH, Skardhamar T (2011) Nordic register data and their untapped potential for criminological knowledge. In: Tonry M, Lappi-Seppälä T (eds) Crime & justice: a review of research. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 613–645Google Scholar
  22. Maruna S (2001) Making good: how ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. American Psychological Association, WashingtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mears DP, Wang X, Hay C, Bales WD (2008) Social ecology and recidivism: implications for prisoner reentry. Criminology 46:301–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Merton RK (1968) Social structure and anomie. In: Merton RK (ed) Social theory and social structure (1968 enlarged edition ed). The Free Press, New York, pp 185–214Google Scholar
  25. O’Donnell I, Baumer EP, Hughes N (2008) Recidivism in the Republic of Ireland. Criminol Crim Justice 8:123–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pager D (2003) The mark of a criminal record. Am J Sociol 108:937–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Piquero AR, Brame R, Mazerolle P, Haapanen R (2002) Crime in emerging adulthood. Criminology 40:137–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pratt J (2008) Scandinavian exceptionalism in an era of excess. Part I: the nature and roots of Scandinavian exceptionalism. Br J Criminol 48:119–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Raphael S (2011) Incarceration and prisoner reentry in the United States. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 635:192–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Røed K, Raaum O (2003) Administrative registers—unexplored reservoirs of scientific knowledge? Econ J 113:258–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sedgley NH, Scott CE, Williams NA, Derrick FW (2008) Prison’s dilemma: do Education and jobs programmes affect recidivism? Economica 77:1–21Google Scholar
  32. Skardhamar T (2003) Inmates’ social background and living conditions. J Scand Stud Criminol Crime Prev 4:39–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Statistics Norway (2010) Immigration and immigrants 2010. Oslo, Statistics NorwayGoogle Scholar
  34. Uggen C (2000) Work as a turning point in the life course of criminals: a duration model of age, employment, and recidivism. Am Sociol Rev 67:529–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Uggen C, Manza J, Angela B (2004) Less than the average citizen: stigma, role transition, and the civic reintegration of convicted felons. In: Maruna S, Immarigeon R (eds) After crime and punishment: pathways to offender reintegration. Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp 261–293Google Scholar
  36. Visher CA, Travis J (2003) Transitions from prison to community: understanding individual pathways. Annu Rev Sociol 29:89–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Visher CA, Winterfield L, Coggeshapp MB (2005) Ex-offender employment programs and recidivism: a meta-analysis. J Exp Criminol 1:295–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Visher C, Debus S, Yahner J (2008) Employment after prison: a longitudinal study of releasees in three states, Research Brief, October 2008: Urban Institute, Justice Policy CenterGoogle Scholar
  39. Warr M (1998) Life-course transitions and desistance from crime. Criminology 36:183–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wartna BSJ, Nijssen LTJ (2006) National studies on recidivism: an inventory of large-scale recidivism research in 33 European Countries. WODC, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilson DB, Gallagher CA, MacKenzie DL (2000) A meta-analysis of corrections-based education, vocation, and work programs for adult offenders. J Res Crime Delinq 37:347–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Statistics Norway, Research DepartmentOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations